PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: suggestion to make it more "concise"

This commit is contained in:
Matthias Grob 2022-11-08 16:56:55 +01:00
parent 9c0e09c3df
commit fd4d4e001d
1 changed files with 24 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -1,17 +1,29 @@
Please use [PX4 Discuss](http://discuss.px4.io/) or [Discord](https://discord.gg/dronecode) to align on pull requests if necessary. You can then open draft pull requests to get early feedback. <!--
## Describe problem solved by this pull request Thank you for your contribution!
A clear and concise description of the problem this proposed change will solve. Or, what it will improve.
E.g. For this use case I ran into...
## Describe your solution Get early feedback through
A clear and concise description of what you have implemented. - Dronecode Discord: https://discord.gg/dronecode
- PX4 Discuss: http://discuss.px4.io/
- opening a draft pr and sharing the link
## Describe possible alternatives -->
A clear and concise description of alternative solutions or features you've considered.
## Test data / coverage ### Solved Problem
How was it tested? What cases were covered? Logs uploaded to https://review.px4.io/ and screenshots of the important plot parts. When ... I found that ...
## Additional context Fixes #{Github issue ID}
Add any other related context or media.
### Solution
- Add ... for ...
- Refactor ...
### Alternatives
We could also ...
### Test coverage
- Unit/integration test: ...
- Simulation/hardware testing logs: https://review.px4.io/
### Context
Related links, screenshot before/after, video