mirror of https://github.com/python/cpython
1746 lines
65 KiB
TeX
1746 lines
65 KiB
TeX
\documentclass{howto}
|
|
\usepackage{distutils}
|
|
% $Id$
|
|
|
|
% Writing context managers
|
|
% The easy_install stuff
|
|
% Stateful codec changes
|
|
% Fix XXX comments
|
|
% Count up the patches and bugs
|
|
|
|
\title{What's New in Python 2.5}
|
|
\release{0.1}
|
|
\author{A.M. Kuchling}
|
|
\authoraddress{\email{amk@amk.ca}}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
\maketitle
|
|
\tableofcontents
|
|
|
|
This article explains the new features in Python 2.5. No release date
|
|
for Python 2.5 has been set; it will probably be released in the
|
|
autumn of 2006. \pep{356} describes the planned release schedule.
|
|
|
|
(This is still an early draft, and some sections are still skeletal or
|
|
completely missing. Comments on the present material will still be
|
|
welcomed.)
|
|
|
|
% XXX Compare with previous release in 2 - 3 sentences here.
|
|
|
|
This article doesn't attempt to provide a complete specification of
|
|
the new features, but instead provides a convenient overview. For
|
|
full details, you should refer to the documentation for Python 2.5.
|
|
% XXX add hyperlink when the documentation becomes available online.
|
|
If you want to understand the complete implementation and design
|
|
rationale, refer to the PEP for a particular new feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{PEP 243: Uploading Modules to PyPI}
|
|
|
|
PEP 243 describes an HTTP-based protocol for submitting software
|
|
packages to a central archive. The Python package index at
|
|
\url{http://cheeseshop.python.org} now supports package uploads, and
|
|
the new \command{upload} Distutils command will upload a package to the
|
|
repository.
|
|
|
|
Before a package can be uploaded, you must be able to build a
|
|
distribution using the \command{sdist} Distutils command. Once that
|
|
works, you can run \code{python setup.py upload} to add your package
|
|
to the PyPI archive. Optionally you can GPG-sign the package by
|
|
supplying the \programopt{--sign} and
|
|
\programopt{--identity} options.
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{243}{Module Repository Upload Mechanism}{PEP written by
|
|
Sean Reifschneider; implemented by Martin von~L\"owis
|
|
and Richard Jones. Note that the PEP doesn't exactly
|
|
describe what's implemented in PyPI.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{PEP 308: Conditional Expressions}
|
|
|
|
For a long time, people have been requesting a way to write
|
|
conditional expressions, expressions that return value A or value B
|
|
depending on whether a Boolean value is true or false. A conditional
|
|
expression lets you write a single assignment statement that has the
|
|
same effect as the following:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
if condition:
|
|
x = true_value
|
|
else:
|
|
x = false_value
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
There have been endless tedious discussions of syntax on both
|
|
python-dev and comp.lang.python. A vote was even held that found the
|
|
majority of voters wanted conditional expressions in some form,
|
|
but there was no syntax that was preferred by a clear majority.
|
|
Candidates included C's \code{cond ? true_v : false_v},
|
|
\code{if cond then true_v else false_v}, and 16 other variations.
|
|
|
|
GvR eventually chose a surprising syntax:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
x = true_value if condition else false_value
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Evaluation is still lazy as in existing Boolean expressions, so the
|
|
order of evaluation jumps around a bit. The \var{condition}
|
|
expression in the middle is evaluated first, and the \var{true_value}
|
|
expression is evaluated only if the condition was true. Similarly,
|
|
the \var{false_value} expression is only evaluated when the condition
|
|
is false.
|
|
|
|
This syntax may seem strange and backwards; why does the condition go
|
|
in the \emph{middle} of the expression, and not in the front as in C's
|
|
\code{c ? x : y}? The decision was checked by applying the new syntax
|
|
to the modules in the standard library and seeing how the resulting
|
|
code read. In many cases where a conditional expression is used, one
|
|
value seems to be the 'common case' and one value is an 'exceptional
|
|
case', used only on rarer occasions when the condition isn't met. The
|
|
conditional syntax makes this pattern a bit more obvious:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
contents = ((doc + '\n') if doc else '')
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
I read the above statement as meaning ``here \var{contents} is
|
|
usually assigned a value of \code{doc+'\e n'}; sometimes
|
|
\var{doc} is empty, in which special case an empty string is returned.''
|
|
I doubt I will use conditional expressions very often where there
|
|
isn't a clear common and uncommon case.
|
|
|
|
There was some discussion of whether the language should require
|
|
surrounding conditional expressions with parentheses. The decision
|
|
was made to \emph{not} require parentheses in the Python language's
|
|
grammar, but as a matter of style I think you should always use them.
|
|
Consider these two statements:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
# First version -- no parens
|
|
level = 1 if logging else 0
|
|
|
|
# Second version -- with parens
|
|
level = (1 if logging else 0)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
In the first version, I think a reader's eye might group the statement
|
|
into 'level = 1', 'if logging', 'else 0', and think that the condition
|
|
decides whether the assignment to \var{level} is performed. The
|
|
second version reads better, in my opinion, because it makes it clear
|
|
that the assignment is always performed and the choice is being made
|
|
between two values.
|
|
|
|
Another reason for including the brackets: a few odd combinations of
|
|
list comprehensions and lambdas could look like incorrect conditional
|
|
expressions. See \pep{308} for some examples. If you put parentheses
|
|
around your conditional expressions, you won't run into this case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{308}{Conditional Expressions}{PEP written by
|
|
Guido van Rossum and Raymond D. Hettinger; implemented by Thomas
|
|
Wouters.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{PEP 309: Partial Function Application}
|
|
|
|
The \module{functional} module is intended to contain tools for
|
|
functional-style programming. Currently it only contains a
|
|
\class{partial()} function, but new functions will probably be added
|
|
in future versions of Python.
|
|
|
|
For programs written in a functional style, it can be useful to
|
|
construct variants of existing functions that have some of the
|
|
parameters filled in. Consider a Python function \code{f(a, b, c)};
|
|
you could create a new function \code{g(b, c)} that was equivalent to
|
|
\code{f(1, b, c)}. This is called ``partial function application'',
|
|
and is provided by the \class{partial} class in the new
|
|
\module{functional} module.
|
|
|
|
The constructor for \class{partial} takes the arguments
|
|
\code{(\var{function}, \var{arg1}, \var{arg2}, ...
|
|
\var{kwarg1}=\var{value1}, \var{kwarg2}=\var{value2})}. The resulting
|
|
object is callable, so you can just call it to invoke \var{function}
|
|
with the filled-in arguments.
|
|
|
|
Here's a small but realistic example:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
import functional
|
|
|
|
def log (message, subsystem):
|
|
"Write the contents of 'message' to the specified subsystem."
|
|
print '%s: %s' % (subsystem, message)
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
server_log = functional.partial(log, subsystem='server')
|
|
server_log('Unable to open socket')
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Here's another example, from a program that uses PyGTk. Here a
|
|
context-sensitive pop-up menu is being constructed dynamically. The
|
|
callback provided for the menu option is a partially applied version
|
|
of the \method{open_item()} method, where the first argument has been
|
|
provided.
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
...
|
|
class Application:
|
|
def open_item(self, path):
|
|
...
|
|
def init (self):
|
|
open_func = functional.partial(self.open_item, item_path)
|
|
popup_menu.append( ("Open", open_func, 1) )
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{309}{Partial Function Application}{PEP proposed and written by
|
|
Peter Harris; implemented by Hye-Shik Chang, with adaptations by
|
|
Raymond Hettinger.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{PEP 314: Metadata for Python Software Packages v1.1}
|
|
|
|
Some simple dependency support was added to Distutils. The
|
|
\function{setup()} function now has \code{requires}, \code{provides},
|
|
and \code{obsoletes} keyword parameters. When you build a source
|
|
distribution using the \code{sdist} command, the dependency
|
|
information will be recorded in the \file{PKG-INFO} file.
|
|
|
|
Another new keyword parameter is \code{download_url}, which should be
|
|
set to a URL for the package's source code. This means it's now
|
|
possible to look up an entry in the package index, determine the
|
|
dependencies for a package, and download the required packages.
