mirror of https://github.com/python/cpython
1329 lines
56 KiB
ReStructuredText
1329 lines
56 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. highlightlang:: c
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _extending-intro:
|
|
|
|
******************************
|
|
Extending Python with C or C++
|
|
******************************
|
|
|
|
It is quite easy to add new built-in modules to Python, if you know how to
|
|
program in C. Such :dfn:`extension modules` can do two things that can't be
|
|
done directly in Python: they can implement new built-in object types, and they
|
|
can call C library functions and system calls.
|
|
|
|
To support extensions, the Python API (Application Programmers Interface)
|
|
defines a set of functions, macros and variables that provide access to most
|
|
aspects of the Python run-time system. The Python API is incorporated in a C
|
|
source file by including the header ``"Python.h"``.
|
|
|
|
The compilation of an extension module depends on its intended use as well as on
|
|
your system setup; details are given in later chapters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _extending-simpleexample:
|
|
|
|
A Simple Example
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
Let's create an extension module called ``spam`` (the favorite food of Monty
|
|
Python fans...) and let's say we want to create a Python interface to the C
|
|
library function :cfunc:`system`. [#]_ This function takes a null-terminated
|
|
character string as argument and returns an integer. We want this function to
|
|
be callable from Python as follows::
|
|
|
|
>>> import spam
|
|
>>> status = spam.system("ls -l")
|
|
|
|
Begin by creating a file :file:`spammodule.c`. (Historically, if a module is
|
|
called ``spam``, the C file containing its implementation is called
|
|
:file:`spammodule.c`; if the module name is very long, like ``spammify``, the
|
|
module name can be just :file:`spammify.c`.)
|
|
|
|
The first line of our file can be::
|
|
|
|
#include <Python.h>
|
|
|
|
which pulls in the Python API (you can add a comment describing the purpose of
|
|
the module and a copyright notice if you like).
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Since Python may define some pre-processor definitions which affect the standard
|
|
headers on some systems, you *must* include :file:`Python.h` before any standard
|
|
headers are included.
|
|
|
|
All user-visible symbols defined by :file:`Python.h` have a prefix of ``Py`` or
|
|
``PY``, except those defined in standard header files. For convenience, and
|
|
since they are used extensively by the Python interpreter, ``"Python.h"``
|
|
includes a few standard header files: ``<stdio.h>``, ``<string.h>``,
|
|
``<errno.h>``, and ``<stdlib.h>``. If the latter header file does not exist on
|
|
your system, it declares the functions :cfunc:`malloc`, :cfunc:`free` and
|
|
:cfunc:`realloc` directly.
|
|
|
|
The next thing we add to our module file is the C function that will be called
|
|
when the Python expression ``spam.system(string)`` is evaluated (we'll see
|
|
shortly how it ends up being called)::
|
|
|
|
static PyObject *
|
|
spam_system(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
|
|
{
|
|
const char *command;
|
|
int sts;
|
|
|
|
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &command))
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
sts = system(command);
|
|
return PyLong_FromLong(sts);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
There is a straightforward translation from the argument list in Python (for
|
|
example, the single expression ``"ls -l"``) to the arguments passed to the C
|
|
function. The C function always has two arguments, conventionally named *self*
|
|
and *args*.
|
|
|
|
The *self* argument points to the module object for module-level functions;
|
|
for a method it would point to the object instance.
|
|
|
|
The *args* argument will be a pointer to a Python tuple object containing the
|
|
arguments. Each item of the tuple corresponds to an argument in the call's
|
|
argument list. The arguments are Python objects --- in order to do anything
|
|
with them in our C function we have to convert them to C values. The function
|
|
:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` in the Python API checks the argument types and
|
|
converts them to C values. It uses a template string to determine the required
|
|
types of the arguments as well as the types of the C variables into which to
|
|
store the converted values. More about this later.
|
|
|
|
:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` returns true (nonzero) if all arguments have the right
|
|
type and its components have been stored in the variables whose addresses are
|
|
passed. It returns false (zero) if an invalid argument list was passed. In the
|
|
latter case it also raises an appropriate exception so the calling function can
|
|
return *NULL* immediately (as we saw in the example).
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _extending-errors:
|
|
|
|
Intermezzo: Errors and Exceptions
|
|
=================================
|
|
|
|
An important convention throughout the Python interpreter is the following: when
|
|
a function fails, it should set an exception condition and return an error value
|
|
(usually a *NULL* pointer). Exceptions are stored in a static global variable
|
|
inside the interpreter; if this variable is *NULL* no exception has occurred. A
|
|
second global variable stores the "associated value" of the exception (the
|
|
second argument to :keyword:`raise`). A third variable contains the stack
|
|
traceback in case the error originated in Python code. These three variables
|
|
are the C equivalents of the result in Python of :meth:`sys.exc_info` (see the
|
|
section on module :mod:`sys` in the Python Library Reference). It is important
|
|
to know about them to understand how errors are passed around.
|
|
|
|
The Python API defines a number of functions to set various types of exceptions.
|
|
|
|
The most common one is :cfunc:`PyErr_SetString`. Its arguments are an exception
|
|
object and a C string. The exception object is usually a predefined object like
|
|
:cdata:`PyExc_ZeroDivisionError`. The C string indicates the cause of the error
|
|
and is converted to a Python string object and stored as the "associated value"
|
|
of the exception.
|
|
|
|
Another useful function is :cfunc:`PyErr_SetFromErrno`, which only takes an
|
|
exception argument and constructs the associated value by inspection of the
|
|
global variable :cdata:`errno`. The most general function is
|
|
:cfunc:`PyErr_SetObject`, which takes two object arguments, the exception and
|
|
its associated value. You don't need to :cfunc:`Py_INCREF` the objects passed
|
|
to any of these functions.
|
|
|
|
You can test non-destructively whether an exception has been set with
|
|
:cfunc:`PyErr_Occurred`. This returns the current exception object, or *NULL*
|
|
if no exception has occurred. You normally don't need to call
|
|
:cfunc:`PyErr_Occurred` to see whether an error occurred in a function call,
|
|
since you should be able to tell from the return value.
|
|
|
|
When a function *f* that calls another function *g* detects that the latter
|
|
fails, *f* should itself return an error value (usually *NULL* or ``-1``). It
|
|
should *not* call one of the :cfunc:`PyErr_\*` functions --- one has already
|
|
been called by *g*. *f*'s caller is then supposed to also return an error
|
|
indication to *its* caller, again *without* calling :cfunc:`PyErr_\*`, and so on
|
|
--- the most detailed cause of the error was already reported by the function
|
|
that first detected it. Once the error reaches the Python interpreter's main
|
|
loop, this aborts the currently executing Python code and tries to find an
|
|
exception handler specified by the Python programmer.
|
|
|
|
(There are situations where a module can actually give a more detailed error
|
|
message by calling another :cfunc:`PyErr_\*` function, and in such cases it is
|
|
fine to do so. As a general rule, however, this is not necessary, and can cause
|
|
information about the cause of the error to be lost: most operations can fail
|
|
for a variety of reasons.)
