Jetpack/kernel/kernel-4.9/rt-patches/0168-futex-Ensure-lock-unlo...

50 lines
1.5 KiB
Diff

From 70a4228ad3c22ce449833a10a651c3ae25422d32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:17:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 168/352] futex: Ensure lock/unlock symetry versus pi_lock and
hash bucket lock
In exit_pi_state_list() we have the following locking construct:
spin_lock(&hb->lock);
raw_spin_lock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
...
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
In !RT this works, but on RT the migrate_enable() function which is
called from spin_unlock() sees atomic context due to the held pi_lock
and just decrements the migrate_disable_atomic counter of the
task. Now the next call to migrate_disable() sees the counter being
negative and issues a warning. That check should be in
migrate_enable() already.
Fix this by dropping pi_lock before unlocking hb->lock and reaquire
pi_lock after that again. This is safe as the loop code reevaluates
head again under the pi_lock.
Reported-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/futex.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 601490b..ee718c3 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -910,7 +910,9 @@ void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr)
* task still owns the PI-state:
*/
if (head->next != next) {
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
continue;
}
--
2.7.4