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
VERSION = '1.0'
|
|
setup(name='PyPackage',
|
|
version=VERSION,
|
|
requires=['numarray', 'zlib (>=1.1.4)'],
|
|
obsoletes=['OldPackage']
|
|
download_url=('http://www.example.com/pypackage/dist/pkg-%s.tar.gz'
|
|
% VERSION),
|
|
)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{314}{Metadata for Python Software Packages v1.1}{PEP proposed
|
|
and written by A.M. Kuchling, Richard Jones, and Fred Drake;
|
|
implemented by Richard Jones and Fred Drake.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{PEP 328: Absolute and Relative Imports}
|
|
|
|
The simpler part of PEP 328 was implemented in Python 2.4: parentheses
|
|
could now be used to enclose the names imported from a module using
|
|
the \code{from ... import ...} statement, making it easier to import
|
|
many different names.
|
|
|
|
The more complicated part has been implemented in Python 2.5:
|
|
importing a module can be specified to use absolute or
|
|
package-relative imports. The plan is to move toward making absolute
|
|
imports the default in future versions of Python.
|
|
|
|
Let's say you have a package directory like this:
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
pkg/
|
|
pkg/__init__.py
|
|
pkg/main.py
|
|
pkg/string.py
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
This defines a package named \module{pkg} containing the
|
|
\module{pkg.main} and \module{pkg.string} submodules.
|
|
|
|
Consider the code in the \file{main.py} module. What happens if it
|
|
executes the statement \code{import string}? In Python 2.4 and
|
|
earlier, it will first look in the package's directory to perform a
|
|
relative import, finds \file{pkg/string.py}, imports the contents of
|
|
that file as the \module{pkg.string} module, and that module is bound
|
|
to the name \samp{string} in the \module{pkg.main} module's namespace.
|
|
|
|
That's fine if \module{pkg.string} was what you wanted. But what if
|
|
you wanted Python's standard \module{string} module? There's no clean
|
|
way to ignore \module{pkg.string} and look for the standard module;
|
|
generally you had to look at the contents of \code{sys.modules}, which
|
|
is slightly unclean.
|
|
Holger Krekel's \module{py.std} package provides a tidier way to perform
|
|
imports from the standard library, \code{import py ; py.std.string.join()},
|
|
but that package isn't available on all Python installations.
|
|
|
|
Reading code which relies on relative imports is also less clear,
|
|
because a reader may be confused about which module, \module{string}
|
|
or \module{pkg.string}, is intended to be used. Python users soon
|
|
learned not to duplicate the names of standard library modules in the
|
|
names of their packages' submodules, but you can't protect against
|
|
having your submodule's name being used for a new module added in a
|
|
future version of Python.
|
|
|
|
In Python 2.5, you can switch \keyword{import}'s behaviour to
|
|
absolute imports using a \code{from __future__ import absolute_import}
|
|
directive. This absolute-import behaviour will become the default in
|
|
a future version (probably Python 2.7). Once absolute imports
|
|
are the default, \code{import string} will
|
|
always find the standard library's version.
|
|
It's suggested that users should begin using absolute imports as much
|
|
as possible, so it's preferable to begin writing \code{from pkg import
|
|
string} in your code.
|
|
|
|
Relative imports are still possible by adding a leading period
|
|
to the module name when using the \code{from ... import} form:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
# Import names from pkg.string
|
|
from .string import name1, name2
|
|
# Import pkg.string
|
|
from . import string
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
This imports the \module{string} module relative to the current
|
|
package, so in \module{pkg.main} this will import \var{name1} and
|
|
\var{name2} from \module{pkg.string}. Additional leading periods
|
|
perform the relative import starting from the parent of the current
|
|
package. For example, code in the \module{A.B.C} module can do:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
from . import D # Imports A.B.D
|
|
from .. import E # Imports A.E
|
|
from ..F import G # Imports A.F.G
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Leading periods cannot be used with the \code{import \var{modname}}
|
|
form of the import statement, only the \code{from ... import} form.
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{328}{Imports: Multi-Line and Absolute/Relative}
|
|
{PEP written by Aahz; implemented by Thomas Wouters.}
|
|
|
|
\seeurl{http://codespeak.net/py/current/doc/index.html}
|
|
{The py library by Holger Krekel, which contains the \module{py.std} package.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{PEP 338: Executing Modules as Scripts}
|
|
|
|
The \programopt{-m} switch added in Python 2.4 to execute a module as
|
|
a script gained a few more abilities. Instead of being implemented in
|
|
C code inside the Python interpreter, the switch now uses an
|
|
implementation in a new module, \module{runpy}.
|
|
|
|
The \module{runpy} module implements a more sophisticated import
|
|
mechanism so that it's now possible to run modules in a package such
|
|
as \module{pychecker.checker}. The module also supports alternative
|
|
import mechanisms such as the \module{zipimport} module. This means
|
|
you can add a .zip archive's path to \code{sys.path} and then use the
|
|
\programopt{-m} switch to execute code from the archive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{338}{Executing modules as scripts}{PEP written and
|
|
implemented by Nick Coghlan.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{PEP 341: Unified try/except/finally}
|
|
|
|
Until Python 2.5, the \keyword{try} statement came in two
|
|
flavours. You could use a \keyword{finally} block to ensure that code
|
|
is always executed, or one or more \keyword{except} blocks to catch
|
|
specific exceptions. You couldn't combine both \keyword{except} blocks and a
|
|
\keyword{finally} block, because generating the right bytecode for the
|
|
combined version was complicated and it wasn't clear what the
|
|
semantics of the combined should be.
|
|
|
|
GvR spent some time working with Java, which does support the
|
|
equivalent of combining \keyword{except} blocks and a
|
|
\keyword{finally} block, and this clarified what the statement should
|
|
mean. In Python 2.5, you can now write:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
try:
|
|
block-1 ...
|
|
except Exception1:
|
|
handler-1 ...
|
|
except Exception2:
|
|
handler-2 ...
|
|
else:
|
|
else-block
|
|
finally:
|
|
final-block
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The code in \var{block-1} is executed. If the code raises an
|
|
exception, the handlers are tried in order: \var{handler-1},
|
|
\var{handler-2}, ... If no exception is raised, the \var{else-block}
|
|
is executed. No matter what happened previously, the
|
|
\var{final-block} is executed once the code block is complete and any
|
|
raised exceptions handled. Even if there's an error in an exception
|
|
handler or the \var{else-block} and a new exception is raised, the
|
|
\var{final-block} is still executed.
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{341}{Unifying try-except and try-finally}{PEP written by Georg Brandl;
|
|
implementation by Thomas Lee.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{PEP 342: New Generator Features\label{section-generators}}
|
|
|
|
Python 2.5 adds a simple way to pass values \emph{into} a generator.
|
|
As introduced in Python 2.3, generators only produce output; once a
|
|
generator's code is invoked to create an iterator, there's no way to
|
|
pass any new information into the function when its execution is
|
|
resumed. Sometimes the ability to pass in some information would be
|
|
useful. Hackish solutions to this include making the generator's code
|
|
look at a global variable and then changing the global variable's
|
|
value, or passing in some mutable object that callers then modify.
|
|
|
|
To refresh your memory of basic generators, here's a simple example:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
def counter (maximum):
|
|
i = 0
|
|
while i < maximum:
|
|
yield i
|
|
i += 1
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
When you call \code{counter(10)}, the result is an iterator that
|
|
returns the values from 0 up to 9. On encountering the
|
|
\keyword{yield} statement, the iterator returns the provided value and
|
|
suspends the function's execution, preserving the local variables.
|
|
Execution resumes on the following call to the iterator's
|
|
\method{next()} method, picking up after the \keyword{yield} statement.
|
|
|
|
In Python 2.3, \keyword{yield} was a statement; it didn't return any
|
|
value. In 2.5, \keyword{yield} is now an expression, returning a
|
|
value that can be assigned to a variable or otherwise operated on:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
val = (yield i)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
I recommend that you always put parentheses around a \keyword{yield}
|
|
expression when you're doing something with the returned value, as in
|
|
the above example. The parentheses aren't always necessary, but it's
|
|
easier to always add them instead of having to remember when they're
|
|
needed.\footnote{The exact rules are that a \keyword{yield}-expression must
|
|
always be parenthesized except when it occurs at the top-level
|
|
expression on the right-hand side of an assignment, meaning you can
|
|
write \code{val = yield i} but have to use parentheses when there's an
|
|
operation, as in \code{val = (yield i) + 12}.}
|
|
|
|
Values are sent into a generator by calling its
|
|
\method{send(\var{value})} method. The generator's code is then
|
|
resumed and the \keyword{yield} expression returns the specified
|
|
\var{value}. If the regular \method{next()} method is called, the
|
|
\keyword{yield} returns \constant{None}.
|
|
|
|
Here's the previous example, modified to allow changing the value of
|
|
the internal counter.