|
|
|
|
To ignore an exception set by a function call that failed, the exception
|
|
condition must be cleared explicitly by calling :cfunc:`PyErr_Clear`. The only
|
|
time C code should call :cfunc:`PyErr_Clear` is if it doesn't want to pass the
|
|
error on to the interpreter but wants to handle it completely by itself
|
|
(possibly by trying something else, or pretending nothing went wrong).
|
|
|
|
Every failing :cfunc:`malloc` call must be turned into an exception --- the
|
|
direct caller of :cfunc:`malloc` (or :cfunc:`realloc`) must call
|
|
:cfunc:`PyErr_NoMemory` and return a failure indicator itself. All the
|
|
object-creating functions (for example, :cfunc:`PyLong_FromLong`) already do
|
|
this, so this note is only relevant to those who call :cfunc:`malloc` directly.
|
|
|
|
Also note that, with the important exception of :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` and
|
|
friends, functions that return an integer status usually return a positive value
|
|
or zero for success and ``-1`` for failure, like Unix system calls.
|
|
|
|
Finally, be careful to clean up garbage (by making :cfunc:`Py_XDECREF` or
|
|
:cfunc:`Py_DECREF` calls for objects you have already created) when you return
|
|
an error indicator!
|
|
|
|
The choice of which exception to raise is entirely yours. There are predeclared
|
|
C objects corresponding to all built-in Python exceptions, such as
|
|
:cdata:`PyExc_ZeroDivisionError`, which you can use directly. Of course, you
|
|
should choose exceptions wisely --- don't use :cdata:`PyExc_TypeError` to mean
|
|
that a file couldn't be opened (that should probably be :cdata:`PyExc_IOError`).
|
|
If something's wrong with the argument list, the :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`
|
|
function usually raises :cdata:`PyExc_TypeError`. If you have an argument whose
|
|
value must be in a particular range or must satisfy other conditions,
|
|
:cdata:`PyExc_ValueError` is appropriate.
|
|
|
|
You can also define a new exception that is unique to your module. For this, you
|
|
usually declare a static object variable at the beginning of your file::
|
|
|
|
static PyObject *SpamError;
|
|
|
|
and initialize it in your module's initialization function (:cfunc:`PyInit_spam`)
|
|
with an exception object (leaving out the error checking for now)::
|
|
|
|
PyMODINIT_FUNC
|
|
PyInit_spam(void)
|
|
{
|
|
PyObject *m;
|
|
|
|
m = PyModule_Create(&spammodule);
|
|
if (m == NULL)
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
SpamError = PyErr_NewException("spam.error", NULL, NULL);
|
|
Py_INCREF(SpamError);
|
|
PyModule_AddObject(m, "error", SpamError);
|
|
return m;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Note that the Python name for the exception object is :exc:`spam.error`. The
|
|
:cfunc:`PyErr_NewException` function may create a class with the base class
|
|
being :exc:`Exception` (unless another class is passed in instead of *NULL*),
|
|
described in :ref:`bltin-exceptions`.
|
|
|
|
Note also that the :cdata:`SpamError` variable retains a reference to the newly
|
|
created exception class; this is intentional! Since the exception could be
|
|
removed from the module by external code, an owned reference to the class is
|
|
needed to ensure that it will not be discarded, causing :cdata:`SpamError` to
|
|
become a dangling pointer. Should it become a dangling pointer, C code which
|
|
raises the exception could cause a core dump or other unintended side effects.
|
|
|
|
We discuss the use of ``PyMODINIT_FUNC`` as a function return type later in this
|
|
sample.
|
|
|
|
The :exc:`spam.error` exception can be raised in your extension module using a
|
|
call to :cfunc:`PyErr_SetString` as shown below::
|
|
|
|
static PyObject *
|
|
spam_system(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
|
|
{
|
|
const char *command;
|
|
int sts;
|
|
|
|
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &command))
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
sts = system(command);
|
|
if (sts < 0) {
|
|
PyErr_SetString(SpamError, "System command failed");
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
return PyLong_FromLong(sts);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _backtoexample:
|
|
|
|
Back to the Example
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
Going back to our example function, you should now be able to understand this
|
|
statement::
|
|
|
|
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &command))
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
It returns *NULL* (the error indicator for functions returning object pointers)
|
|
if an error is detected in the argument list, relying on the exception set by
|
|
:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`. Otherwise the string value of the argument has been
|
|
copied to the local variable :cdata:`command`. This is a pointer assignment and
|
|
you are not supposed to modify the string to which it points (so in Standard C,
|
|
the variable :cdata:`command` should properly be declared as ``const char
|
|
*command``).
|
|
|
|
The next statement is a call to the Unix function :cfunc:`system`, passing it
|
|
the string we just got from :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`::
|
|
|
|
sts = system(command);
|
|
|
|
Our :func:`spam.system` function must return the value of :cdata:`sts` as a
|
|
Python object. This is done using the function :cfunc:`PyLong_FromLong`. ::
|
|
|
|
return PyLong_FromLong(sts);
|
|
|
|
In this case, it will return an integer object. (Yes, even integers are objects
|
|
on the heap in Python!)
|
|
|
|
If you have a C function that returns no useful argument (a function returning
|
|
:ctype:`void`), the corresponding Python function must return ``None``. You
|
|
need this idiom to do so (which is implemented by the :cmacro:`Py_RETURN_NONE`
|
|
macro)::
|
|
|
|
Py_INCREF(Py_None);
|
|
return Py_None;
|
|
|
|
:cdata:`Py_None` is the C name for the special Python object ``None``. It is a
|
|
genuine Python object rather than a *NULL* pointer, which means "error" in most
|
|
contexts, as we have seen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _methodtable:
|
|
|
|
The Module's Method Table and Initialization Function
|
|
=====================================================
|
|
|
|
I promised to show how :cfunc:`spam_system` is called from Python programs.
|
|
First, we need to list its name and address in a "method table"::
|
|
|
|
static PyMethodDef SpamMethods[] = {
|
|
...
|
|
{"system", spam_system, METH_VARARGS,
|
|
"Execute a shell command."},
|
|
...
|
|
{NULL, NULL, 0, NULL} /* Sentinel */
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
Note the third entry (``METH_VARARGS``). This is a flag telling the interpreter
|
|
the calling convention to be used for the C function. It should normally always
|
|
be ``METH_VARARGS`` or ``METH_VARARGS | METH_KEYWORDS``; a value of ``0`` means
|
|
that an obsolete variant of :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` is used.
|
|
|
|
When using only ``METH_VARARGS``, the function should expect the Python-level
|
|
parameters to be passed in as a tuple acceptable for parsing via
|
|
:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`; more information on this function is provided below.
|
|
|
|
The :const:`METH_KEYWORDS` bit may be set in the third field if keyword
|
|
arguments should be passed to the function. In this case, the C function should
|
|
accept a third ``PyObject \*`` parameter which will be a dictionary of keywords.
|
|
Use :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords` to parse the arguments to such a
|
|
function.
