cpython/.gitignore

127 lines
1.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Normal View History

bpo-37936: Systematically distinguish rooted vs. unrooted in .gitignore (GH-15823) A root cause of bpo-37936 is that it's easy to write a .gitignore rule that's intended to apply to a specific file (e.g., the `pyconfig.h` generated by `./configure`) but actually applies to all similarly-named files in the tree (e.g., `PC/pyconfig.h`.) Specifically, any rule with no non-trailing slashes is applied in an "unrooted" way, to files anywhere in the tree. This means that if we write the rules in the most obvious-looking way, then * for specific files we want to ignore that happen to be in subdirectories (like `Modules/config.c`), the rule will work as intended, staying "rooted" to the top of the tree; but * when a specific file we want to ignore happens to be at the root of the repo (like `platform`), then the obvious rule (`platform`) will apply much more broadly than intended: if someone tries to add a file or directory named `platform` somewhere else in the tree, it will unexpectedly get ignored. That's surprising behavior that can make the .gitignore file's behavior feel finicky and unpredictable. To avoid it, we can simply always give a rule "rooted" behavior when that's what's intended, by systematically using leading slashes. Further, to help make the pattern obvious when looking at the file and minimize any need for thinking about the syntax when adding new rules: separate the rules into one group for each type, with brief comments identifying them. For most of these rules it's clear whether they're meant to be rooted or unrooted, but in a handful of cases I've only guessed. In that case the safer default (the choice that won't hide information) is the narrower, rooted meaning, with a leading slash. If for some of these the unrooted meaning is desired after all, it'll be easy to move them to the unrooted section at the top.
2019-09-11 06:25:26 -03:00
#####
# First, rules intended to apply in all subdirectories.
# These contain no slash, or only a trailing slash.
2010-12-17 18:24:30 -04:00
*.cover
*.iml
2010-12-17 18:24:30 -04:00
*.o
bpo-37936: Systematically distinguish rooted vs. unrooted in .gitignore (GH-15823) A root cause of bpo-37936 is that it's easy to write a .gitignore rule that's intended to apply to a specific file (e.g., the `pyconfig.h` generated by `./configure`) but actually applies to all similarly-named files in the tree (e.g., `PC/pyconfig.h`.) Specifically, any rule with no non-trailing slashes is applied in an "unrooted" way, to files anywhere in the tree. This means that if we write the rules in the most obvious-looking way, then * for specific files we want to ignore that happen to be in subdirectories (like `Modules/config.c`), the rule will work as intended, staying "rooted" to the top of the tree; but * when a specific file we want to ignore happens to be at the root of the repo (like `platform`), then the obvious rule (`platform`) will apply much more broadly than intended: if someone tries to add a file or directory named `platform` somewhere else in the tree, it will unexpectedly get ignored. That's surprising behavior that can make the .gitignore file's behavior feel finicky and unpredictable. To avoid it, we can simply always give a rule "rooted" behavior when that's what's intended, by systematically using leading slashes. Further, to help make the pattern obvious when looking at the file and minimize any need for thinking about the syntax when adding new rules: separate the rules into one group for each type, with brief comments identifying them. For most of these rules it's clear whether they're meant to be rooted or unrooted, but in a handful of cases I've only guessed. In that case the safer default (the choice that won't hide information) is the narrower, rooted meaning, with a leading slash. If for some of these the unrooted meaning is desired after all, it'll be easy to move them to the unrooted section at the top.
2019-09-11 06:25:26 -03:00
*.a
*.so
*.so.*
bpo-37936: Systematically distinguish rooted vs. unrooted in .gitignore (GH-15823) A root cause of bpo-37936 is that it's easy to write a .gitignore rule that's intended to apply to a specific file (e.g., the `pyconfig.h` generated by `./configure`) but actually applies to all similarly-named files in the tree (e.g., `PC/pyconfig.h`.) Specifically, any rule with no non-trailing slashes is applied in an "unrooted" way, to files anywhere in the tree. This means that if we write the rules in the most obvious-looking way, then * for specific files we want to ignore that happen to be in subdirectories (like `Modules/config.c`), the rule will work as intended, staying "rooted" to the top of the tree; but * when a specific file we want to ignore happens to be at the root of the repo (like `platform`), then the obvious rule (`platform`) will apply much more broadly than intended: if someone tries to add a file or directory named `platform` somewhere else in the tree, it will unexpectedly get ignored. That's surprising behavior that can make the .gitignore file's behavior feel finicky and unpredictable. To avoid it, we can simply always give a rule "rooted" behavior when that's what's intended, by systematically using leading slashes. Further, to help make the pattern obvious when looking at the file and minimize any need for thinking about the syntax when adding new rules: separate the rules into one group for each type, with brief comments identifying them. For most of these rules it's clear whether they're meant to be rooted or unrooted, but in a handful of cases I've only guessed. In that case the safer default (the choice that won't hide information) is the narrower, rooted meaning, with a leading slash. If for some of these the unrooted meaning is desired after all, it'll be easy to move them to the unrooted section at the top.