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
def counter (maximum):
|
|
i = 0
|
|
while i < maximum:
|
|
val = (yield i)
|
|
# If value provided, change counter
|
|
if val is not None:
|
|
i = val
|
|
else:
|
|
i += 1
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
And here's an example of changing the counter:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
>>> it = counter(10)
|
|
>>> print it.next()
|
|
0
|
|
>>> print it.next()
|
|
1
|
|
>>> print it.send(8)
|
|
8
|
|
>>> print it.next()
|
|
9
|
|
>>> print it.next()
|
|
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
|
File ``t.py'', line 15, in ?
|
|
print it.next()
|
|
StopIteration
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Because \keyword{yield} will often be returning \constant{None}, you
|
|
should always check for this case. Don't just use its value in
|
|
expressions unless you're sure that the \method{send()} method
|
|
will be the only method used resume your generator function.
|
|
|
|
In addition to \method{send()}, there are two other new methods on
|
|
generators:
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\item \method{throw(\var{type}, \var{value}=None,
|
|
\var{traceback}=None)} is used to raise an exception inside the
|
|
generator; the exception is raised by the \keyword{yield} expression
|
|
where the generator's execution is paused.
|
|
|
|
\item \method{close()} raises a new \exception{GeneratorExit}
|
|
exception inside the generator to terminate the iteration.
|
|
On receiving this
|
|
exception, the generator's code must either raise
|
|
\exception{GeneratorExit} or \exception{StopIteration}; catching the
|
|
exception and doing anything else is illegal and will trigger
|
|
a \exception{RuntimeError}. \method{close()} will also be called by
|
|
Python's garbage collection when the generator is garbage-collected.
|
|
|
|
If you need to run cleanup code in case of a \exception{GeneratorExit},
|
|
I suggest using a \code{try: ... finally:} suite instead of
|
|
catching \exception{GeneratorExit}.
|
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
The cumulative effect of these changes is to turn generators from
|
|
one-way producers of information into both producers and consumers.
|
|
|
|
Generators also become \emph{coroutines}, a more generalized form of
|
|
subroutines. Subroutines are entered at one point and exited at
|
|
another point (the top of the function, and a \keyword{return
|
|
statement}), but coroutines can be entered, exited, and resumed at
|
|
many different points (the \keyword{yield} statements). We'll have to
|
|
figure out patterns for using coroutines effectively in Python.
|
|
|
|
The addition of the \method{close()} method has one side effect that
|
|
isn't obvious. \method{close()} is called when a generator is
|
|
garbage-collected, so this means the generator's code gets one last
|
|
chance to run before the generator is destroyed. This last chance
|
|
means that \code{try...finally} statements in generators can now be
|
|
guaranteed to work; the \keyword{finally} clause will now always get a
|
|
chance to run. The syntactic restriction that you couldn't mix
|
|
\keyword{yield} statements with a \code{try...finally} suite has
|
|
therefore been removed. This seems like a minor bit of language
|
|
trivia, but using generators and \code{try...finally} is actually
|
|
necessary in order to implement the \keyword{with} statement
|
|
described by PEP 343. We'll look at this new statement in the following
|
|
section.
|
|
|
|
Another even more esoteric effect of this change: previously, the
|
|
\member{gi_frame} attribute of a generator was always a frame object.
|
|
It's now possible for \member{gi_frame} to be \code{None}
|
|
once the generator has been exhausted.
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{342}{Coroutines via Enhanced Generators}{PEP written by
|
|
Guido van Rossum and Phillip J. Eby;
|
|
implemented by Phillip J. Eby. Includes examples of
|
|
some fancier uses of generators as coroutines.}
|
|
|
|
\seeurl{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coroutine}{The Wikipedia entry for
|
|
coroutines.}
|
|
|
|
\seeurl{http://www.sidhe.org/\~{}dan/blog/archives/000178.html}{An
|
|
explanation of coroutines from a Perl point of view, written by Dan
|
|
Sugalski.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{PEP 343: The 'with' statement}
|
|
|
|
The \keyword{with} statement allows a clearer
|
|
version of code that uses \code{try...finally} blocks
|
|
|
|
First, I'll discuss the statement as it will commonly be used, and
|
|
then I'll discuss the detailed implementation and how to write objects
|
|
(called ``context managers'') that can be used with this statement.
|
|
Most people, who will only use \keyword{with} in company with an
|
|
existing object, don't need to know these details and can
|
|
just use objects that are documented to work as context managers.
|
|
Authors of new context managers will need to understand the details of
|
|
the underlying implementation.
|
|
|
|
The \keyword{with} statement is a new control-flow structure whose
|
|
basic structure is:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
with expression as variable:
|
|
with-block
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The expression is evaluated, and it should result in a type of object
|
|
that's called a context manager. The context manager can return a
|
|
value that will be bound to the name \var{variable}. (Note carefully:
|
|
\var{variable} is \emph{not} assigned the result of \var{expression}.
|
|
One method of the context manager is run before \var{with-block} is
|
|
executed, and another method is run after the block is done, even if
|
|
the block raised an exception.
|
|
|
|
To enable the statement in Python 2.5, you need
|
|
to add the following directive to your module:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
from __future__ import with_statement
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Some standard Python objects can now behave as context managers. For
|
|
example, file objects:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
with open('/etc/passwd', 'r') as f:
|
|
for line in f:
|
|
print line
|
|
|
|
# f has been automatically closed at this point.
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The \module{threading} module's locks and condition variables
|
|
also support the \keyword{with} statement:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
lock = threading.Lock()
|
|
with lock:
|
|
# Critical section of code
|
|
...
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The lock is acquired before the block is executed, and released once
|
|
the block is complete.
|
|
|
|
The \module{decimal} module's contexts, which encapsulate the desired
|
|
precision and rounding characteristics for computations, can also be
|
|
used as context managers.
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
import decimal
|
|
|
|
v1 = decimal.Decimal('578')
|
|
|
|
# Displays with default precision of 28 digits
|
|
print v1.sqrt()
|
|
|
|
with decimal.Context(prec=16):
|
|
# All code in this block uses a precision of 16 digits.
|
|
# The original context is restored on exiting the block.
|
|
print v1.sqrt()
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Writing Context Managers}
|
|
|
|
% XXX write this
|
|
|
|
This section still needs to be written.
|
|
|
|
The new \module{contextlib} module provides some functions and a
|
|
decorator that are useful for writing context managers.
|
|
Future versions will go into more detail.
|
|
|
|
% XXX describe further
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{343}{The ``with'' statement}{PEP written by
|
|
Guido van Rossum and Nick Coghlan. }
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{PEP 352: Exceptions as New-Style Classes}
|
|
|
|
Exception classes can now be new-style classes, not just classic
|
|
classes, and the built-in \exception{Exception} class and all the
|
|
standard built-in exceptions (\exception{NameError},
|
|
\exception{ValueError}, etc.) are now new-style classes.
|
|
|
|
The inheritance hierarchy for exceptions has been rearranged a bit.
|
|
In 2.5, the inheritance relationships are:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
BaseException # New in Python 2.5
|
|
|- KeyboardInterrupt
|
|
|- SystemExit
|
|
|- Exception
|
|
|- (all other current built-in exceptions)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
This rearrangement was done because people often want to catch all
|
|
exceptions that indicate program errors. \exception{KeyboardInterrupt} and
|
|
\exception{SystemExit} aren't errors, though, and usually represent an explicit
|
|
action such as the user hitting Control-C or code calling
|
|
\function{sys.exit()}. A bare \code{except:} will catch all exceptions,
|
|
so you commonly need to list \exception{KeyboardInterrupt} and
|
|
\exception{SystemExit} in order to re-raise them. The usual pattern is:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
try:
|
|
...
|
|
except (KeyboardInterrupt, SystemExit):
|
|
raise
|
|
except:
|
|
# Log error...
|
|
# Continue running program...
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
In Python 2.5, you can now write \code{except Exception} to achieve
|
|
the same result, catching all the exceptions that usually indicate errors
|
|
but leaving \exception{KeyboardInterrupt} and
|
|
\exception{SystemExit} alone. As in previous versions,
|
|
a bare \code{except:} still catches all exceptions.