|
|
|
|
The method table must be referenced in the module definition structure::
|
|
|
|
static struct PyModuleDef spammodule = {
|
|
PyModuleDef_HEAD_INIT,
|
|
"spam", /* name of module */
|
|
spam_doc, /* module documentation, may be NULL */
|
|
-1, /* size of per-interpreter state of the module,
|
|
or -1 if the module keeps state in global variables. */
|
|
SpamMethods
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
This structure, in turn, must be passed to the interpreter in the module's
|
|
initialization function. The initialization function must be named
|
|
:cfunc:`PyInit_name`, where *name* is the name of the module, and should be the
|
|
only non-\ ``static`` item defined in the module file::
|
|
|
|
PyMODINIT_FUNC
|
|
PyInit_spam(void)
|
|
{
|
|
return PyModule_Create(&spammodule);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Note that PyMODINIT_FUNC declares the function as ``PyObject *`` return type,
|
|
declares any special linkage declarations required by the platform, and for C++
|
|
declares the function as ``extern "C"``.
|
|
|
|
When the Python program imports module :mod:`spam` for the first time,
|
|
:cfunc:`PyInit_spam` is called. (See below for comments about embedding Python.)
|
|
It calls :cfunc:`PyModule_Create`, which returns a module object, and
|
|
inserts built-in function objects into the newly created module based upon the
|
|
table (an array of :ctype:`PyMethodDef` structures) found in the module definition.
|
|
:cfunc:`PyModule_Create` returns a pointer to the module object
|
|
that it creates. It may abort with a fatal error for
|
|
certain errors, or return *NULL* if the module could not be initialized
|
|
satisfactorily. The init function must return the module object to its caller,
|
|
so that it then gets inserted into ``sys.modules``.
|
|
|
|
When embedding Python, the :cfunc:`PyInit_spam` function is not called
|
|
automatically unless there's an entry in the :cdata:`PyImport_Inittab` table.
|
|
To add the module to the initialization table, use :cfunc:`PyImport_AppendInittab`,
|
|
optionally followed by an import of the module::
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
main(int argc, char *argv[])
|
|
{
|
|
/* Add a builtin module, before Py_Initialize */
|
|
PyImport_AppendInittab("spam", PyInit_spam);
|
|
|
|
/* Pass argv[0] to the Python interpreter */
|
|
Py_SetProgramName(argv[0]);
|
|
|
|
/* Initialize the Python interpreter. Required. */
|
|
Py_Initialize();
|
|
|
|
/* Optionally import the module; alternatively,
|
|
import can be deferred until the embedded script
|
|
imports it. */
|
|
PyImport_ImportModule("spam");
|
|
|
|
An example may be found in the file :file:`Demo/embed/demo.c` in the Python
|
|
source distribution.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Removing entries from ``sys.modules`` or importing compiled modules into
|
|
multiple interpreters within a process (or following a :cfunc:`fork` without an
|
|
intervening :cfunc:`exec`) can create problems for some extension modules.
|
|
Extension module authors should exercise caution when initializing internal data
|
|
structures.
|
|
|
|
A more substantial example module is included in the Python source distribution
|
|
as :file:`Modules/xxmodule.c`. This file may be used as a template or simply
|
|
read as an example. The :program:`modulator.py` script included in the source
|
|
distribution or Windows install provides a simple graphical user interface for
|
|
declaring the functions and objects which a module should implement, and can
|
|
generate a template which can be filled in. The script lives in the
|
|
:file:`Tools/modulator/` directory; see the :file:`README` file there for more
|
|
information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _compilation:
|
|
|
|
Compilation and Linkage
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
There are two more things to do before you can use your new extension: compiling
|
|
and linking it with the Python system. If you use dynamic loading, the details
|
|
may depend on the style of dynamic loading your system uses; see the chapters
|
|
about building extension modules (chapter :ref:`building`) and additional
|
|
information that pertains only to building on Windows (chapter
|
|
:ref:`building-on-windows`) for more information about this.
|
|
|
|
If you can't use dynamic loading, or if you want to make your module a permanent
|
|
part of the Python interpreter, you will have to change the configuration setup
|
|
and rebuild the interpreter. Luckily, this is very simple on Unix: just place
|
|
your file (:file:`spammodule.c` for example) in the :file:`Modules/` directory
|
|
of an unpacked source distribution, add a line to the file
|
|
:file:`Modules/Setup.local` describing your file::
|
|
|
|
spam spammodule.o
|
|
|
|
and rebuild the interpreter by running :program:`make` in the toplevel
|
|
directory. You can also run :program:`make` in the :file:`Modules/`
|
|
subdirectory, but then you must first rebuild :file:`Makefile` there by running
|
|
':program:`make` Makefile'. (This is necessary each time you change the
|
|
:file:`Setup` file.)
|
|
|
|
If your module requires additional libraries to link with, these can be listed
|
|
on the line in the configuration file as well, for instance::
|
|
|
|
spam spammodule.o -lX11
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _callingpython:
|
|
|
|
Calling Python Functions from C
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
So far we have concentrated on making C functions callable from Python. The
|
|
reverse is also useful: calling Python functions from C. This is especially the
|
|
case for libraries that support so-called "callback" functions. If a C
|
|
interface makes use of callbacks, the equivalent Python often needs to provide a
|
|
callback mechanism to the Python programmer; the implementation will require
|
|
calling the Python callback functions from a C callback. Other uses are also
|
|
imaginable.
|
|
|
|
Fortunately, the Python interpreter is easily called recursively, and there is a
|
|
standard interface to call a Python function. (I won't dwell on how to call the
|
|
Python parser with a particular string as input --- if you're interested, have a
|
|
look at the implementation of the :option:`-c` command line option in
|
|
:file:`Modules/main.c` from the Python source code.)
|
|
|
|
Calling a Python function is easy. First, the Python program must somehow pass
|
|
you the Python function object. You should provide a function (or some other
|
|
interface) to do this. When this function is called, save a pointer to the
|
|
Python function object (be careful to :cfunc:`Py_INCREF` it!) in a global
|
|
variable --- or wherever you see fit. For example, the following function might
|
|
be part of a module definition::
|
|
|
|
static PyObject *my_callback = NULL;
|
|
|
|
static PyObject *
|
|
my_set_callback(PyObject *dummy, PyObject *args)
|
|
{
|
|
PyObject *result = NULL;
|
|
PyObject *temp;
|
|
|
|
if (PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "O:set_callback", &temp)) {
|
|
if (!PyCallable_Check(temp)) {
|
|
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError, "parameter must be callable");
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
Py_XINCREF(temp); /* Add a reference to new callback */
|
|
Py_XDECREF(my_callback); /* Dispose of previous callback */
|
|
my_callback = temp; /* Remember new callback */
|
|
/* Boilerplate to return "None" */
|
|
Py_INCREF(Py_None);
|
|
result = Py_None;
|
|
}
|
|
return result;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
This function must be registered with the interpreter using the
|
|
:const:`METH_VARARGS` flag; this is described in section :ref:`methodtable`. The
|
|
:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` function and its arguments are documented in section
|
|
:ref:`parsetuple`.
|
|
|
|
The macros :cfunc:`Py_XINCREF` and :cfunc:`Py_XDECREF` increment/decrement the
|
|
reference count of an object and are safe in the presence of *NULL* pointers
|
|
(but note that *temp* will not be *NULL* in this context). More info on them
|
|
in section :ref:`refcounts`.