2019-09-11 06:25:26 -03:00
*.dylib
*.dll
2010-12-17 18:24:30 -04:00
*.orig
*.pyc
*.pyd
*.pyo
*.rej
*.swp
2010-12-17 18:24:30 -04:00
*~
*.gc??
*.profclang?
*.profraw
*.dyn
.gdb_history
bpo-37936: Systematically distinguish rooted vs. unrooted in .gitignore (GH-15823) A root cause of bpo-37936 is that it's easy to write a .gitignore rule that's intended to apply to a specific file (e.g., the `pyconfig.h` generated by `./configure`) but actually applies to all similarly-named files in the tree (e.g., `PC/pyconfig.h`.) Specifically, any rule with no non-trailing slashes is applied in an "unrooted" way, to files anywhere in the tree. This means that if we write the rules in the most obvious-looking way, then * for specific files we want to ignore that happen to be in subdirectories (like `Modules/config.c`), the rule will work as intended, staying "rooted" to the top of the tree; but * when a specific file we want to ignore happens to be at the root of the repo (like `platform`), then the obvious rule (`platform`) will apply much more broadly than intended: if someone tries to add a file or directory named `platform` somewhere else in the tree, it will unexpectedly get ignored. That's surprising behavior that can make the .gitignore file's behavior feel finicky and unpredictable. To avoid it, we can simply always give a rule "rooted" behavior when that's what's intended, by systematically using leading slashes. Further, to help make the pattern obvious when looking at the file and minimize any need for thinking about the syntax when adding new rules: separate the rules into one group for each type, with brief comments identifying them. For most of these rules it's clear whether they're meant to be rooted or unrooted, but in a handful of cases I've only guessed. In that case the safer default (the choice that won't hide information) is the narrower, rooted meaning, with a leading slash. If for some of these the unrooted meaning is desired after all, it'll be easy to move them to the unrooted section at the top.
2019-09-11 06:25:26 -03:00
.purify
__pycache__
.hg/
.svn/
.idea/
tags
TAGS
.vs/
.vscode/
gmon.out
.coverage
.mypy_cache/
.pytest_cache/
bpo-37936: Systematically distinguish rooted vs. unrooted in .gitignore (GH-15823) A root cause of bpo-37936 is that it's easy to write a .gitignore rule that's intended to apply to a specific file (e.g., the `pyconfig.h` generated by `./configure`) but actually applies to all similarly-named files in the tree (e.g., `PC/pyconfig.h`.) Specifically, any rule with no non-trailing slashes is applied in an "unrooted" way, to files anywhere in the tree. This means that if we write the rules in the most obvious-looking way, then * for specific files we want to ignore that happen to be in subdirectories (like `Modules/config.c`), the rule will work as intended, staying "rooted" to the top of the tree; but * when a specific file we want to ignore happens to be at the root of the repo (like `platform`), then the obvious rule (`platform`) will apply much more broadly than intended: if someone tries to add a file or directory named `platform` somewhere else in the tree, it will unexpectedly get ignored. That's surprising behavior that can make the .gitignore file's behavior feel finicky and unpredictable. To avoid it, we can simply always give a rule "rooted" behavior when that's what's intended, by systematically using leading slashes. Further, to help make the pattern obvious when looking at the file and minimize any need for thinking about the syntax when adding new rules: separate the rules into one group for each type, with brief comments identifying them. For most of these rules it's clear whether they're meant to be rooted or unrooted, but in a handful of cases I've only guessed. In that case the safer default (the choice that won't hide information) is the narrower, rooted meaning, with a leading slash. If for some of these the unrooted meaning is desired after all, it'll be easy to move them to the unrooted section at the top.