|
|
|
|
The goal for Python 3.0 is to require any class raised as an exception
|
|
to derive from \exception{BaseException} or some descendant of
|
|
\exception{BaseException}, and future releases in the
|
|
Python 2.x series may begin to enforce this constraint. Therefore, I
|
|
suggest you begin making all your exception classes derive from
|
|
\exception{Exception} now. It's been suggested that the bare
|
|
\code{except:} form should be removed in Python 3.0, but Guido van~Rossum
|
|
hasn't decided whether to do this or not.
|
|
|
|
Raising of strings as exceptions, as in the statement \code{raise
|
|
"Error occurred"}, is deprecated in Python 2.5 and will trigger a
|
|
warning. The aim is to be able to remove the string-exception feature
|
|
in a few releases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{352}{Required Superclass for Exceptions}{PEP written by
|
|
Brett Cannon and Guido van Rossum; implemented by Brett Cannon.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{PEP 353: Using ssize_t as the index type\label{section-353}}
|
|
|
|
A wide-ranging change to Python's C API, using a new
|
|
\ctype{Py_ssize_t} type definition instead of \ctype{int},
|
|
will permit the interpreter to handle more data on 64-bit platforms.
|
|
This change doesn't affect Python's capacity on 32-bit platforms.
|
|
|
|
Various pieces of the Python interpreter used C's \ctype{int} type to
|
|
store sizes or counts; for example, the number of items in a list or
|
|
tuple were stored in an \ctype{int}. The C compilers for most 64-bit
|
|
platforms still define \ctype{int} as a 32-bit type, so that meant
|
|
that lists could only hold up to \code{2**31 - 1} = 2147483647 items.
|
|
(There are actually a few different programming models that 64-bit C
|
|
compilers can use -- see
|
|
\url{http://www.unix.org/version2/whatsnew/lp64_wp.html} for a
|
|
discussion -- but the most commonly available model leaves \ctype{int}
|
|
as 32 bits.)
|
|
|
|
A limit of 2147483647 items doesn't really matter on a 32-bit platform
|
|
because you'll run out of memory before hitting the length limit.
|
|
Each list item requires space for a pointer, which is 4 bytes, plus
|
|
space for a \ctype{PyObject} representing the item. 2147483647*4 is
|
|
already more bytes than a 32-bit address space can contain.
|
|
|
|
It's possible to address that much memory on a 64-bit platform,
|
|
however. The pointers for a list that size would only require 16GiB
|
|
of space, so it's not unreasonable that Python programmers might
|
|
construct lists that large. Therefore, the Python interpreter had to
|
|
be changed to use some type other than \ctype{int}, and this will be a
|
|
64-bit type on 64-bit platforms. The change will cause
|
|
incompatibilities on 64-bit machines, so it was deemed worth making
|
|
the transition now, while the number of 64-bit users is still
|
|
relatively small. (In 5 or 10 years, we may \emph{all} be on 64-bit
|
|
machines, and the transition would be more painful then.)
|
|
|
|
This change most strongly affects authors of C extension modules.
|
|
Python strings and container types such as lists and tuples
|
|
now use \ctype{Py_ssize_t} to store their size.
|
|
Functions such as \cfunction{PyList_Size()}
|
|
now return \ctype{Py_ssize_t}. Code in extension modules
|
|
may therefore need to have some variables changed to
|
|
\ctype{Py_ssize_t}.
|
|
|
|
The \cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()} and \cfunction{Py_BuildValue()} functions
|
|
have a new conversion code, \samp{n}, for \ctype{Py_ssize_t}.
|
|
\cfunction{PyArg_ParseTuple()}'s \samp{s\#} and \samp{t\#} still output
|
|
\ctype{int} by default, but you can define the macro
|
|
\csimplemacro{PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN} before including \file{Python.h}
|
|
to make them return \ctype{Py_ssize_t}.
|
|
|
|
\pep{353} has a section on conversion guidelines that
|
|
extension authors should read to learn about supporting 64-bit
|
|
platforms.
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{353}{Using ssize_t as the index type}{PEP written and implemented by Martin von~L\"owis.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{PEP 357: The '__index__' method}
|
|
|
|
The NumPy developers had a problem that could only be solved by adding
|
|
a new special method, \method{__index__}. When using slice notation,
|
|
as in \code{[\var{start}:\var{stop}:\var{step}]}, the values of the
|
|
\var{start}, \var{stop}, and \var{step} indexes must all be either
|
|
integers or long integers. NumPy defines a variety of specialized
|
|
integer types corresponding to unsigned and signed integers of 8, 16,
|
|
32, and 64 bits, but there was no way to signal that these types could
|
|
be used as slice indexes.
|
|
|
|
Slicing can't just use the existing \method{__int__} method because
|
|
that method is also used to implement coercion to integers. If
|
|
slicing used \method{__int__}, floating-point numbers would also
|
|
become legal slice indexes and that's clearly an undesirable
|
|
behaviour.
|
|
|
|
Instead, a new special method called \method{__index__} was added. It
|
|
takes no arguments and returns an integer giving the slice index to
|
|
use. For example:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
class C:
|
|
def __index__ (self):
|
|
return self.value
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The return value must be either a Python integer or long integer.
|
|
The interpreter will check that the type returned is correct, and
|
|
raises a \exception{TypeError} if this requirement isn't met.
|
|
|
|
A corresponding \member{nb_index} slot was added to the C-level
|
|
\ctype{PyNumberMethods} structure to let C extensions implement this
|
|
protocol. \cfunction{PyNumber_Index(\var{obj})} can be used in
|
|
extension code to call the \method{__index__} function and retrieve
|
|
its result.
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{357}{Allowing Any Object to be Used for Slicing}{PEP written
|
|
and implemented by Travis Oliphant.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{Other Language Changes}
|
|
|
|
Here are all of the changes that Python 2.5 makes to the core Python
|
|
language.
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\item The \class{dict} type has a new hook for letting subclasses
|
|
provide a default value when a key isn't contained in the dictionary.
|
|
When a key isn't found, the dictionary's
|
|
\method{__missing__(\var{key})}
|
|
method will be called. This hook is used to implement
|
|
the new \class{defaultdict} class in the \module{collections}
|
|
module. The following example defines a dictionary
|
|
that returns zero for any missing key:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
class zerodict (dict):
|
|
def __missing__ (self, key):
|
|
return 0
|
|
|
|
d = zerodict({1:1, 2:2})
|
|
print d[1], d[2] # Prints 1, 2
|
|
print d[3], d[4] # Prints 0, 0
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
\item The \function{min()} and \function{max()} built-in functions
|
|
gained a \code{key} keyword argument analogous to the \code{key}
|
|
argument for \method{sort()}. This argument supplies a function that
|
|
takes a single argument and is called for every value in the list;
|
|
\function{min()}/\function{max()} will return the element with the
|
|
smallest/largest return value from this function.
|
|
For example, to find the longest string in a list, you can do:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
L = ['medium', 'longest', 'short']
|
|
# Prints 'longest'
|
|
print max(L, key=len)
|
|
# Prints 'short', because lexicographically 'short' has the largest value
|
|
print max(L)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
(Contributed by Steven Bethard and Raymond Hettinger.)
|
|
|
|
\item Two new built-in functions, \function{any()} and
|
|
\function{all()}, evaluate whether an iterator contains any true or
|
|
false values. \function{any()} returns \constant{True} if any value
|
|
returned by the iterator is true; otherwise it will return
|
|
\constant{False}. \function{all()} returns \constant{True} only if
|
|
all of the values returned by the iterator evaluate as being true.
|
|
(Suggested by GvR, and implemented by Raymond Hettinger.)
|
|
|
|
\item ASCII is now the default encoding for modules. It's now
|
|
a syntax error if a module contains string literals with 8-bit
|
|
characters but doesn't have an encoding declaration. In Python 2.4
|
|
this triggered a warning, not a syntax error. See \pep{263}
|
|
for how to declare a module's encoding; for example, you might add
|
|
a line like this near the top of the source file:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
# -*- coding: latin1 -*-
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
\item The list of base classes in a class definition can now be empty.
|
|
As an example, this is now legal:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
class C():
|
|
pass
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
(Implemented by Brett Cannon.)
|
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\subsection{Interactive Interpreter Changes}
|
|
|
|
In the interactive interpreter, \code{quit} and \code{exit}
|
|
have long been strings so that new users get a somewhat helpful message
|
|
when they try to quit:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
>>> quit
|
|
'Use Ctrl-D (i.e. EOF) to exit.'