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: PyObject_CallObject()
|
|
|
|
Later, when it is time to call the function, you call the C function
|
|
:cfunc:`PyObject_CallObject`. This function has two arguments, both pointers to
|
|
arbitrary Python objects: the Python function, and the argument list. The
|
|
argument list must always be a tuple object, whose length is the number of
|
|
arguments. To call the Python function with no arguments, pass in NULL, or
|
|
an empty tuple; to call it with one argument, pass a singleton tuple.
|
|
:cfunc:`Py_BuildValue` returns a tuple when its format string consists of zero
|
|
or more format codes between parentheses. For example::
|
|
|
|
int arg;
|
|
PyObject *arglist;
|
|
PyObject *result;
|
|
...
|
|
arg = 123;
|
|
...
|
|
/* Time to call the callback */
|
|
arglist = Py_BuildValue("(i)", arg);
|
|
result = PyObject_CallObject(my_callback, arglist);
|
|
Py_DECREF(arglist);
|
|
|
|
:cfunc:`PyObject_CallObject` returns a Python object pointer: this is the return
|
|
value of the Python function. :cfunc:`PyObject_CallObject` is
|
|
"reference-count-neutral" with respect to its arguments. In the example a new
|
|
tuple was created to serve as the argument list, which is :cfunc:`Py_DECREF`\
|
|
-ed immediately after the call.
|
|
|
|
The return value of :cfunc:`PyObject_CallObject` is "new": either it is a brand
|
|
new object, or it is an existing object whose reference count has been
|
|
incremented. So, unless you want to save it in a global variable, you should
|
|
somehow :cfunc:`Py_DECREF` the result, even (especially!) if you are not
|
|
interested in its value.
|
|
|
|
Before you do this, however, it is important to check that the return value
|
|
isn't *NULL*. If it is, the Python function terminated by raising an exception.
|
|
If the C code that called :cfunc:`PyObject_CallObject` is called from Python, it
|
|
should now return an error indication to its Python caller, so the interpreter
|
|
can print a stack trace, or the calling Python code can handle the exception.
|
|
If this is not possible or desirable, the exception should be cleared by calling
|
|
:cfunc:`PyErr_Clear`. For example::
|
|
|
|
if (result == NULL)
|
|
return NULL; /* Pass error back */
|
|
...use result...
|
|
Py_DECREF(result);
|
|
|
|
Depending on the desired interface to the Python callback function, you may also
|
|
have to provide an argument list to :cfunc:`PyObject_CallObject`. In some cases
|
|
the argument list is also provided by the Python program, through the same
|
|
interface that specified the callback function. It can then be saved and used
|
|
in the same manner as the function object. In other cases, you may have to
|
|
construct a new tuple to pass as the argument list. The simplest way to do this
|
|
is to call :cfunc:`Py_BuildValue`. For example, if you want to pass an integral
|
|
event code, you might use the following code::
|
|
|
|
PyObject *arglist;
|
|
...
|
|
arglist = Py_BuildValue("(l)", eventcode);
|
|
result = PyObject_CallObject(my_callback, arglist);
|
|
Py_DECREF(arglist);
|
|
if (result == NULL)
|
|
return NULL; /* Pass error back */
|
|
/* Here maybe use the result */
|
|
Py_DECREF(result);
|
|
|
|
Note the placement of ``Py_DECREF(arglist)`` immediately after the call, before
|
|
the error check! Also note that strictly speaking this code is not complete:
|
|
:cfunc:`Py_BuildValue` may run out of memory, and this should be checked.
|
|
|
|
You may also call a function with keyword arguments by using
|
|
:cfunc:`PyObject_Call`, which supports arguments and keyword arguments. As in
|
|
the above example, we use :cfunc:`Py_BuildValue` to construct the dictionary. ::
|
|
|
|
PyObject *dict;
|
|
...
|
|
dict = Py_BuildValue("{s:i}", "name", val);
|
|
result = PyObject_Call(my_callback, NULL, dict);
|
|
Py_DECREF(dict);
|
|
if (result == NULL)
|
|
return NULL; /* Pass error back */
|
|
/* Here maybe use the result */
|
|
Py_DECREF(result);
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _parsetuple:
|
|
|
|
Extracting Parameters in Extension Functions
|
|
============================================
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: PyArg_ParseTuple()
|
|
|
|
The :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` function is declared as follows::
|
|
|
|
int PyArg_ParseTuple(PyObject *arg, char *format, ...);
|
|
|
|
The *arg* argument must be a tuple object containing an argument list passed
|
|
from Python to a C function. The *format* argument must be a format string,
|
|
whose syntax is explained in :ref:`arg-parsing` in the Python/C API Reference
|
|
Manual. The remaining arguments must be addresses of variables whose type is
|
|
determined by the format string.
|
|
|
|
Note that while :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` checks that the Python arguments have
|
|
the required types, it cannot check the validity of the addresses of C variables
|
|
passed to the call: if you make mistakes there, your code will probably crash or
|
|
at least overwrite random bits in memory. So be careful!
|
|
|
|
Note that any Python object references which are provided to the caller are
|
|
*borrowed* references; do not decrement their reference count!
|
|
|
|
Some example calls::
|
|
|
|
#define PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN /* Make "s#" use Py_ssize_t rather than int. */
|
|
#include <Python.h>
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
int ok;
|
|
int i, j;
|
|
long k, l;
|
|
const char *s;
|
|
Py_ssize_t size;
|
|
|
|
ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, ""); /* No arguments */
|
|
/* Python call: f() */
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &s); /* A string */
|
|
/* Possible Python call: f('whoops!') */
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "lls", &k, &l, &s); /* Two longs and a string */
|
|
/* Possible Python call: f(1, 2, 'three') */
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "(ii)s#", &i, &j, &s, &size);
|
|
/* A pair of ints and a string, whose size is also returned */
|
|
/* Possible Python call: f((1, 2), 'three') */
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
const char *file;
|
|
const char *mode = "r";
|
|
int bufsize = 0;
|
|
ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s|si", &file, &mode, &bufsize);
|
|
/* A string, and optionally another string and an integer */
|
|
/* Possible Python calls:
|
|
f('spam')
|
|
f('spam', 'w')
|
|
f('spam', 'wb', 100000) */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
int left, top, right, bottom, h, v;
|
|
ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "((ii)(ii))(ii)",
|
|
&left, &top, &right, &bottom, &h, &v);
|
|
/* A rectangle and a point */
|
|
/* Possible Python call:
|
|
f(((0, 0), (400, 300)), (10, 10)) */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
Py_complex c;
|
|
ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "D:myfunction", &c);
|
|
/* a complex, also providing a function name for errors */
|
|
/* Possible Python call: myfunction(1+2j) */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _parsetupleandkeywords:
|
|
|
|
Keyword Parameters for Extension Functions
|
|
==========================================
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords()
|
|
|
|
The :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords` function is declared as follows::
|
|
|
|
int PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(PyObject *arg, PyObject *kwdict,
|
|
char *format, char *kwlist[], ...);
|
|
|
|
The *arg* and *format* parameters are identical to those of the
|
|
:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` function. The *kwdict* parameter is the dictionary of
|
|
keywords received as the third parameter from the Python runtime. The *kwlist*
|
|
parameter is a *NULL*-terminated list of strings which identify the parameters;
|
|
the names are matched with the type information from *format* from left to
|
|
right. On success, :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords` returns true, otherwise
|
|
it returns false and raises an appropriate exception.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Nested tuples cannot be parsed when using keyword arguments! Keyword parameters
|
|
passed in which are not present in the *kwlist* will cause :exc:`TypeError` to
|
|
be raised.