2019-09-11 06:25:26 -03:00
*.exe
!Lib/distutils/command/*.exe
# Ignore core dumps... but not Tools/msi/core/ or the like.
core
!core/
#####
# Then, rules meant for a specific location relative to the repo root.
# These must contain a non-trailing slash (and may also have a trailing slash.)
2010-10-25 14:37:18 -03:00
Doc/build/
Doc/venv/
Doc/.venv/
Doc/env/
Doc/.env/
Include/pydtrace_probes.h
Lib/distutils/command/*.pdb
2010-12-17 18:24:30 -04:00
Lib/lib2to3/*.pickle
Lib/test/data/*
!Lib/test/data/README
/Makefile
bpo-37936: Systematically distinguish rooted vs. unrooted in .gitignore (GH-15823) A root cause of bpo-37936 is that it's easy to write a .gitignore rule that's intended to apply to a specific file (e.g., the `pyconfig.h` generated by `./configure`) but actually applies to all similarly-named files in the tree (e.g., `PC/pyconfig.h`.) Specifically, any rule with no non-trailing slashes is applied in an "unrooted" way, to files anywhere in the tree. This means that if we write the rules in the most obvious-looking way, then * for specific files we want to ignore that happen to be in subdirectories (like `Modules/config.c`), the rule will work as intended, staying "rooted" to the top of the tree; but * when a specific file we want to ignore happens to be at the root of the repo (like `platform`), then the obvious rule (`platform`) will apply much more broadly than intended: if someone tries to add a file or directory named `platform` somewhere else in the tree, it will unexpectedly get ignored. That's surprising behavior that can make the .gitignore file's behavior feel finicky and unpredictable. To avoid it, we can simply always give a rule "rooted" behavior when that's what's intended, by systematically using leading slashes. Further, to help make the pattern obvious when looking at the file and minimize any need for thinking about the syntax when adding new rules: separate the rules into one group for each type, with brief comments identifying them. For most of these rules it's clear whether they're meant to be rooted or unrooted, but in a handful of cases I've only guessed. In that case the safer default (the choice that won't hide information) is the narrower, rooted meaning, with a leading slash. If for some of these the unrooted meaning is desired after all, it'll be easy to move them to the unrooted section at the top.
2019-09-11 06:25:26 -03:00
/Makefile.pre
2010-10-25 14:37:18 -03:00
Misc/python.pc
Misc/python-embed.pc
Misc/python-config.sh
2010-10-25 14:37:18 -03:00
Modules/Setup.config
Modules/Setup.local
Modules/config.c
2010-12-17 18:24:30 -04:00
Modules/ld_so_aix
Programs/_freeze_importlib
Programs/_testembed
PC/python_nt*.h
PC/pythonnt_rc*.h
Modules/python.exp
PC/*/*.exp
PC/*/*.lib
PC/*/*.bsc
PC/*/*.dll
PC/*/*.pdb
PC/*/*.user
PC/*/*.ncb
PC/*/*.suo
PC/*/Win32-temp-*
PC/*/x64-temp-*
PC/*/amd64
PCbuild/*.user
PCbuild/*.suo
PCbuild/*.*sdf
PCbuild/*-pgi
PCbuild/*-pgo
PCbuild/*.VC.db
PCbuild/*.VC.opendb
PCbuild/amd64/
PCbuild/arm32/
PCbuild/arm64/
PCbuild/obj/
2017-07-06 17:43:37 -03:00
PCbuild/win32/
Tools/unicode/data/
bpo-37936: Systematically distinguish rooted vs. unrooted in .gitignore (GH-15823) A root cause of bpo-37936 is that it's easy to write a .gitignore rule that's intended to apply to a specific file (e.g., the `pyconfig.h` generated by `./configure`) but actually applies to all similarly-named files in the tree (e.g., `PC/pyconfig.h`.) Specifically, any rule with no non-trailing slashes is applied in an "unrooted" way, to files anywhere in the tree. This means that if we write the rules in the most obvious-looking way, then * for specific files we want to ignore that happen to be in subdirectories (like `Modules/config.c`), the rule will work as intended, staying "rooted" to the top of the tree; but * when a specific file we want to ignore happens to be at the root of the repo (like `platform`), then the obvious rule (`platform`) will apply much more broadly than intended: if someone tries to add a file or directory named `platform` somewhere else in the tree, it will unexpectedly get ignored. That's surprising behavior that can make the .gitignore file's behavior feel finicky and unpredictable. To avoid it, we can simply always give a rule "rooted" behavior when that's what's intended, by systematically using leading slashes. Further, to help make the pattern obvious when looking at the file and minimize any need for thinking about the syntax when adding new rules: separate the rules into one group for each type, with brief comments identifying them. For most of these rules it's clear whether they're meant to be rooted or unrooted, but in a handful of cases I've only guessed. In that case the safer default (the choice that won't hide information) is the narrower, rooted meaning, with a leading slash. If for some of these the unrooted meaning is desired after all, it'll be easy to move them to the unrooted section at the top.