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
In Python 2.5, \code{quit} and \code{exit} are now objects that still
|
|
produce string representations of themselves, but are also callable.
|
|
Newbies who try \code{quit()} or \code{exit()} will now exit the
|
|
interpreter as they expect. (Implemented by Georg Brandl.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\subsection{Optimizations}
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\item When they were introduced
|
|
in Python 2.4, the built-in \class{set} and \class{frozenset} types
|
|
were built on top of Python's dictionary type.
|
|
In 2.5 the internal data structure has been customized for implementing sets,
|
|
and as a result sets will use a third less memory and are somewhat faster.
|
|
(Implemented by Raymond Hettinger.)
|
|
|
|
\item The performance of some Unicode operations has been improved.
|
|
% XXX provide details?
|
|
|
|
\item The code generator's peephole optimizer now performs
|
|
simple constant folding in expressions. If you write something like
|
|
\code{a = 2+3}, the code generator will do the arithmetic and produce
|
|
code corresponding to \code{a = 5}.
|
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
The net result of the 2.5 optimizations is that Python 2.5 runs the
|
|
pystone benchmark around XXX\% faster than Python 2.4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{New, Improved, and Deprecated Modules}
|
|
|
|
As usual, Python's standard library received many enhancements and
|
|
bug fixes. Here's a partial list of the most notable changes, sorted
|
|
alphabetically by module name. Consult the
|
|
\file{Misc/NEWS} file in the source tree for a more
|
|
complete list of changes, or look through the SVN logs for all the
|
|
details.
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
% the cPickle module no longer accepts the deprecated None option in the
|
|
% args tuple returned by __reduce__().
|
|
|
|
% XXX csv module improvements
|
|
|
|
% XXX datetime.datetime() now has a strptime class method which can be used to
|
|
% create datetime object using a string and format.
|
|
|
|
% XXX fileinput: opening hook used to control how files are opened.
|
|
% .input() now has a mode parameter
|
|
% now has a fileno() function
|
|
% accepts Unicode filenames
|
|
|
|
\item The \module{audioop} module now supports the a-LAW encoding,
|
|
and the code for u-LAW encoding has been improved. (Contributed by
|
|
Lars Immisch.)
|
|
|
|
\item The \module{collections} module gained a new type,
|
|
\class{defaultdict}, that subclasses the standard \class{dict}
|
|
type. The new type mostly behaves like a dictionary but constructs a
|
|
default value when a key isn't present, automatically adding it to the
|
|
dictionary for the requested key value.
|
|
|
|
The first argument to \class{defaultdict}'s constructor is a factory
|
|
function that gets called whenever a key is requested but not found.
|
|
This factory function receives no arguments, so you can use built-in
|
|
type constructors such as \function{list()} or \function{int()}. For
|
|
example,
|
|
you can make an index of words based on their initial letter like this:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
words = """Nel mezzo del cammin di nostra vita
|
|
mi ritrovai per una selva oscura
|
|
che la diritta via era smarrita""".lower().split()
|
|
|
|
index = defaultdict(list)
|
|
|
|
for w in words:
|
|
init_letter = w[0]
|
|
index[init_letter].append(w)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Printing \code{index} results in the following output:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
defaultdict(<type 'list'>, {'c': ['cammin', 'che'], 'e': ['era'],
|
|
'd': ['del', 'di', 'diritta'], 'm': ['mezzo', 'mi'],
|
|
'l': ['la'], 'o': ['oscura'], 'n': ['nel', 'nostra'],
|
|
'p': ['per'], 's': ['selva', 'smarrita'],
|
|
'r': ['ritrovai'], 'u': ['una'], 'v': ['vita', 'via']}
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
The \class{deque} double-ended queue type supplied by the
|
|
\module{collections} module now has a \method{remove(\var{value})}
|
|
method that removes the first occurrence of \var{value} in the queue,
|
|
raising \exception{ValueError} if the value isn't found.
|
|
|
|
\item The \module{cProfile} module is a C implementation of
|
|
the existing \module{profile} module that has much lower overhead.
|
|
The module's interface is the same as \module{profile}: you run
|
|
\code{cProfile.run('main()')} to profile a function, can save profile
|
|
data to a file, etc. It's not yet known if the Hotshot profiler,
|
|
which is also written in C but doesn't match the \module{profile}
|
|
module's interface, will continue to be maintained in future versions
|
|
of Python. (Contributed by Armin Rigo.)
|
|
|
|
\item In the \module{gc} module, the new \function{get_count()} function
|
|
returns a 3-tuple containing the current collection counts for the
|
|
three GC generations. This is accounting information for the garbage
|
|
collector; when these counts reach a specified threshold, a garbage
|
|
collection sweep will be made. The existing \function{gc.collect()}
|
|
function now takes an optional \var{generation} argument of 0, 1, or 2
|
|
to specify which generation to collect.
|
|
|
|
\item The \function{nsmallest()} and
|
|
\function{nlargest()} functions in the \module{heapq} module
|
|
now support a \code{key} keyword argument similar to the one
|
|
provided by the \function{min()}/\function{max()} functions
|
|
and the \method{sort()} methods. For example:
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
>>> import heapq
|
|
>>> L = ["short", 'medium', 'longest', 'longer still']
|
|
>>> heapq.nsmallest(2, L) # Return two lowest elements, lexicographically
|
|
['longer still', 'longest']
|
|
>>> heapq.nsmallest(2, L, key=len) # Return two shortest elements
|
|
['short', 'medium']
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
(Contributed by Raymond Hettinger.)
|
|
|
|
\item The \function{itertools.islice()} function now accepts
|
|
\code{None} for the start and step arguments. This makes it more
|
|
compatible with the attributes of slice objects, so that you can now write
|
|
the following:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
s = slice(5) # Create slice object
|
|
itertools.islice(iterable, s.start, s.stop, s.step)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
(Contributed by Raymond Hettinger.)
|
|
|
|
\item The \module{nis} module now supports accessing domains other
|
|
than the system default domain by supplying a \var{domain} argument to
|
|
the \function{nis.match()} and \function{nis.maps()} functions.
|
|
(Contributed by Ben Bell.)
|
|
|
|
\item The \module{operator} module's \function{itemgetter()}
|
|
and \function{attrgetter()} functions now support multiple fields.
|
|
A call such as \code{operator.attrgetter('a', 'b')}
|
|
will return a function
|
|
that retrieves the \member{a} and \member{b} attributes. Combining
|
|
this new feature with the \method{sort()} method's \code{key} parameter
|
|
lets you easily sort lists using multiple fields.
|
|
(Contributed by Raymond Hettinger.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
\item The \module{os} module underwent several changes. The
|
|
\member{stat_float_times} variable now defaults to true, meaning that
|
|
\function{os.stat()} will now return time values as floats. (This
|
|
doesn't necessarily mean that \function{os.stat()} will return times
|
|
that are precise to fractions of a second; not all systems support
|
|
such precision.)
|
|
|
|
Constants named \member{os.SEEK_SET}, \member{os.SEEK_CUR}, and
|
|
\member{os.SEEK_END} have been added; these are the parameters to the
|
|
\function{os.lseek()} function. Two new constants for locking are
|
|
\member{os.O_SHLOCK} and \member{os.O_EXLOCK}.
|
|
|
|
Two new functions, \function{wait3()} and \function{wait4()}, were
|
|
added. They're similar the \function{waitpid()} function which waits
|
|
for a child process to exit and returns a tuple of the process ID and
|
|
its exit status, but \function{wait3()} and \function{wait4()} return
|
|
additional information. \function{wait3()} doesn't take a process ID
|
|
as input, so it waits for any child process to exit and returns a
|
|
3-tuple of \var{process-id}, \var{exit-status}, \var{resource-usage}
|
|
as returned from the \function{resource.getrusage()} function.
|
|
\function{wait4(\var{pid})} does take a process ID.
|
|
(Contributed by Chad J. Schroeder.)
|
|
|
|
On FreeBSD, the \function{os.stat()} function now returns
|
|
times with nanosecond resolution, and the returned object
|
|
now has \member{st_gen} and \member{st_birthtime}.
