In gh-120009 I used an atexit hook to finalize the _datetime module's static types at interpreter shutdown. However, atexit hooks are executed very early in finalization, which is a problem in the few cases where a subclass of one of those static types is still alive until the final GC collection. The static builtin types don't have this probably because they are finalized toward the end, after the final GC collection. To avoid the problem for _datetime, I have applied a similar approach here.
Also, credit goes to @mgorny and @neonene for the new tests.
FYI, I would have liked to take a slightly cleaner approach with managed static types, but wanted to get a smaller fix in first for the sake of backporting. I'll circle back to the cleaner approach with a future change on the main branch.
The tests were accidentally disabled by 2da0dc0, which didn't handle classes correctly.
I considered updating no_rerun() to support classes, but the way test_datetime.py works would have made things fairly messy. Plus, it looks like the refleaks we had encountered before have been resolved.
Some time strings that contain fractional hours or minutes are permitted
by ISO 8601, but such strings are very unlikely to be intentional. The
current parser does not parse such strings correctly or raise an error.
This change raises a ValueError when hours or minutes contain a decimal mark.
Co-authored-by: blurb-it[bot] <43283697+blurb-it[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This is minimal support. Subinterpreters are not supported yet. That will be addressed in a later change.
Co-authored-by: Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com>
* Fix `test_strptime` raises a DeprecationWarning
* Ignore deprecation warnings where appropriate.
* Update Lib/test/datetimetester.py
This is follow on work to silence unnecessary warnings from the test suite that changes for https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/70647 added.
Moves the validation for invalid years in the C implementation of the `datetime` module into a common location between `fromisoformat` and `fromisocalendar`, which improves the error message and fixes a failed assertion when parsing invalid ISO 8601 years using one of the "ISO weeks" formats.
---------
Co-authored-by: blurb-it[bot] <43283697+blurb-it[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
When replace() method is called on a subclass of datetime, date or time,
properly call derived constructor. Previously, only the base class's
constructor was called.
Also, make sure to pass non-zero fold values when creating subclasses in
various methods. Previously, fold was silently ignored.
Now the special comparison methods like `__eq__` and `__lt__` return
NotImplemented if one of comparands is date and other is datetime
instead of ignoring the time part and the time zone or forcefully
return "not equal" or raise TypeError.
It makes comparison of date and datetime subclasses more symmetric
and allows to change the default behavior by overriding
the special comparison methods in subclasses.
It is now the same as if date and datetime was independent classes.
It creates a modified copy of an object by calling the object's
__replace__() method.
It is a generalization of dataclasses.replace(), named tuple's _replace()
method and replace() methods in various classes, and supports all these
stdlib classes.
* Remove last use of `utcfromtimestamp`
This was a weirdly valid use of `utcfromtimestamp` in the sense that the "timestamps" in TZif files are not epoch times, but actually something more properly thought of as "number of seconds since 1970 in the local time zone", so even though we didn't want UTC time, `utcfromtimestamp` was still a good way to get the thing we wanted. Since we're deprecating `utcfromtimestamp`, it's just as valid to use `timedelta` arithmetic here.
We may be able to avoid the question entirely by switching these tests over to using `ZoneInfo` in the future.
* Fix a few missing DeprecationWarnings in tests
In one test, we simply turn off DeprecationWarning rather than asserting about it, because whether the error condition happens before or after the warning seems to differ between the Python and C versions.
This breaks the tests, but we are keeping it as a separate commit so
that the move operation and editing of the moved files are separate, for
a cleaner history.
Using `datetime.datetime.utcnow()` and `datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp()` will now raise a `DeprecationWarning`.
We also have removed our internal uses of these functions and documented the change.
datetime.isoformat generates the tzoffset with colons, but there
was no format code to make strftime output the same format.
for simplicity and consistency the %:z formatting behaves mostly
as %z, with the exception of adding colons. this includes the
dynamic behaviour of adding seconds and microseconds only when
needed (when not 0).
this fixes the still open "generate" part of this issue:
https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/69142
Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <59607654+kumaraditya303@users.noreply.github.com>
The `utc_to_seconds` call can fail, here's a minimal reproducer on
Linux:
TZ=UTC python -c "from datetime import *; datetime.fromtimestamp(253402300799 + 1)"
The old behavior still raised an error in a similar way, but only
because subsequent calculations happened to fail as well. Better to fail
fast.
This also refactors the tests to split out the `fromtimestamp` and
`utcfromtimestamp` tests, and to get us closer to the actual desired
limits of the functions. As part of this, we also changed the way we
detect platforms where the same limits don't necessarily apply (e.g.
Windows).
As part of refactoring the tests to hit this condition explicitly (even
though the user-facing behvior doesn't change in any way we plan to
guarantee), I noticed that there was a difference in the places that
`datetime.utcfromtimestamp` fails in the C and pure Python versions, which
was fixed by skipping the "probe for fold" logic for UTC specifically —
since UTC doesn't have any folds or gaps, we were never going to find a
fold value anyway. This should prevent some failures in the pure python
`utcfromtimestamp` method on timestamps close to 0001-01-01.
There are two separate news entries for this because one is a
potentially user-facing change, the other is an internal code
correctness change that, if anything, changes some error messages. The
two happen to be coupled because of the test refactoring, but they are
probably best thought of as independent changes.
Fixes GH-91581
Copying and pickling instances of subclasses of builtin types
bytearray, set, frozenset, collections.OrderedDict, collections.deque,
weakref.WeakSet, and datetime.tzinfo now copies and pickles instance attributes
implemented as slots.
Previously, `datetime.strptime` would match `'z'` with the format string `'%z'` (for UTC offsets), throwing an `IndexError` by erroneously trying to parse `'z'` as a timestamp. As a special case, `'%z'` matches the string `'Z'` which is equivalent to the offset `'+00:00'`, however this behavior is not defined for lowercase `'z'`.
This change ensures a `ValueError` is thrown when encountering the original example, as follows:
```
>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> datetime.strptime('z', '%z')
ValueError: time data 'z' does not match format '%z'
```
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:pganssle
{date, datetime}.isocalendar() now return a private custom named tuple object
IsoCalendarDate rather than a simple tuple.
In order to leave IsocalendarDate as a private class and to improve what
backwards compatibility is offered for pickling the result of a
datetime.isocalendar() call, add a __reduce__ method to the named tuples that
reduces them to plain tuples. (This is the part of this PR most likely to cause
problems — if it causes major issues, switching to a strucseq or equivalent
would be prudent).
The pure python implementation of IsoCalendarDate uses positional-only
arguments, since it is private and only constructed by position anyway; the
equivalent change in the argument clinic on the C side would require us to move
the forward declaration of the type above the clinic import for whatever
reason, so it seems preferable to hold off on that for now.
bpo-24416: https://bugs.python.org/issue24416
Original PR by Dong-hee Na with only minor alterations by Paul Ganssle.
Co-authored-by: Dong-hee Na <donghee.na92@gmail.com>
Different libc implementations have different behavior when presented with trailing % in strftime strings. To make test_strftime_trailing_percent more portable, compare the output of datetime.strftime directly to that of time.strftime rather than hardcoding.
* Use the 'p' format unit instead of manually called PyObject_IsTrue().
* Pass boolean value instead 0/1 integers to functions that needs boolean.
* Convert some arguments to boolean only once.