dchvs
/
Jetpack
forked from rrcarlosr/Jetpack
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
Jetpack/kernel/kernel-4.9/rt-patches/0012-futex-Pull-rt_mutex_fu...

365 lines
12 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

From 3cb719ae2f7ac7f1191166fc415d907dbbeca306 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:35:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 012/352] futex: Pull rt_mutex_futex_unlock() out from under
hb->lock
Upstream commit 16ffa12d742534d4ff73e8b3a4e81c1de39196f0
There's a number of 'interesting' problems, all caused by holding
hb->lock while doing the rt_mutex_unlock() equivalient.
Notably:
- a PI inversion on hb->lock; and,
- a SCHED_DEADLINE crash because of pointer instability.
The previous changes:
- changed the locking rules to cover {uval,pi_state} with wait_lock.
- allow to do rt_mutex_futex_unlock() without dropping wait_lock; which in
turn allows to rely on wait_lock atomicity completely.
- simplified the waiter conundrum.
It's now sufficient to hold rtmutex::wait_lock and a reference on the
pi_state to protect the state consistency, so hb->lock can be dropped
before calling rt_mutex_futex_unlock().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc: xlpang@redhat.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Cc: jdesfossez@efficios.com
Cc: dvhart@infradead.org
Cc: bristot@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170322104151.900002056@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/futex.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 6c0eb8a..802a2a0 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -920,10 +920,12 @@ void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr)
pi_state->owner = NULL;
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
- rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
-
+ get_pi_state(pi_state);
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
+ rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
+ put_pi_state(pi_state);
+
raw_spin_lock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
}
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
@@ -1036,6 +1038,11 @@ static int attach_to_pi_state(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval,
* has dropped the hb->lock in between queue_me() and unqueue_me_pi(),
* which in turn means that futex_lock_pi() still has a reference on
* our pi_state.
+ *
+ * The waiter holding a reference on @pi_state also protects against
+ * the unlocked put_pi_state() in futex_unlock_pi(), futex_lock_pi()
+ * and futex_wait_requeue_pi() as it cannot go to 0 and consequently
+ * free pi_state before we can take a reference ourselves.
*/
WARN_ON(!atomic_read(&pi_state->refcount));
@@ -1379,48 +1386,40 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
smp_store_release(&q->lock_ptr, NULL);
}
-static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_q *top_waiter,
- struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
+/*
+ * Caller must hold a reference on @pi_state.
+ */
+static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_pi_state *pi_state)
{
- struct task_struct *new_owner;
- struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = top_waiter->pi_state;
u32 uninitialized_var(curval), newval;
+ struct task_struct *new_owner;
+ bool deboost = false;
WAKE_Q(wake_q);
- bool deboost;
int ret = 0;
- if (!pi_state)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- /*
- * If current does not own the pi_state then the futex is
- * inconsistent and user space fiddled with the futex value.
- */
- if (pi_state->owner != current)
- return -EINVAL;
-
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
new_owner = rt_mutex_next_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
-
- /*
- * When we interleave with futex_lock_pi() where it does
- * rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(), we might observe @this futex_q waiter,
- * but the rt_mutex's wait_list can be empty (either still, or again,
- * depending on which side we land).
- *
- * When this happens, give up our locks and try again, giving the
- * futex_lock_pi() instance time to complete, either by waiting on the
- * rtmutex or removing itself from the futex queue.
- */
if (!new_owner) {
- raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
- return -EAGAIN;
+ /*
+ * Since we held neither hb->lock nor wait_lock when coming
+ * into this function, we could have raced with futex_lock_pi()
+ * such that we might observe @this futex_q waiter, but the
+ * rt_mutex's wait_list can be empty (either still, or again,
+ * depending on which side we land).
+ *
+ * When this happens, give up our locks and try again, giving
+ * the futex_lock_pi() instance time to complete, either by
+ * waiting on the rtmutex or removing itself from the futex
+ * queue.
+ */
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
/*
- * We pass it to the next owner. The WAITERS bit is always
- * kept enabled while there is PI state around. We cleanup the
- * owner died bit, because we are the owner.
+ * We pass it to the next owner. The WAITERS bit is always kept
+ * enabled while there is PI state around. We cleanup the owner
+ * died bit, because we are the owner.
*/
newval = FUTEX_WAITERS | task_pid_vnr(new_owner);
@@ -1443,10 +1442,8 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_q *top_waiter
ret = -EINVAL;
}
- if (ret) {
- raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unlock;
raw_spin_lock(&pi_state->owner->pi_lock);
WARN_ON(list_empty(&pi_state->list));
@@ -1464,15 +1461,15 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_q *top_waiter
*/
deboost = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wake_q);
+out_unlock:
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
- spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
if (deboost) {
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
}
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
/*
@@ -2281,7 +2278,8 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q,
/*
* We are here either because we stole the rtmutex from the
* previous highest priority waiter or we are the highest priority
- * waiter but failed to get the rtmutex the first time.