|
|
The \member{st_flags} member is also available, if the platform supports it.
|
|
(Contributed by Antti Louko and Diego Petten\`o.)
|
|
% (Patch 1180695, 1212117)
|
|
|
|
\item The old \module{regex} and \module{regsub} modules, which have been
|
|
deprecated ever since Python 2.0, have finally been deleted.
|
|
Other deleted modules: \module{statcache}, \module{tzparse},
|
|
\module{whrandom}.
|
|
|
|
\item The \file{lib-old} directory,
|
|
which includes ancient modules such as \module{dircmp} and
|
|
\module{ni}, was also deleted. \file{lib-old} wasn't on the default
|
|
\code{sys.path}, so unless your programs explicitly added the directory to
|
|
\code{sys.path}, this removal shouldn't affect your code.
|
|
|
|
\item The \module{socket} module now supports \constant{AF_NETLINK}
|
|
sockets on Linux, thanks to a patch from Philippe Biondi.
|
|
Netlink sockets are a Linux-specific mechanism for communications
|
|
between a user-space process and kernel code; an introductory
|
|
article about them is at \url{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7356}.
|
|
In Python code, netlink addresses are represented as a tuple of 2 integers,
|
|
\code{(\var{pid}, \var{group_mask})}.
|
|
|
|
Socket objects also gained accessor methods \method{getfamily()},
|
|
\method{gettype()}, and \method{getproto()} methods to retrieve the
|
|
family, type, and protocol values for the socket.
|
|
|
|
\item New module: \module{spwd} provides functions for accessing the
|
|
shadow password database on systems that support it.
|
|
% XXX give example
|
|
|
|
\item The Python developers switched from CVS to Subversion during the 2.5
|
|
development process. Information about the exact build version is
|
|
available as the \code{sys.subversion} variable, a 3-tuple
|
|
of \code{(\var{interpreter-name}, \var{branch-name}, \var{revision-range})}.
|
|
For example, at the time of writing
|
|
my copy of 2.5 was reporting \code{('CPython', 'trunk', '45313:45315')}.
|
|
|
|
This information is also available to C extensions via the
|
|
\cfunction{Py_GetBuildInfo()} function that returns a
|
|
string of build information like this:
|
|
\code{"trunk:45355:45356M, Apr 13 2006, 07:42:19"}.
|
|
(Contributed by Barry Warsaw.)
|
|
|
|
\item The \class{TarFile} class in the \module{tarfile} module now has
|
|
an \method{extractall()} method that extracts all members from the
|
|
archive into the current working directory. It's also possible to set
|
|
a different directory as the extraction target, and to unpack only a
|
|
subset of the archive's members.
|
|
|
|
A tarfile's compression can be autodetected by
|
|
using the mode \code{'r|*'}.
|
|
% patch 918101
|
|
(Contributed by Lars Gust\"abel.)
|
|
|
|
\item The \module{unicodedata} module has been updated to use version 4.1.0
|
|
of the Unicode character database. Version 3.2.0 is required
|
|
by some specifications, so it's still available as
|
|
\member{unicodedata.db_3_2_0}.
|
|
|
|
% patch #754022: Greatly enhanced webbrowser.py (by Oleg Broytmann).
|
|
|
|
|
|
\item The \module{xmlrpclib} module now supports returning
|
|
\class{datetime} objects for the XML-RPC date type. Supply
|
|
\code{use_datetime=True} to the \function{loads()} function
|
|
or the \class{Unmarshaller} class to enable this feature.
|
|
(Contributed by Skip Montanaro.)
|
|
% Patch 1120353
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
% whole new modules get described in subsections here
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\subsection{The ctypes package}
|
|
|
|
The \module{ctypes} package, written by Thomas Heller, has been added
|
|
to the standard library. \module{ctypes} lets you call arbitrary functions
|
|
in shared libraries or DLLs. Long-time users may remember the \module{dl} module, which
|
|
provides functions for loading shared libraries and calling functions in them. The \module{ctypes} package is much fancier.
|
|
|
|
To load a shared library or DLL, you must create an instance of the
|
|
\class{CDLL} class and provide the name or path of the shared library
|
|
or DLL. Once that's done, you can call arbitrary functions
|
|
by accessing them as attributes of the \class{CDLL} object.
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
import ctypes
|
|
|
|
libc = ctypes.CDLL('libc.so.6')
|
|
result = libc.printf("Line of output\n")
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Type constructors for the various C types are provided: \function{c_int},
|
|
\function{c_float}, \function{c_double}, \function{c_char_p} (equivalent to \ctype{char *}), and so forth. Unlike Python's types, the C versions are all mutable; you can assign to their \member{value} attribute
|
|
to change the wrapped value. Python integers and strings will be automatically
|
|
converted to the corresponding C types, but for other types you
|
|
must call the correct type constructor. (And I mean \emph{must};
|
|
getting it wrong will often result in the interpreter crashing
|
|
with a segmentation fault.)
|
|
|
|
You shouldn't use \function{c_char_p} with a Python string when the C function will be modifying the memory area, because Python strings are
|
|
supposed to be immutable; breaking this rule will cause puzzling bugs. When you need a modifiable memory area,
|
|
use \function{create_string_buffer()}:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
s = "this is a string"
|
|
buf = ctypes.create_string_buffer(s)
|
|
libc.strfry(buf)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
C functions are assumed to return integers, but you can set
|
|
the \member{restype} attribute of the function object to
|
|
change this:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
>>> libc.atof('2.71828')
|
|
-1783957616
|
|
>>> libc.atof.restype = ctypes.c_double
|
|
>>> libc.atof('2.71828')
|
|
2.71828
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
\module{ctypes} also provides a wrapper for Python's C API
|
|
as the \code{ctypes.pythonapi} object. This object does \emph{not}
|
|
release the global interpreter lock before calling a function, because the lock must be held when calling into the interpreter's code.
|
|
There's a \class{py_object()} type constructor that will create a
|
|
\ctype{PyObject *} pointer. A simple usage:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
import ctypes
|
|
|
|
d = {}
|
|
ctypes.pythonapi.PyObject_SetItem(ctypes.py_object(d),
|
|
ctypes.py_object("abc"), ctypes.py_object(1))
|
|
# d is now {'abc', 1}.
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Don't forget to use \class{py_object()}; if it's omitted you end
|
|
up with a segmentation fault.
|
|
|
|
\module{ctypes} has been around for a while, but people still write
|
|
and distribution hand-coded extension modules because you can't rely on \module{ctypes} being present.
|
|
Perhaps developers will begin to write
|
|
Python wrappers atop a library accessed through \module{ctypes} instead
|
|
of extension modules, now that \module{ctypes} is included with core Python.
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seeurl{http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/ctypes/}
|
|
{The ctypes web page, with a tutorial, reference, and FAQ.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\subsection{The ElementTree package}
|
|
|
|
A subset of Fredrik Lundh's ElementTree library for processing XML has
|
|
been added to the standard library as \module{xmlcore.etree}. The
|
|
available modules are
|
|
\module{ElementTree}, \module{ElementPath}, and
|
|
\module{ElementInclude} from ElementTree 1.2.6.
|
|
The \module{cElementTree} accelerator module is also included.
|
|
|
|
The rest of this section will provide a brief overview of using
|
|
ElementTree. Full documentation for ElementTree is available at
|
|
\url{http://effbot.org/zone/element-index.htm}.
|
|
|
|
ElementTree represents an XML document as a tree of element nodes.
|
|
The text content of the document is stored as the \member{.text}
|
|
and \member{.tail} attributes of
|
|
(This is one of the major differences between ElementTree and
|
|
the Document Object Model; in the DOM there are many different
|
|
types of node, including \class{TextNode}.)
|
|
|
|
The most commonly used parsing function is \function{parse()}, that
|
|
takes either a string (assumed to contain a filename) or a file-like
|
|
object and returns an \class{ElementTree} instance:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
from xmlcore.etree import ElementTree as ET
|
|
|
|
tree = ET.parse('ex-1.xml')
|
|
|
|
feed = urllib.urlopen(
|
|
'http://planet.python.org/rss10.xml')
|
|
tree = ET.parse(feed)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Once you have an \class{ElementTree} instance, you
|
|
can call its \method{getroot()} method to get the root \class{Element} node.