|
|
|
|
.. index:: single: Philbrick, Geoff
|
|
|
|
Here is an example module which uses keywords, based on an example by Geoff
|
|
Philbrick (philbrick@hks.com)::
|
|
|
|
#include "Python.h"
|
|
|
|
static PyObject *
|
|
keywdarg_parrot(PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *keywds)
|
|
{
|
|
int voltage;
|
|
char *state = "a stiff";
|
|
char *action = "voom";
|
|
char *type = "Norwegian Blue";
|
|
|
|
static char *kwlist[] = {"voltage", "state", "action", "type", NULL};
|
|
|
|
if (!PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, keywds, "i|sss", kwlist,
|
|
&voltage, &state, &action, &type))
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
printf("-- This parrot wouldn't %s if you put %i Volts through it.\n",
|
|
action, voltage);
|
|
printf("-- Lovely plumage, the %s -- It's %s!\n", type, state);
|
|
|
|
Py_INCREF(Py_None);
|
|
|
|
return Py_None;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static PyMethodDef keywdarg_methods[] = {
|
|
/* The cast of the function is necessary since PyCFunction values
|
|
* only take two PyObject* parameters, and keywdarg_parrot() takes
|
|
* three.
|
|
*/
|
|
{"parrot", (PyCFunction)keywdarg_parrot, METH_VARARGS | METH_KEYWORDS,
|
|
"Print a lovely skit to standard output."},
|
|
{NULL, NULL, 0, NULL} /* sentinel */
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
initkeywdarg(void)
|
|
{
|
|
/* Create the module and add the functions */
|
|
Py_InitModule("keywdarg", keywdarg_methods);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _buildvalue:
|
|
|
|
Building Arbitrary Values
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
This function is the counterpart to :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`. It is declared
|
|
as follows::
|
|
|
|
PyObject *Py_BuildValue(char *format, ...);
|
|
|
|
It recognizes a set of format units similar to the ones recognized by
|
|
:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`, but the arguments (which are input to the function,
|
|
not output) must not be pointers, just values. It returns a new Python object,
|
|
suitable for returning from a C function called from Python.
|
|
|
|
One difference with :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`: while the latter requires its
|
|
first argument to be a tuple (since Python argument lists are always represented
|
|
as tuples internally), :cfunc:`Py_BuildValue` does not always build a tuple. It
|
|
builds a tuple only if its format string contains two or more format units. If
|
|
the format string is empty, it returns ``None``; if it contains exactly one
|
|
format unit, it returns whatever object is described by that format unit. To
|
|
force it to return a tuple of size 0 or one, parenthesize the format string.
|
|
|
|
Examples (to the left the call, to the right the resulting Python value)::
|
|
|
|
Py_BuildValue("") None
|
|
Py_BuildValue("i", 123) 123
|
|
Py_BuildValue("iii", 123, 456, 789) (123, 456, 789)
|
|
Py_BuildValue("s", "hello") 'hello'
|
|
Py_BuildValue("y", "hello") b'hello'
|
|
Py_BuildValue("ss", "hello", "world") ('hello', 'world')
|
|
Py_BuildValue("s#", "hello", 4) 'hell'
|
|
Py_BuildValue("y#", "hello", 4) b'hell'
|
|
Py_BuildValue("()") ()
|
|
Py_BuildValue("(i)", 123) (123,)
|
|
Py_BuildValue("(ii)", 123, 456) (123, 456)
|
|
Py_BuildValue("(i,i)", 123, 456) (123, 456)
|
|
Py_BuildValue("[i,i]", 123, 456) [123, 456]
|
|
Py_BuildValue("{s:i,s:i}",
|
|
"abc", 123, "def", 456) {'abc': 123, 'def': 456}
|
|
Py_BuildValue("((ii)(ii)) (ii)",
|
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) (((1, 2), (3, 4)), (5, 6))
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _refcounts:
|
|
|
|
Reference Counts
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
In languages like C or C++, the programmer is responsible for dynamic allocation
|
|
and deallocation of memory on the heap. In C, this is done using the functions
|
|
:cfunc:`malloc` and :cfunc:`free`. In C++, the operators ``new`` and
|
|
``delete`` are used with essentially the same meaning and we'll restrict
|
|
the following discussion to the C case.
|
|
|
|
Every block of memory allocated with :cfunc:`malloc` should eventually be
|
|
returned to the pool of available memory by exactly one call to :cfunc:`free`.
|
|
It is important to call :cfunc:`free` at the right time. If a block's address
|
|
is forgotten but :cfunc:`free` is not called for it, the memory it occupies
|
|
cannot be reused until the program terminates. This is called a :dfn:`memory
|
|
leak`. On the other hand, if a program calls :cfunc:`free` for a block and then
|
|
continues to use the block, it creates a conflict with re-use of the block
|
|
through another :cfunc:`malloc` call. This is called :dfn:`using freed memory`.
|
|
It has the same bad consequences as referencing uninitialized data --- core
|
|
dumps, wrong results, mysterious crashes.
|
|
|
|
Common causes of memory leaks are unusual paths through the code. For instance,
|
|
a function may allocate a block of memory, do some calculation, and then free
|
|
the block again. Now a change in the requirements for the function may add a
|
|
test to the calculation that detects an error condition and can return
|
|
prematurely from the function. It's easy to forget to free the allocated memory
|
|
block when taking this premature exit, especially when it is added later to the
|
|
code. Such leaks, once introduced, often go undetected for a long time: the
|
|
error exit is taken only in a small fraction of all calls, and most modern
|
|
machines have plenty of virtual memory, so the leak only becomes apparent in a
|
|
long-running process that uses the leaking function frequently. Therefore, it's
|
|
important to prevent leaks from happening by having a coding convention or
|
|
strategy that minimizes this kind of errors.
|
|
|
|
Since Python makes heavy use of :cfunc:`malloc` and :cfunc:`free`, it needs a
|
|
strategy to avoid memory leaks as well as the use of freed memory. The chosen
|
|
method is called :dfn:`reference counting`. The principle is simple: every
|
|
object contains a counter, which is incremented when a reference to the object
|
|
is stored somewhere, and which is decremented when a reference to it is deleted.
|
|
When the counter reaches zero, the last reference to the object has been deleted
|
|
and the object is freed.
|
|
|
|
An alternative strategy is called :dfn:`automatic garbage collection`.
|
|
(Sometimes, reference counting is also referred to as a garbage collection
|
|
strategy, hence my use of "automatic" to distinguish the two.) The big
|
|
advantage of automatic garbage collection is that the user doesn't need to call
|
|
:cfunc:`free` explicitly. (Another claimed advantage is an improvement in speed
|
|
or memory usage --- this is no hard fact however.) The disadvantage is that for
|
|
C, there is no truly portable automatic garbage collector, while reference
|
|
counting can be implemented portably (as long as the functions :cfunc:`malloc`
|
|
and :cfunc:`free` are available --- which the C Standard guarantees). Maybe some
|
|
day a sufficiently portable automatic garbage collector will be available for C.
