mirror of https://github.com/python/cpython
287 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText
287 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. highlightlang:: c
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _embedding:
|
|
|
|
***************************************
|
|
Embedding Python in Another Application
|
|
***************************************
|
|
|
|
The previous chapters discussed how to extend Python, that is, how to extend the
|
|
functionality of Python by attaching a library of C functions to it. It is also
|
|
possible to do it the other way around: enrich your C/C++ application by
|
|
embedding Python in it. Embedding provides your application with the ability to
|
|
implement some of the functionality of your application in Python rather than C
|
|
or C++. This can be used for many purposes; one example would be to allow users
|
|
to tailor the application to their needs by writing some scripts in Python. You
|
|
can also use it yourself if some of the functionality can be written in Python
|
|
more easily.
|
|
|
|
Embedding Python is similar to extending it, but not quite. The difference is
|
|
that when you extend Python, the main program of the application is still the
|
|
Python interpreter, while if you embed Python, the main program may have nothing
|
|
to do with Python --- instead, some parts of the application occasionally call
|
|
the Python interpreter to run some Python code.
|
|
|
|
So if you are embedding Python, you are providing your own main program. One of
|
|
the things this main program has to do is initialize the Python interpreter. At
|
|
the very least, you have to call the function :cfunc:`Py_Initialize` (on Mac OS,
|
|
call :cfunc:`PyMac_Initialize` instead). There are optional calls to pass
|
|
command line arguments to Python. Then later you can call the interpreter from
|
|
any part of the application.
|
|
|
|
There are several different ways to call the interpreter: you can pass a string
|
|
containing Python statements to :cfunc:`PyRun_SimpleString`, or you can pass a
|
|
stdio file pointer and a file name (for identification in error messages only)
|
|
to :cfunc:`PyRun_SimpleFile`. You can also call the lower-level operations
|
|
described in the previous chapters to construct and use Python objects.
|
|
|
|
A simple demo of embedding Python can be found in the directory
|
|
:file:`Demo/embed/` of the source distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. seealso::
|
|
|
|
:ref:`c-api-index`
|
|
The details of Python's C interface are given in this manual. A great deal of
|
|
necessary information can be found here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _high-level-embedding:
|
|
|
|
Very High Level Embedding
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
The simplest form of embedding Python is the use of the very high level
|
|
interface. This interface is intended to execute a Python script without needing
|
|
to interact with the application directly. This can for example be used to
|
|
perform some operation on a file. ::
|
|
|
|
#include <Python.h>
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
main(int argc, char *argv[])
|
|
{
|
|
Py_Initialize();
|
|
PyRun_SimpleString("from time import time,ctime\n"
|
|
"print('Today is', ctime(time()))\n");
|
|
Py_Finalize();
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The above code first initializes the Python interpreter with
|
|
:cfunc:`Py_Initialize`, followed by the execution of a hard-coded Python script
|
|
that print the date and time. Afterwards, the :cfunc:`Py_Finalize` call shuts
|
|
the interpreter down, followed by the end of the program. In a real program,
|
|
you may want to get the Python script from another source, perhaps a text-editor
|
|
routine, a file, or a database. Getting the Python code from a file can better
|
|
be done by using the :cfunc:`PyRun_SimpleFile` function, which saves you the
|
|
trouble of allocating memory space and loading the file contents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _lower-level-embedding:
|
|
|
|
Beyond Very High Level Embedding: An overview
|
|
=============================================
|
|
|
|
The high level interface gives you the ability to execute arbitrary pieces of
|
|
Python code from your application, but exchanging data values is quite
|
|
cumbersome to say the least. If you want that, you should use lower level calls.
|
|
At the cost of having to write more C code, you can achieve almost anything.
|
|
|
|
It should be noted that extending Python and embedding Python is quite the same
|
|
activity, despite the different intent. Most topics discussed in the previous
|
|
chapters are still valid. To show this, consider what the extension code from
|
|
Python to C really does:
|
|
|
|
#. Convert data values from Python to C,
|
|
|
|
#. Perform a function call to a C routine using the converted values, and
|
|
|
|
#. Convert the data values from the call from C to Python.
|
|
|
|
When embedding Python, the interface code does:
|
|
|
|
#. Convert data values from C to Python,
|
|
|
|
#. Perform a function call to a Python interface routine using the converted
|
|
values, and
|
|
|
|
#. Convert the data values from the call from Python to C.
|
|
|
|
As you can see, the data conversion steps are simply swapped to accommodate the
|
|
different direction of the cross-language transfer. The only difference is the
|
|
routine that you call between both data conversions. When extending, you call a
|
|
C routine, when embedding, you call a Python routine.
|
|
|
|
This chapter will not discuss how to convert data from Python to C and vice
|
|
versa. Also, proper use of references and dealing with errors is assumed to be
|
|
understood. Since these aspects do not differ from extending the interpreter,
|
|
you can refer to earlier chapters for the required information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _pure-embedding:
|
|
|
|
Pure Embedding
|
|
==============
|
|
|
|
The first program aims to execute a function in a Python script. Like in the
|
|
section about the very high level interface, the Python interpreter does not
|
|
directly interact with the application (but that will change in the next
|
|
section).