|
|
|
|
There's also an \function{XML()} function that takes a string literal
|
|
and returns an \class{Element} node (not an \class{ElementTree}).
|
|
This function provides a tidy way to incorporate XML fragments,
|
|
approaching the convenience of an XML literal:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
svg = et.XML("""<svg width="10px" version="1.0">
|
|
</svg>""")
|
|
svg.set('height', '320px')
|
|
svg.append(elem1)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Each XML element supports some dictionary-like and some list-like
|
|
access methods. Dictionary-like operations are used to access attribute
|
|
values, and list-like operations are used to access child nodes.
|
|
|
|
\begin{tableii}{c|l}{code}{Operation}{Result}
|
|
\lineii{elem[n]}{Returns n'th child element.}
|
|
\lineii{elem[m:n]}{Returns list of m'th through n'th child elements.}
|
|
\lineii{len(elem)}{Returns number of child elements.}
|
|
\lineii{elem.getchildren()}{Returns list of child elements.}
|
|
\lineii{elem.append(elem2)}{Adds \var{elem2} as a child.}
|
|
\lineii{elem.insert(index, elem2)}{Inserts \var{elem2} at the specified location.}
|
|
\lineii{del elem[n]}{Deletes n'th child element.}
|
|
\lineii{elem.keys()}{Returns list of attribute names.}
|
|
\lineii{elem.get(name)}{Returns value of attribute \var{name}.}
|
|
\lineii{elem.set(name, value)}{Sets new value for attribute \var{name}.}
|
|
\lineii{elem.attrib}{Retrieves the dictionary containing attributes.}
|
|
\lineii{del elem.attrib[name]}{Deletes attribute \var{name}.}
|
|
\end{tableii}
|
|
|
|
Comments and processing instructions are also represented as
|
|
\class{Element} nodes. To check if a node is a comment or processing
|
|
instructions:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
if elem.tag is ET.Comment:
|
|
...
|
|
elif elem.tag is ET.ProcessingInstruction:
|
|
...
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
To generate XML output, you should call the
|
|
\method{ElementTree.write()} method. Like \function{parse()},
|
|
it can take either a string or a file-like object:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
# Encoding is US-ASCII
|
|
tree.write('output.xml')
|
|
|
|
# Encoding is UTF-8
|
|
f = open('output.xml', 'w')
|
|
tree.write(f, 'utf-8')
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
(Caution: the default encoding used for output is ASCII, which isn't
|
|
very useful for general XML work, raising an exception if there are
|
|
any characters with values greater than 127. You should always
|
|
specify a different encoding such as UTF-8 that can handle any Unicode
|
|
character.)
|
|
|
|
This section is only a partial description of the ElementTree interfaces.
|
|
Please read the package's official documentation for more details.
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seeurl{http://effbot.org/zone/element-index.htm}
|
|
{Official documentation for ElementTree.}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\subsection{The hashlib package}
|
|
|
|
A new \module{hashlib} module, written by Gregory P. Smith,
|
|
has been added to replace the
|
|
\module{md5} and \module{sha} modules. \module{hashlib} adds support
|
|
for additional secure hashes (SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512).
|
|
When available, the module uses OpenSSL for fast platform optimized
|
|
implementations of algorithms.
|
|
|
|
The old \module{md5} and \module{sha} modules still exist as wrappers
|
|
around hashlib to preserve backwards compatibility. The new module's
|
|
interface is very close to that of the old modules, but not identical.
|
|
The most significant difference is that the constructor functions
|
|
for creating new hashing objects are named differently.
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
# Old versions
|
|
h = md5.md5()
|
|
h = md5.new()
|
|
|
|
# New version
|
|
h = hashlib.md5()
|
|
|
|
# Old versions
|
|
h = sha.sha()
|
|
h = sha.new()
|
|
|
|
# New version
|
|
h = hashlib.sha1()
|
|
|
|
# Hash that weren't previously available
|
|
h = hashlib.sha224()
|
|
h = hashlib.sha256()
|
|
h = hashlib.sha384()
|
|
h = hashlib.sha512()
|
|
|
|
# Alternative form
|
|
h = hashlib.new('md5') # Provide algorithm as a string
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Once a hash object has been created, its methods are the same as before:
|
|
\method{update(\var{string})} hashes the specified string into the
|
|
current digest state, \method{digest()} and \method{hexdigest()}
|
|
return the digest value as a binary string or a string of hex digits,
|
|
and \method{copy()} returns a new hashing object with the same digest state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\subsection{The sqlite3 package}
|
|
|
|
The pysqlite module (\url{http://www.pysqlite.org}), a wrapper for the
|
|
SQLite embedded database, has been added to the standard library under
|
|
the package name \module{sqlite3}.
|
|
|
|
SQLite is a C library that provides a SQL-language database that
|
|
stores data in disk files without requiring a separate server process.
|
|
pysqlite was written by Gerhard H\"aring and provides a SQL interface
|
|
compliant with the DB-API 2.0 specification described by
|
|
\pep{249}. This means that it should be possible to write the first
|
|
version of your applications using SQLite for data storage. If
|
|
switching to a larger database such as PostgreSQL or Oracle is
|
|
later necessary, the switch should be relatively easy.
|
|
|
|
If you're compiling the Python source yourself, note that the source
|
|
tree doesn't include the SQLite code, only the wrapper module.
|
|
You'll need to have the SQLite libraries and headers installed before
|
|
compiling Python, and the build process will compile the module when
|
|
the necessary headers are available.
|
|
|
|
To use the module, you must first create a \class{Connection} object
|
|
that represents the database. Here the data will be stored in the
|
|
\file{/tmp/example} file:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
conn = sqlite3.connect('/tmp/example')
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
You can also supply the special name \samp{:memory:} to create
|
|
a database in RAM.
|
|
|
|
Once you have a \class{Connection}, you can create a \class{Cursor}
|
|
object and call its \method{execute()} method to perform SQL commands:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
c = conn.cursor()
|
|
|
|
# Create table
|
|
c.execute('''create table stocks
|
|
(date timestamp, trans varchar, symbol varchar,
|
|
qty decimal, price decimal)''')
|
|
|
|
# Insert a row of data
|
|
c.execute("""insert into stocks
|
|
values ('2006-01-05','BUY','RHAT',100,35.14)""")
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
Usually your SQL operations will need to use values from Python
|
|
variables. You shouldn't assemble your query using Python's string
|
|
operations because doing so is insecure; it makes your program
|
|
vulnerable to an SQL injection attack.
|
|
|
|
Instead, use SQLite's parameter substitution. Put \samp{?} as a
|
|
placeholder wherever you want to use a value, and then provide a tuple
|
|
of values as the second argument to the cursor's \method{execute()}
|
|
method. For example:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
# Never do this -- insecure!
|
|
symbol = 'IBM'
|
|
c.execute("... where symbol = '%s'" % symbol)
|
|
|
|
# Do this instead
|
|
t = (symbol,)
|
|
c.execute('select * from stocks where symbol=?', ('IBM',))
|
|
|
|
# Larger example
|
|
for t in (('2006-03-28', 'BUY', 'IBM', 1000, 45.00),
|
|
('2006-04-05', 'BUY', 'MSOFT', 1000, 72.00),
|
|
('2006-04-06', 'SELL', 'IBM', 500, 53.00),
|
|
):
|
|
c.execute('insert into stocks values (?,?,?,?,?)', t)
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
To retrieve data after executing a SELECT statement, you can either
|
|
treat the cursor as an iterator, call the cursor's \method{fetchone()}
|
|
method to retrieve a single matching row,
|
|
or call \method{fetchall()} to get a list of the matching rows.
|
|
|
|
This example uses the iterator form:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
>>> c = conn.cursor()
|
|
>>> c.execute('select * from stocks order by price')
|
|
>>> for row in c:
|
|
... print row
|
|
...
|
|
(u'2006-01-05', u'BUY', u'RHAT', 100, 35.140000000000001)
|
|
(u'2006-03-28', u'BUY', u'IBM', 1000, 45.0)
|
|
(u'2006-04-06', u'SELL', u'IBM', 500, 53.0)
|
|
(u'2006-04-05', u'BUY', u'MSOFT', 1000, 72.0)
|
|
>>>
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
For more information about the SQL dialect supported by SQLite, see
|
|
\url{http://www.sqlite.org}.