|
|
Until then, we'll have to live with reference counts.
|
|
|
|
While Python uses the traditional reference counting implementation, it also
|
|
offers a cycle detector that works to detect reference cycles. This allows
|
|
applications to not worry about creating direct or indirect circular references;
|
|
these are the weakness of garbage collection implemented using only reference
|
|
counting. Reference cycles consist of objects which contain (possibly indirect)
|
|
references to themselves, so that each object in the cycle has a reference count
|
|
which is non-zero. Typical reference counting implementations are not able to
|
|
reclaim the memory belonging to any objects in a reference cycle, or referenced
|
|
from the objects in the cycle, even though there are no further references to
|
|
the cycle itself.
|
|
|
|
The cycle detector is able to detect garbage cycles and can reclaim them so long
|
|
as there are no finalizers implemented in Python (:meth:`__del__` methods).
|
|
When there are such finalizers, the detector exposes the cycles through the
|
|
:mod:`gc` module (specifically, the
|
|
``garbage`` variable in that module). The :mod:`gc` module also exposes a way
|
|
to run the detector (the :func:`collect` function), as well as configuration
|
|
interfaces and the ability to disable the detector at runtime. The cycle
|
|
detector is considered an optional component; though it is included by default,
|
|
it can be disabled at build time using the :option:`--without-cycle-gc` option
|
|
to the :program:`configure` script on Unix platforms (including Mac OS X). If
|
|
the cycle detector is disabled in this way, the :mod:`gc` module will not be
|
|
available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _refcountsinpython:
|
|
|
|
Reference Counting in Python
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
There are two macros, ``Py_INCREF(x)`` and ``Py_DECREF(x)``, which handle the
|
|
incrementing and decrementing of the reference count. :cfunc:`Py_DECREF` also
|
|
frees the object when the count reaches zero. For flexibility, it doesn't call
|
|
:cfunc:`free` directly --- rather, it makes a call through a function pointer in
|
|
the object's :dfn:`type object`. For this purpose (and others), every object
|
|
also contains a pointer to its type object.
|
|
|
|
The big question now remains: when to use ``Py_INCREF(x)`` and ``Py_DECREF(x)``?
|
|
Let's first introduce some terms. Nobody "owns" an object; however, you can
|
|
:dfn:`own a reference` to an object. An object's reference count is now defined
|
|
as the number of owned references to it. The owner of a reference is
|
|
responsible for calling :cfunc:`Py_DECREF` when the reference is no longer
|
|
needed. Ownership of a reference can be transferred. There are three ways to
|
|
dispose of an owned reference: pass it on, store it, or call :cfunc:`Py_DECREF`.
|
|
Forgetting to dispose of an owned reference creates a memory leak.
|
|
|
|
It is also possible to :dfn:`borrow` [#]_ a reference to an object. The
|
|
borrower of a reference should not call :cfunc:`Py_DECREF`. The borrower must
|
|
not hold on to the object longer than the owner from which it was borrowed.
|
|
Using a borrowed reference after the owner has disposed of it risks using freed
|
|
memory and should be avoided completely. [#]_
|
|
|
|
The advantage of borrowing over owning a reference is that you don't need to
|
|
take care of disposing of the reference on all possible paths through the code
|
|
--- in other words, with a borrowed reference you don't run the risk of leaking
|
|
when a premature exit is taken. The disadvantage of borrowing over owning is
|
|
that there are some subtle situations where in seemingly correct code a borrowed
|
|
reference can be used after the owner from which it was borrowed has in fact
|
|
disposed of it.
|
|
|
|
A borrowed reference can be changed into an owned reference by calling
|
|
:cfunc:`Py_INCREF`. This does not affect the status of the owner from which the
|
|
reference was borrowed --- it creates a new owned reference, and gives full
|
|
owner responsibilities (the new owner must dispose of the reference properly, as
|
|
well as the previous owner).
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _ownershiprules:
|
|
|
|
Ownership Rules
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
Whenever an object reference is passed into or out of a function, it is part of
|
|
the function's interface specification whether ownership is transferred with the
|
|
reference or not.
|
|
|
|
Most functions that return a reference to an object pass on ownership with the
|
|
reference. In particular, all functions whose function it is to create a new
|
|
object, such as :cfunc:`PyLong_FromLong` and :cfunc:`Py_BuildValue`, pass
|
|
ownership to the receiver. Even if the object is not actually new, you still
|
|
receive ownership of a new reference to that object. For instance,
|
|
:cfunc:`PyLong_FromLong` maintains a cache of popular values and can return a
|
|
reference to a cached item.
|
|
|
|
Many functions that extract objects from other objects also transfer ownership
|
|
with the reference, for instance :cfunc:`PyObject_GetAttrString`. The picture
|
|
is less clear, here, however, since a few common routines are exceptions:
|
|
:cfunc:`PyTuple_GetItem`, :cfunc:`PyList_GetItem`, :cfunc:`PyDict_GetItem`, and
|
|
:cfunc:`PyDict_GetItemString` all return references that you borrow from the
|
|
tuple, list or dictionary.
|
|
|
|
The function :cfunc:`PyImport_AddModule` also returns a borrowed reference, even
|
|
though it may actually create the object it returns: this is possible because an
|
|
owned reference to the object is stored in ``sys.modules``.
|
|
|
|
When you pass an object reference into another function, in general, the
|
|
function borrows the reference from you --- if it needs to store it, it will use
|
|
:cfunc:`Py_INCREF` to become an independent owner. There are exactly two
|
|
important exceptions to this rule: :cfunc:`PyTuple_SetItem` and
|
|
:cfunc:`PyList_SetItem`. These functions take over ownership of the item passed
|
|
to them --- even if they fail! (Note that :cfunc:`PyDict_SetItem` and friends
|
|
don't take over ownership --- they are "normal.")
|
|
|
|
When a C function is called from Python, it borrows references to its arguments
|
|
from the caller. The caller owns a reference to the object, so the borrowed
|
|
reference's lifetime is guaranteed until the function returns. Only when such a
|
|
borrowed reference must be stored or passed on, it must be turned into an owned
|
|
reference by calling :cfunc:`Py_INCREF`.
|
|
|
|
The object reference returned from a C function that is called from Python must
|
|
be an owned reference --- ownership is transferred from the function to its
|
|
caller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _thinice:
|
|
|
|
Thin Ice
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
There are a few situations where seemingly harmless use of a borrowed reference
|
|
can lead to problems. These all have to do with implicit invocations of the
|
|
interpreter, which can cause the owner of a reference to dispose of it.
|
|
|
|
The first and most important case to know about is using :cfunc:`Py_DECREF` on
|
|
an unrelated object while borrowing a reference to a list item. For instance::
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
bug(PyObject *list)
|
|
{
|
|
PyObject *item = PyList_GetItem(list, 0);
|
|
|
|
PyList_SetItem(list, 1, PyLong_FromLong(0L));
|
|
PyObject_Print(item, stdout, 0); /* BUG! */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
This function first borrows a reference to ``list[0]``, then replaces
|
|
``list[1]`` with the value ``0``, and finally prints the borrowed reference.