|
|
|
|
The code to run a function defined in a Python script is:
|
|
|
|
.. literalinclude:: ../includes/run-func.c
|
|
|
|
|
|
This code loads a Python script using ``argv[1]``, and calls the function named
|
|
in ``argv[2]``. Its integer arguments are the other values of the ``argv``
|
|
array. If you compile and link this program (let's call the finished executable
|
|
:program:`call`), and use it to execute a Python script, such as::
|
|
|
|
def multiply(a,b):
|
|
print("Will compute", a, "times", b)
|
|
c = 0
|
|
for i in range(0, a):
|
|
c = c + b
|
|
return c
|
|
|
|
then the result should be::
|
|
|
|
$ call multiply multiply 3 2
|
|
Will compute 3 times 2
|
|
Result of call: 6
|
|
|
|
Although the program is quite large for its functionality, most of the code is
|
|
for data conversion between Python and C, and for error reporting. The
|
|
interesting part with respect to embedding Python starts with ::
|
|
|
|
Py_Initialize();
|
|
pName = PyString_FromString(argv[1]);
|
|
/* Error checking of pName left out */
|
|
pModule = PyImport_Import(pName);
|
|
|
|
After initializing the interpreter, the script is loaded using
|
|
:cfunc:`PyImport_Import`. This routine needs a Python string as its argument,
|
|
which is constructed using the :cfunc:`PyString_FromString` data conversion
|
|
routine. ::
|
|
|
|
pFunc = PyObject_GetAttrString(pModule, argv[2]);
|
|
/* pFunc is a new reference */
|
|
|
|
if (pFunc && PyCallable_Check(pFunc)) {
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
Py_XDECREF(pFunc);
|
|
|
|
Once the script is loaded, the name we're looking for is retrieved using
|
|
:cfunc:`PyObject_GetAttrString`. If the name exists, and the object returned is
|
|
callable, you can safely assume that it is a function. The program then
|
|
proceeds by constructing a tuple of arguments as normal. The call to the Python
|
|
function is then made with::
|
|
|
|
pValue = PyObject_CallObject(pFunc, pArgs);
|
|
|
|
Upon return of the function, ``pValue`` is either *NULL* or it contains a
|
|
reference to the return value of the function. Be sure to release the reference
|
|
after examining the value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _extending-with-embedding:
|
|
|
|
Extending Embedded Python
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
Until now, the embedded Python interpreter had no access to functionality from
|
|
the application itself. The Python API allows this by extending the embedded
|
|
interpreter. That is, the embedded interpreter gets extended with routines
|
|
provided by the application. While it sounds complex, it is not so bad. Simply
|
|
forget for a while that the application starts the Python interpreter. Instead,
|
|
consider the application to be a set of subroutines, and write some glue code
|
|
that gives Python access to those routines, just like you would write a normal
|
|
Python extension. For example::
|
|
|
|
static int numargs=0;
|
|
|
|
/* Return the number of arguments of the application command line */
|
|
static PyObject*
|
|
emb_numargs(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
|
|
{
|
|
if(!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, ":numargs"))
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
return Py_BuildValue("i", numargs);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static PyMethodDef EmbMethods[] = {
|
|
{"numargs", emb_numargs, METH_VARARGS,
|
|
"Return the number of arguments received by the process."},
|
|
{NULL, NULL, 0, NULL}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
Insert the above code just above the :cfunc:`main` function. Also, insert the
|
|
following two statements directly after :cfunc:`Py_Initialize`::
|
|
|
|
numargs = argc;
|
|
Py_InitModule("emb", EmbMethods);
|
|
|
|
These two lines initialize the ``numargs`` variable, and make the
|
|
:func:`emb.numargs` function accessible to the embedded Python interpreter.
|
|
With these extensions, the Python script can do things like ::
|
|
|
|
import emb
|
|
print("Number of arguments", emb.numargs())
|
|
|
|
In a real application, the methods will expose an API of the application to
|
|
Python.
|
|
|
|
.. TODO: threads, code examples do not really behave well if errors happen
|
|
(what to watch out for)
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _embeddingincplusplus:
|
|
|
|
Embedding Python in C++
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
It is also possible to embed Python in a C++ program; precisely how this is done
|
|
will depend on the details of the C++ system used; in general you will need to
|
|
write the main program in C++, and use the C++ compiler to compile and link your
|
|
program. There is no need to recompile Python itself using C++.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _link-reqs:
|
|
|
|
Linking Requirements
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
While the :program:`configure` script shipped with the Python sources will
|
|
correctly build Python to export the symbols needed by dynamically linked
|
|
extensions, this is not automatically inherited by applications which embed the
|
|
Python library statically, at least on Unix. This is an issue when the
|
|
application is linked to the static runtime library (:file:`libpython.a`) and
|
|
needs to load dynamic extensions (implemented as :file:`.so` files).
|
|
|
|
The problem is that some entry points are defined by the Python runtime solely
|
|
for extension modules to use. If the embedding application does not use any of
|
|
these entry points, some linkers will not include those entries in the symbol
|
|
table of the finished executable. Some additional options are needed to inform
|
|
the linker not to remove these symbols.
|
|
|
|
Determining the right options to use for any given platform can be quite
|
|
difficult, but fortunately the Python configuration already has those values.
|
|
To retrieve them from an installed Python interpreter, start an interactive
|
|
interpreter and have a short session like this::
|
|
|
|
>>> import distutils.sysconfig
|
|
>>> distutils.sysconfig.get_config_var('LINKFORSHARED')
|
|
'-Xlinker -export-dynamic'
|
|
|
|
.. index:: module: distutils.sysconfig
|
|
|
|
The contents of the string presented will be the options that should be used.
|
|
If the string is empty, there's no need to add any additional options. The
|
|
:const:`LINKFORSHARED` definition corresponds to the variable of the same name
|
|
in Python's top-level :file:`Makefile`.
|
|
|