Directly use yaw controls for it, and don't add it to the allocation matrix,
as that would have an effect on rudder scaling if the wheel also would have
a yaw effectiveness.
Signed-off-by: Silvan Fuhrer <silvan@auterion.com>
This is the control surface type for airframes that have only a
single aileron servo or have the ailerons on a single output channel.
Signed-off-by: Silvan Fuhrer <silvan@auterion.com>
2fbb70d9ca made the lowest possible
throttle value commanded by stick in Stabilized mode before taking off 0.
The real world problem with this is that when takeoff is detected then
the entire throttle scaling range jumps from
[0, MPC_MANTHR_MIN]
to [MPC_MANTHR_MIN, MPC_MANTHR_MIN].
As a result whenever MPC_MANTHR_MIN is not zero there is a thrust jump
on every takeoff just at the moment takeoff is detected even when the
stick is moved continuously.
Because of this I suggest to revert to having a higher throttle value
from the beginning on because it's less complicated and there's
no obvious value in starting out with zero thrust if anyways not
possible to go back to zero for safety once takeoff is detected.
Using the control status flags isn't robust as this part of the code
runs at the EKF update rate while the in_air transition is don at the
prediction rate. It was then likely to miss the transition
Fixes the error
googletest-src/googletest/src/gtest-death-test.cc:1283:24: error: ‘dummy’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
with GCC 11
For most VTOLs the param defaults for the agressiveness of the MC attitude controller
are too high, as VTOLs usually have high intertia and lot af drag due to wings and
can thus not rotate as fast as MCs.
Signed-off-by: Silvan Fuhrer <silvan@auterion.com>
I think most vehicle can safely decend with at least 1.5m/s, and having this
value too low makes Descents/Landings/RTLs unnecessary long.
Signed-off-by: Silvan Fuhrer <silvan@auterion.com>
The VTOL default was set to 1, while the param default is 1.5.
I don't see why it shuold be a different default for VTOLs and thus remove it.
Signed-off-by: Silvan Fuhrer <silvan@auterion.com>
- replace float32[21] URT covariances with smaller dedicated position/velocity/orientation variances (the crossterms are unused, awkward, and relatively costly)
- these are easier to casually inspect and more representative of what's actually being used currently and reduces the size of vehicle_odometry_s quite a bit
- ekf2: add new helper to get roll/pitch/yaw covariances
- mavlink: receiver ODOMETRY handle more frame types for both pose (MAV_FRAME_LOCAL_NED, MAV_FRAME_LOCAL_ENU, MAV_FRAME_LOCAL_FRD, MAV_FRAME_LOCAL_FLU) and velocity (MAV_FRAME_LOCAL_NED, MAV_FRAME_LOCAL_ENU, MAV_FRAME_LOCAL_FRD, MAV_FRAME_LOCAL_FLU, MAV_FRAME_BODY_FRD)
- mavlink: delete unused ATT_POS_MOCAP stream (this is just a passthrough)
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Bresciani <brescianimathieu@gmail.com>
Daniel Agar
bresch
Silvan Fuhrer
Junwoo Hwang
Beat Küng
Oleg
David Sidrane
Matthias Grob
marcirsch
Jaeyoung Lim
Jukka Laitinen
Thomas Stastny