|
|
Looks harmless, right? But it's not!
|
|
|
|
Let's follow the control flow into :cfunc:`PyList_SetItem`. The list owns
|
|
references to all its items, so when item 1 is replaced, it has to dispose of
|
|
the original item 1. Now let's suppose the original item 1 was an instance of a
|
|
user-defined class, and let's further suppose that the class defined a
|
|
:meth:`__del__` method. If this class instance has a reference count of 1,
|
|
disposing of it will call its :meth:`__del__` method.
|
|
|
|
Since it is written in Python, the :meth:`__del__` method can execute arbitrary
|
|
Python code. Could it perhaps do something to invalidate the reference to
|
|
``item`` in :cfunc:`bug`? You bet! Assuming that the list passed into
|
|
:cfunc:`bug` is accessible to the :meth:`__del__` method, it could execute a
|
|
statement to the effect of ``del list[0]``, and assuming this was the last
|
|
reference to that object, it would free the memory associated with it, thereby
|
|
invalidating ``item``.
|
|
|
|
The solution, once you know the source of the problem, is easy: temporarily
|
|
increment the reference count. The correct version of the function reads::
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
no_bug(PyObject *list)
|
|
{
|
|
PyObject *item = PyList_GetItem(list, 0);
|
|
|
|
Py_INCREF(item);
|
|
PyList_SetItem(list, 1, PyLong_FromLong(0L));
|
|
PyObject_Print(item, stdout, 0);
|
|
Py_DECREF(item);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
This is a true story. An older version of Python contained variants of this bug
|
|
and someone spent a considerable amount of time in a C debugger to figure out
|
|
why his :meth:`__del__` methods would fail...
|
|
|
|
The second case of problems with a borrowed reference is a variant involving
|
|
threads. Normally, multiple threads in the Python interpreter can't get in each
|
|
other's way, because there is a global lock protecting Python's entire object
|
|
space. However, it is possible to temporarily release this lock using the macro
|
|
:cmacro:`Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS`, and to re-acquire it using
|
|
:cmacro:`Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS`. This is common around blocking I/O calls, to
|
|
let other threads use the processor while waiting for the I/O to complete.
|
|
Obviously, the following function has the same problem as the previous one::
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
bug(PyObject *list)
|
|
{
|
|
PyObject *item = PyList_GetItem(list, 0);
|
|
Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS
|
|
...some blocking I/O call...
|
|
Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS
|
|
PyObject_Print(item, stdout, 0); /* BUG! */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _nullpointers:
|
|
|
|
NULL Pointers
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
In general, functions that take object references as arguments do not expect you
|
|
to pass them *NULL* pointers, and will dump core (or cause later core dumps) if
|
|
you do so. Functions that return object references generally return *NULL* only
|
|
to indicate that an exception occurred. The reason for not testing for *NULL*
|
|
arguments is that functions often pass the objects they receive on to other
|
|
function --- if each function were to test for *NULL*, there would be a lot of
|
|
redundant tests and the code would run more slowly.
|
|
|
|
It is better to test for *NULL* only at the "source:" when a pointer that may be
|
|
*NULL* is received, for example, from :cfunc:`malloc` or from a function that
|
|
may raise an exception.
|
|
|
|
The macros :cfunc:`Py_INCREF` and :cfunc:`Py_DECREF` do not check for *NULL*
|
|
pointers --- however, their variants :cfunc:`Py_XINCREF` and :cfunc:`Py_XDECREF`
|
|
do.
|
|
|
|
The macros for checking for a particular object type (``Pytype_Check()``) don't
|
|
check for *NULL* pointers --- again, there is much code that calls several of
|
|
these in a row to test an object against various different expected types, and
|
|
this would generate redundant tests. There are no variants with *NULL*
|
|
checking.
|
|
|
|
The C function calling mechanism guarantees that the argument list passed to C
|
|
functions (``args`` in the examples) is never *NULL* --- in fact it guarantees
|
|
that it is always a tuple. [#]_
|
|
|
|
It is a severe error to ever let a *NULL* pointer "escape" to the Python user.
|
|
|
|
.. Frank Stajano:
|
|
A pedagogically buggy example, along the lines of the previous listing, would
|
|
be helpful here -- showing in more concrete terms what sort of actions could
|
|
cause the problem. I can't very well imagine it from the description.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _cplusplus:
|
|
|
|
Writing Extensions in C++
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
It is possible to write extension modules in C++. Some restrictions apply. If
|
|
the main program (the Python interpreter) is compiled and linked by the C
|
|
compiler, global or static objects with constructors cannot be used. This is
|
|
not a problem if the main program is linked by the C++ compiler. Functions that
|
|
will be called by the Python interpreter (in particular, module initialization
|
|
functions) have to be declared using ``extern "C"``. It is unnecessary to
|
|
enclose the Python header files in ``extern "C" {...}`` --- they use this form
|
|
already if the symbol ``__cplusplus`` is defined (all recent C++ compilers
|
|
define this symbol).
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _using-capsules:
|
|
|
|
Providing a C API for an Extension Module
|
|
=========================================
|
|
|
|
.. sectionauthor:: Konrad Hinsen <hinsen@cnrs-orleans.fr>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many extension modules just provide new functions and types to be used from
|
|
Python, but sometimes the code in an extension module can be useful for other
|
|
extension modules. For example, an extension module could implement a type
|
|
"collection" which works like lists without order. Just like the standard Python
|
|
list type has a C API which permits extension modules to create and manipulate
|
|
lists, this new collection type should have a set of C functions for direct
|
|
manipulation from other extension modules.
|
|
|
|
At first sight this seems easy: just write the functions (without declaring them
|
|
``static``, of course), provide an appropriate header file, and document
|
|
the C API. And in fact this would work if all extension modules were always
|
|
linked statically with the Python interpreter. When modules are used as shared
|
|
libraries, however, the symbols defined in one module may not be visible to
|
|
another module. The details of visibility depend on the operating system; some
|
|
systems use one global namespace for the Python interpreter and all extension
|
|
modules (Windows, for example), whereas others require an explicit list of
|
|
imported symbols at module link time (AIX is one example), or offer a choice of
|
|
different strategies (most Unices). And even if symbols are globally visible,
|
|
the module whose functions one wishes to call might not have been loaded yet!
|
|
|
|
Portability therefore requires not to make any assumptions about symbol
|
|
visibility. This means that all symbols in extension modules should be declared
|
|
``static``, except for the module's initialization function, in order to
|
|
avoid name clashes with other extension modules (as discussed in section
|
|
:ref:`methodtable`). And it means that symbols that *should* be accessible from
|
|
other extension modules must be exported in a different way.
|
|
|
|
Python provides a special mechanism to pass C-level information (pointers) from
|
|
one extension module to another one: Capsules. A Capsule is a Python data type
|
|
which stores a pointer (:ctype:`void \*`). Capsules can only be created and
|
|
accessed via their C API, but they can be passed around like any other Python
|
|
object. In particular, they can be assigned to a name in an extension module's
|
|
namespace. Other extension modules can then import this module, retrieve the
|
|
value of this name, and then retrieve the pointer from the Capsule.