2019-09-11 06:25:26 -03:00
/autom4te.cache
/build/
/config.cache
/config.log
/config.status
/config.status.lineno
/platform
/profile-clean-stamp
/profile-run-stamp
bpo-37936: Systematically distinguish rooted vs. unrooted in .gitignore (GH-15823) A root cause of bpo-37936 is that it's easy to write a .gitignore rule that's intended to apply to a specific file (e.g., the `pyconfig.h` generated by `./configure`) but actually applies to all similarly-named files in the tree (e.g., `PC/pyconfig.h`.) Specifically, any rule with no non-trailing slashes is applied in an "unrooted" way, to files anywhere in the tree. This means that if we write the rules in the most obvious-looking way, then * for specific files we want to ignore that happen to be in subdirectories (like `Modules/config.c`), the rule will work as intended, staying "rooted" to the top of the tree; but * when a specific file we want to ignore happens to be at the root of the repo (like `platform`), then the obvious rule (`platform`) will apply much more broadly than intended: if someone tries to add a file or directory named `platform` somewhere else in the tree, it will unexpectedly get ignored. That's surprising behavior that can make the .gitignore file's behavior feel finicky and unpredictable. To avoid it, we can simply always give a rule "rooted" behavior when that's what's intended, by systematically using leading slashes. Further, to help make the pattern obvious when looking at the file and minimize any need for thinking about the syntax when adding new rules: separate the rules into one group for each type, with brief comments identifying them. For most of these rules it's clear whether they're meant to be rooted or unrooted, but in a handful of cases I've only guessed. In that case the safer default (the choice that won't hide information) is the narrower, rooted meaning, with a leading slash. If for some of these the unrooted meaning is desired after all, it'll be easy to move them to the unrooted section at the top.
2019-09-11 06:25:26 -03:00
/pybuilddir.txt
/pyconfig.h
bpo-37936: Systematically distinguish rooted vs. unrooted in .gitignore (GH-15823) A root cause of bpo-37936 is that it's easy to write a .gitignore rule that's intended to apply to a specific file (e.g., the `pyconfig.h` generated by `./configure`) but actually applies to all similarly-named files in the tree (e.g., `PC/pyconfig.h`.) Specifically, any rule with no non-trailing slashes is applied in an "unrooted" way, to files anywhere in the tree. This means that if we write the rules in the most obvious-looking way, then * for specific files we want to ignore that happen to be in subdirectories (like `Modules/config.c`), the rule will work as intended, staying "rooted" to the top of the tree; but * when a specific file we want to ignore happens to be at the root of the repo (like `platform`), then the obvious rule (`platform`) will apply much more broadly than intended: if someone tries to add a file or directory named `platform` somewhere else in the tree, it will unexpectedly get ignored. That's surprising behavior that can make the .gitignore file's behavior feel finicky and unpredictable. To avoid it, we can simply always give a rule "rooted" behavior when that's what's intended, by systematically using leading slashes. Further, to help make the pattern obvious when looking at the file and minimize any need for thinking about the syntax when adding new rules: separate the rules into one group for each type, with brief comments identifying them. For most of these rules it's clear whether they're meant to be rooted or unrooted, but in a handful of cases I've only guessed. In that case the safer default (the choice that won't hide information) is the narrower, rooted meaning, with a leading slash. If for some of these the unrooted meaning is desired after all, it'll be easy to move them to the unrooted section at the top.
2019-09-11 06:25:26 -03:00
/python-config
/python-config.py
/python.bat
/python-gdb.py
/python.exe-gdb.py
/reflog.txt
/coverage/
/externals/
/htmlcov/
2015-02-06 02:08:48 -04:00
Tools/msi/obj
Tools/ssl/amd64
Tools/ssl/win32
bpo-37936: Systematically distinguish rooted vs. unrooted in .gitignore (GH-15823) A root cause of bpo-37936 is that it's easy to write a .gitignore rule that's intended to apply to a specific file (e.g., the `pyconfig.h` generated by `./configure`) but actually applies to all similarly-named files in the tree (e.g., `PC/pyconfig.h`.) Specifically, any rule with no non-trailing slashes is applied in an "unrooted" way, to files anywhere in the tree. This means that if we write the rules in the most obvious-looking way, then * for specific files we want to ignore that happen to be in subdirectories (like `Modules/config.c`), the rule will work as intended, staying "rooted" to the top of the tree; but * when a specific file we want to ignore happens to be at the root of the repo (like `platform`), then the obvious rule (`platform`) will apply much more broadly than intended: if someone tries to add a file or directory named `platform` somewhere else in the tree, it will unexpectedly get ignored. That's surprising behavior that can make the .gitignore file's behavior feel finicky and unpredictable. To avoid it, we can simply always give a rule "rooted" behavior when that's what's intended, by systematically using leading slashes. Further, to help make the pattern obvious when looking at the file and minimize any need for thinking about the syntax when adding new rules: separate the rules into one group for each type, with brief comments identifying them. For most of these rules it's clear whether they're meant to be rooted or unrooted, but in a handful of cases I've only guessed. In that case the safer default (the choice that won't hide information) is the narrower, rooted meaning, with a leading slash. If for some of these the unrooted meaning is desired after all, it'll be easy to move them to the unrooted section at the top.
2019-09-11 06:25:26 -03:00
# Two-trick pony for OSX and other case insensitive file systems:
# Ignore ./python binary on Unix but still look into ./Python/ directory.
/python
!/Python/