|
|
|
|
\begin{seealso}
|
|
|
|
\seeurl{http://www.pysqlite.org}
|
|
{The pysqlite web page.}
|
|
|
|
\seeurl{http://www.sqlite.org}
|
|
{The SQLite web page; the documentation describes the syntax and the
|
|
available data types for the supported SQL dialect.}
|
|
|
|
\seepep{249}{Database API Specification 2.0}{PEP written by
|
|
Marc-Andr\'e Lemburg.}
|
|
|
|
\end{seealso}
|
|
|
|
|
|
% ======================================================================
|
|
\section{Build and C API Changes}
|
|
|
|
Changes to Python's build process and to the C API include:
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\item The largest change to the C API came from \pep{353},
|
|
which modifies the interpreter to use a \ctype{Py_ssize_t} type
|
|
definition instead of \ctype{int}. See the earlier
|
|
section~ref{section-353} for a discussion of this change.
|
|
|
|
\item The design of the bytecode compiler has changed a great deal, to
|
|
no longer generate bytecode by traversing the parse tree. Instead
|
|
the parse tree is converted to an abstract syntax tree (or AST), and it is
|
|
the abstract syntax tree that's traversed to produce the bytecode.
|
|
|
|
It's possible for Python code to obtain AST objects by using the
|
|
\function{compile()} built-in and specifying \code{_ast.PyCF_ONLY_AST}
|
|
as the value of the
|
|
\var{flags} parameter:
|
|
|
|
\begin{verbatim}
|
|
from _ast import PyCF_ONLY_AST
|
|
ast = compile("""a=0
|
|
for i in range(10):
|
|
a += i
|
|
""", "<string>", 'exec', PyCF_ONLY_AST)
|
|
|
|
assignment = ast.body[0]
|
|
for_loop = ast.body[1]
|
|
\end{verbatim}
|
|
|
|
No documentation has been written for the AST code yet. To start
|
|
learning about it, read the definition of the various AST nodes in
|
|
\file{Parser/Python.asdl}. A Python script reads this file and
|
|
generates a set of C structure definitions in
|
|
\file{Include/Python-ast.h}. The \cfunction{PyParser_ASTFromString()}
|
|
and \cfunction{PyParser_ASTFromFile()}, defined in
|
|
\file{Include/pythonrun.h}, take Python source as input and return the
|
|
root of an AST representing the contents. This AST can then be turned
|
|
into a code object by \cfunction{PyAST_Compile()}. For more
|
|
information, read the source code, and then ask questions on
|
|
python-dev.
|
|
|
|
% List of names taken from Jeremy's python-dev post at
|
|
% http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-October/057500.html
|
|
The AST code was developed under Jeremy Hylton's management, and
|
|
implemented by (in alphabetical order) Brett Cannon, Nick Coghlan,
|
|
Grant Edwards, John Ehresman, Kurt Kaiser, Neal Norwitz, Tim Peters,
|
|
Armin Rigo, and Neil Schemenauer, plus the participants in a number of
|
|
AST sprints at conferences such as PyCon.
|
|
|
|
\item The built-in set types now have an official C API. Call
|
|
\cfunction{PySet_New()} and \cfunction{PyFrozenSet_New()} to create a
|
|
new set, \cfunction{PySet_Add()} and \cfunction{PySet_Discard()} to
|
|
add and remove elements, and \cfunction{PySet_Contains} and
|
|
\cfunction{PySet_Size} to examine the set's state.
|
|
(Contributed by Raymond Hettinger.)
|
|
|
|
\item C code can now obtain information about the exact revision
|
|
of the Python interpreter by calling the
|
|
\cfunction{Py_GetBuildInfo()} function that returns a
|
|
string of build information like this:
|
|
\code{"trunk:45355:45356M, Apr 13 2006, 07:42:19"}.
|
|
(Contributed by Barry Warsaw.)
|
|
|
|
\item The CPython interpreter is still written in C, but
|
|
the code can now be compiled with a {\Cpp} compiler without errors.
|
|
(Implemented by Anthony Baxter, Martin von~L\"owis, Skip Montanaro.)
|
|
|
|
\item The \cfunction{PyRange_New()} function was removed. It was
|
|
never documented, never used in the core code, and had dangerously lax
|
|
error checking.
|
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\subsection{Port-Specific Changes}
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\item MacOS X (10.3 and higher): dynamic loading of modules
|
|
now uses the \cfunction{dlopen()} function instead of MacOS-specific
|
|
functions.
|
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{Other Changes and Fixes \label{section-other}}
|
|
|
|
As usual, there were a bunch of other improvements and bugfixes
|
|
scattered throughout the source tree. A search through the SVN change
|
|
logs finds there were XXX patches applied and YYY bugs fixed between
|
|
Python 2.4 and 2.5. Both figures are likely to be underestimates.
|
|
|
|
Some of the more notable changes are:
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\item Evan Jones's patch to obmalloc, first described in a talk
|
|
at PyCon DC 2005, was applied. Python 2.4 allocated small objects in
|
|
256K-sized arenas, but never freed arenas. With this patch, Python
|
|
will free arenas when they're empty. The net effect is that on some
|
|
platforms, when you allocate many objects, Python's memory usage may
|
|
actually drop when you delete them, and the memory may be returned to
|
|
the operating system. (Implemented by Evan Jones, and reworked by Tim
|
|
Peters.)
|
|
|
|
Note that this change means extension modules need to be more careful
|
|
with how they allocate memory. Python's API has many different
|
|
functions for allocating memory that are grouped into families. For
|
|
example, \cfunction{PyMem_Malloc()}, \cfunction{PyMem_Realloc()}, and
|
|
\cfunction{PyMem_Free()} are one family that allocates raw memory,
|
|
while \cfunction{PyObject_Malloc()}, \cfunction{PyObject_Realloc()},
|
|
and \cfunction{PyObject_Free()} are another family that's supposed to
|
|
be used for creating Python objects.
|
|
|
|
Previously these different families all reduced to the platform's
|
|
\cfunction{malloc()} and \cfunction{free()} functions. This meant
|
|
it didn't matter if you got things wrong and allocated memory with the
|
|
\cfunction{PyMem} function but freed it with the \cfunction{PyObject}
|
|
function. With the obmalloc change, these families now do different
|
|
things, and mismatches will probably result in a segfault. You should
|
|
carefully test your C extension modules with Python 2.5.
|
|
|
|
\item Coverity, a company that markets a source code analysis tool
|
|
called Prevent, provided the results of their examination of the Python
|
|
source code. The analysis found about 60 bugs that
|
|
were quickly fixed. Many of the bugs were refcounting problems, often
|
|
occurring in error-handling code. See
|
|
\url{http://scan.coverity.com} for the statistics.
|
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{Porting to Python 2.5}
|
|
|
|
This section lists previously described changes that may require
|
|
changes to your code:
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\item ASCII is now the default encoding for modules. It's now
|
|
a syntax error if a module contains string literals with 8-bit
|
|
characters but doesn't have an encoding declaration. In Python 2.4
|
|
this triggered a warning, not a syntax error.
|
|
|
|
\item The \module{pickle} module no longer uses the deprecated \var{bin} parameter.
|
|
|
|
\item Previously, the \member{gi_frame} attribute of a generator
|
|
was always a frame object. Because of the \pep{342} changes
|
|
described in section~\ref{section-generators}, it's now possible
|
|
for \member{gi_frame} to be \code{None}.
|
|
|
|
\item C API: Many functions now use \ctype{Py_ssize_t}
|
|
instead of \ctype{int} to allow processing more data
|
|
on 64-bit machines. Extension code may need to make
|
|
the same change to avoid warnings and to support 64-bit machines.
|
|
See the earlier
|
|
section~ref{section-353} for a discussion of this change.
|
|
|
|
\item C API:
|
|
The obmalloc changes mean that
|
|
you must be careful to not mix usage
|
|
of the \cfunction{PyMem_*()} and \cfunction{PyObject_*()}
|
|
families of functions. Memory allocated with
|
|
one family's \cfunction{*_Malloc()} must be
|
|
freed with the corresponding family's \cfunction{*_Free()} function.
|
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
|
|
%======================================================================
|
|
\section{Acknowledgements \label{acks}}
|
|
|
|
The author would like to thank the following people for offering
|
|
suggestions, corrections and assistance with various drafts of this
|
|
article: Martin von~L\"owis, Mike Rovner, Thomas Wouters.
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|