|
|
|
|
There are many ways in which Capsules can be used to export the C API of an
|
|
extension module. Each function could get its own Capsule, or all C API pointers
|
|
could be stored in an array whose address is published in a Capsule. And the
|
|
various tasks of storing and retrieving the pointers can be distributed in
|
|
different ways between the module providing the code and the client modules.
|
|
|
|
Whichever method you choose, it's important to name your Capsules properly.
|
|
The function :cfunc:`PyCapsule_New` takes a name parameter
|
|
(:ctype:`const char \*`); you're permitted to pass in a *NULL* name, but
|
|
we strongly encourage you to specify a name. Properly named Capsules provide
|
|
a degree of runtime type-safety; there is no feasible way to tell one unnamed
|
|
Capsule from another.
|
|
|
|
In particular, Capsules used to expose C APIs should be given a name following
|
|
this convention::
|
|
|
|
modulename.attributename
|
|
|
|
The convenience function :cfunc:`PyCapsule_Import` makes it easy to
|
|
load a C API provided via a Capsule, but only if the Capsule's name
|
|
matches this convention. This behavior gives C API users a high degree
|
|
of certainty that the Capsule they load contains the correct C API.
|
|
|
|
The following example demonstrates an approach that puts most of the burden on
|
|
the writer of the exporting module, which is appropriate for commonly used
|
|
library modules. It stores all C API pointers (just one in the example!) in an
|
|
array of :ctype:`void` pointers which becomes the value of a Capsule. The header
|
|
file corresponding to the module provides a macro that takes care of importing
|
|
the module and retrieving its C API pointers; client modules only have to call
|
|
this macro before accessing the C API.
|
|
|
|
The exporting module is a modification of the :mod:`spam` module from section
|
|
:ref:`extending-simpleexample`. The function :func:`spam.system` does not call
|
|
the C library function :cfunc:`system` directly, but a function
|
|
:cfunc:`PySpam_System`, which would of course do something more complicated in
|
|
reality (such as adding "spam" to every command). This function
|
|
:cfunc:`PySpam_System` is also exported to other extension modules.
|
|
|
|
The function :cfunc:`PySpam_System` is a plain C function, declared
|
|
``static`` like everything else::
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
PySpam_System(const char *command)
|
|
{
|
|
return system(command);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The function :cfunc:`spam_system` is modified in a trivial way::
|
|
|
|
static PyObject *
|
|
spam_system(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
|
|
{
|
|
const char *command;
|
|
int sts;
|
|
|
|
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &command))
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
sts = PySpam_System(command);
|
|
return PyLong_FromLong(sts);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
In the beginning of the module, right after the line ::
|
|
|
|
#include "Python.h"
|
|
|
|
two more lines must be added::
|
|
|
|
#define SPAM_MODULE
|
|
#include "spammodule.h"
|
|
|
|
The ``#define`` is used to tell the header file that it is being included in the
|
|
exporting module, not a client module. Finally, the module's initialization
|
|
function must take care of initializing the C API pointer array::
|
|
|
|
PyMODINIT_FUNC
|
|
PyInit_spam(void)
|
|
{
|
|
PyObject *m;
|
|
static void *PySpam_API[PySpam_API_pointers];
|
|
PyObject *c_api_object;
|
|
|
|
m = PyModule_Create(&spammodule);
|
|
if (m == NULL)
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
/* Initialize the C API pointer array */
|
|
PySpam_API[PySpam_System_NUM] = (void *)PySpam_System;
|
|
|
|
/* Create a Capsule containing the API pointer array's address */
|
|
c_api_object = PyCapsule_New((void *)PySpam_API, "spam._C_API", NULL);
|
|
|
|
if (c_api_object != NULL)
|
|
PyModule_AddObject(m, "_C_API", c_api_object);
|
|
return m;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Note that ``PySpam_API`` is declared ``static``; otherwise the pointer
|
|
array would disappear when :func:`PyInit_spam` terminates!
|
|
|
|
The bulk of the work is in the header file :file:`spammodule.h`, which looks
|
|
like this::
|
|
|
|
#ifndef Py_SPAMMODULE_H
|
|
#define Py_SPAMMODULE_H
|
|
#ifdef __cplusplus
|
|
extern "C" {
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
/* Header file for spammodule */
|
|
|
|
/* C API functions */
|
|
#define PySpam_System_NUM 0
|
|
#define PySpam_System_RETURN int
|
|
#define PySpam_System_PROTO (const char *command)
|
|
|
|
/* Total number of C API pointers */
|
|
#define PySpam_API_pointers 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef SPAM_MODULE
|
|
/* This section is used when compiling spammodule.c */
|
|
|
|
static PySpam_System_RETURN PySpam_System PySpam_System_PROTO;
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
/* This section is used in modules that use spammodule's API */
|
|
|
|
static void **PySpam_API;
|
|
|
|
#define PySpam_System \
|
|
(*(PySpam_System_RETURN (*)PySpam_System_PROTO) PySpam_API[PySpam_System_NUM])
|
|
|
|
/* Return -1 on error, 0 on success.
|
|
* PyCapsule_Import will set an exception if there's an error.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int
|
|
import_spam(void)
|
|
{
|
|
PySpam_API = (void **)PyCapsule_Import("spam._C_API", 0);
|
|
return (PySpam_API != NULL) ? 0 : -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __cplusplus
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#endif /* !defined(Py_SPAMMODULE_H) */
|
|
|
|
All that a client module must do in order to have access to the function
|
|
:cfunc:`PySpam_System` is to call the function (or rather macro)
|
|
:cfunc:`import_spam` in its initialization function::
|
|
|
|
PyMODINIT_FUNC
|
|
PyInit_client(void)
|
|
{
|
|
PyObject *m;
|
|
|
|
m = PyModule_Create(&clientmodule);
|
|
if (m == NULL)
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
if (import_spam() < 0)
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
/* additional initialization can happen here */
|
|
return m;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The main disadvantage of this approach is that the file :file:`spammodule.h` is
|
|
rather complicated. However, the basic structure is the same for each function
|
|
that is exported, so it has to be learned only once.
|
|
|
|
Finally it should be mentioned that Capsules offer additional functionality,
|
|
which is especially useful for memory allocation and deallocation of the pointer
|
|
stored in a Capsule. The details are described in the Python/C API Reference
|
|
Manual in the section :ref:`capsules` and in the implementation of Capsules (files
|
|
:file:`Include/pycapsule.h` and :file:`Objects/pycapsule.c` in the Python source
|
|
code distribution).
|
|
|
|
.. rubric:: Footnotes
|
|
|
|
.. [#] An interface for this function already exists in the standard module :mod:`os`
|
|
--- it was chosen as a simple and straightforward example.
|
|
|
|
.. [#] The metaphor of "borrowing" a reference is not completely correct: the owner
|
|
still has a copy of the reference.
|
|
|
|
.. [#] Checking that the reference count is at least 1 **does not work** --- the
|
|
reference count itself could be in freed memory and may thus be reused for
|
|
another object!
|
|
|
|
.. [#] These guarantees don't hold when you use the "old" style calling convention ---
|
|
this is still found in much existing code.
|
|
|