+ * waiter but have failed to get the rtmutex the first time.
+ *
* We have to replace the newowner TID in the user space variable.
* This must be atomic as we have to preserve the owner died bit here.
*
@@ -2298,7 +2296,7 @@ static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q,
if (get_futex_value_locked(&uval, uaddr))
goto handle_fault;
- while (1) {
+ for (;;) {
newval = (uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) | newtid;
if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval))
@@ -2394,6 +2392,10 @@ static int fixup_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked)
/*
* Got the lock. We might not be the anticipated owner if we
* did a lock-steal - fix up the PI-state in that case:
+ *
+ * We can safely read pi_state->owner without holding wait_lock
+ * because we now own the rt_mutex, only the owner will attempt
+ * to change it.
*/
if (q->pi_state->owner != current)
ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, current);
@@ -2633,6 +2635,7 @@ static int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
ktime_t *time, int trylock)
{
struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to = NULL;
+ struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = NULL;
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
struct futex_q q = futex_q_init;
int res, ret;
@@ -2719,12 +2722,19 @@ static int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
* If fixup_owner() faulted and was unable to handle the fault, unlock
* it and return the fault to userspace.
*/
- if (ret && (rt_mutex_owner(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex) == current))
- rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
+ if (ret && (rt_mutex_owner(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex) == current)) {
+ pi_state = q.pi_state;
+ get_pi_state(pi_state);
+ }
/* Unqueue and drop the lock */
unqueue_me_pi(&q);
+ if (pi_state) {
+ rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
+ put_pi_state(pi_state);
+ }
+
goto out_put_key;
out_unlock_put_key:
@@ -2787,10 +2797,36 @@ static int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags)
*/
top_waiter = futex_top_waiter(hb, &key);
if (top_waiter) {
- ret = wake_futex_pi(uaddr, uval, top_waiter, hb);
+ struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = top_waiter->pi_state;
+
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ if (!pi_state)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ /*
+ * If current does not own the pi_state then the futex is
+ * inconsistent and user space fiddled with the futex value.
+ */
+ if (pi_state->owner != current)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
/*
- * In case of success wake_futex_pi dropped the hash
- * bucket lock.
+ * Grab a reference on the pi_state and drop hb->lock.
+ *
+ * The reference ensures pi_state lives, dropping the hb->lock
+ * is tricky.. wake_futex_pi() will take rt_mutex::wait_lock to
+ * close the races against futex_lock_pi(), but in case of
+ * _any_ fail we'll abort and retry the whole deal.
+ */
+ get_pi_state(pi_state);
+ spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
+
+ ret = wake_futex_pi(uaddr, uval, pi_state);
+
+ put_pi_state(pi_state);
+
+ /*
+ * Success, we're done! No tricky corner cases.
*/
if (!ret)
goto out_putkey;
@@ -2805,7 +2841,6 @@ static int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags)
* setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit. Try again.
*/
if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
- spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
put_futex_key(&key);
goto retry;
}
@@ -2813,7 +2848,7 @@ static int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags)
* wake_futex_pi has detected invalid state. Tell user
* space.
*/
- goto out_unlock;
+ goto out_putkey;
}
/*
@@ -2823,8 +2858,10 @@ static int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags)
* preserve the WAITERS bit not the OWNER_DIED one. We are the
* owner.
*/
- if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, 0))
+ if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, 0)) {
+ spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
goto pi_faulted;
+ }
/*
* If uval has changed, let user space handle it.
@@ -2838,7 +2875,6 @@ static int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags)
return ret;
pi_faulted:
- spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
put_futex_key(&key);
ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr);
@@ -2942,6 +2978,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
u32 __user *uaddr2)
{
struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to = NULL;
+ struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = NULL;
struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter;
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
union futex_key key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
@@ -3026,8 +3063,10 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
if (q.pi_state && (q.pi_state->owner != current)) {
spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr2, &q, current);
- if (ret && rt_mutex_owner(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex) == current)
- rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
+ if (ret && rt_mutex_owner(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex) == current) {
+ pi_state = q.pi_state;
+ get_pi_state(pi_state);
+ }
/*
* Drop the reference to the pi state which
* the requeue_pi() code acquired for us.
@@ -3066,13 +3105,20 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
* the fault, unlock the rt_mutex and return the fault to
* userspace.
*/
- if (ret && rt_mutex_owner(pi_mutex) == current)
- rt_mutex_futex_unlock(pi_mutex);
+ if (ret && rt_mutex_owner(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex) == current) {
+ pi_state = q.pi_state;
+ get_pi_state(pi_state);
+ }
/* Unqueue and drop the lock. */
unqueue_me_pi(&q);
}
+ if (pi_state) {
+ rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
+ put_pi_state(pi_state);
+ }
+
if (ret == -EINTR) {
/*
* We've already been requeued, but cannot restart by calling
--
2.7.4
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink