Implement `shutil._rmtree_safe_fd()` using a list as a stack to avoid emitting recursion errors on deeply nested trees.
`shutil._rmtree_unsafe()` was fixed in a150679f90.
(cherry picked from commit 53b1981fb0)
Co-authored-by: Barney Gale <barney.gale@gmail.com>
GH-89727: Partially fix `shutil.rmtree()` recursion error on deep trees (GH-119634)
Make `shutil._rmtree_unsafe()` call `os.walk()`, which is implemented
without recursion.
`shutil._rmtree_safe_fd()` is not affected and can still raise a recursion
error.
(cherry picked from commit a150679f90)
Co-authored-by: Barney Gale <barney.gale@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
* docs: tiny grammar change: "pointed by" -> "pointed to by"
This commit uses "file pointed to by" to replace "file pointed by" in
- doc for shutil.copytree
- docstring for shutil.copytree
- docstring _abc.PathBase.open
- docstring for pathlib.Path.open
- doc for os.copy_file_range
- doc for os.splice
The docs use "file pointed to by" more frequently than
"file pointed by". So, this commit replaces the uses of
"file pointed by" in order to make the uses consistent
through the docs.
```bash
$ grep -ri 'pointed to by' cpython/
```
yields more results than
```bash
$ grep -ri 'pointed by' cpython/
```
Separately:
There are two occurrences of "tree pointed by":
- cpython/Doc/library/xml.etree.elementtree.rst for
`xml.etree.ElementInclude.include`
- cpython/Lib/xml/etree/ElementInclude.py for `include`
For those uses of "tree pointed by", I expect "tree pointed to by"
instead. However, I found enough uses online of (a) "tree pointed by"
rather than (b) "tree pointed to by" to convince me that (a) is in
common use.
So, this commit does not replace those occurrences of "tree pointed by"
to "tree pointed to by". But I will replace them if a reviewer
believes it is correct to replace them.
* docs: typo: "exists and executable" -> "exists and is executable"
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew-Zipperer <atzipperer@gmail.com>
Previously it worked differently if dst is a symbolic link:
it modified the permission bits of dst itself rather than the file
it points to if follow_symlinks is true or src is not a symbolic link,
and did nothing if follow_symlinks is false and src is a symbolic link.
Also document similar changes in shutil.copystat().
* Ignore os.close() errors when ignore_errors is True.
* Pass os.close() errors to the error handler if specified.
* os.close no longer retried after error.
Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
Previously a symlink attack resistant version of shutil.rmtree() could ignore
or pass to the error handler arbitrary exception when invalid arguments
were provided.
Call also copy_python_src_ignore() on listdir() names.
shutil.copytree(): replace set() with an empty tuple. An empty tuple
becomes a constant in the compiler and checking if an item is in an
empty tuple is cheap.
Restore following CPython <= 3.10.5 behavior of shutil.make_archive()
that went away as part of gh-93160:
Do not create an empty archive if root_dir is not a directory, and, in
that case, raise FileNotFoundError or NotADirectoryError regardless
of format choice. Beyond the brought-back behavior, the function may
now also raise these exceptions in dry_run mode.
gh-82814: Adds `errno.EACCES` to the list of ignored errors on
`_copyxattr`. EPERM and EACCES are different constants but
in general should be treated the same.
News entry authored by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
It is no longer changed when create a zip or tar archive.
It is still changed for custom archivers registered with shutil.register_archive_format()
if root_dir is not None.
Co-authored-by: Éric <merwok@netwok.org>
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
It fixes the "Text File Busy" OSError when using 'rmtree' on a
windows-managed filesystem in via the VirtualBox shared folder
(and possible other scenarios like a windows-managed network file
system).
I considered only falling back when both were 0, but that still seems
wrong, and the highly popular rich[1] library does it this way, so I
thought we should probably inherit that behavior.
[1] https://github.com/willmcgugan/rich
Signed-off-by: Filipe Laíns <lains@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
`shutil.unpack_archive()` tries to read the whole file into memory, making no use of any kind of smaller buffer. Process crashes for really large files: I.e. archive: ~1.7G, unpacked: ~10G. Before the crash it can easily take away all available RAM on smaller systems. Had to pull the code form `zipfile.Zipfile.extractall()` to fix this
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:gpshead
The onerror is supposed to be called with failed function, but in this case lstat is wrongly used instead of open.
Not sure if this needs bug or not...
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:hynek
Important work originally done by @emilyemorehouse two years ago and nearly ready to go in.
This bug has affected many people and in some cases has been a dealbreaker to the adoption of the otherwise wonderful pathlib and PEP519. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33625931/copy-file-with-pathlib-in-python.
This adds the outstanding test request from that PR @vstinner (https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/5393).
Test fails without the change, passes with it, along with every other test in test_shutil.
Some variants were experimented with to make the one line change and the most performant one was picked.
# Added Test for PathLike directory destination, the current fail case
```
Lib/test/test_shutil.py::TestMove::test_move_file_pathlike FAILED [100%]
============================================================== FAILURES ===============================================================
__________________________________________________ TestMove.test_move_file_pathlike ___________________________________________________
self = <test.test_shutil.TestMove testMethod=test_move_file_pathlike>
def test_move_file_pathlike(self):
# Move a file to another location on the same filesystem.
src = pathlib.Path(self.src_file)
> self._check_move_file(src, self.dst_dir, self.dst_file)
Lib/test/test_shutil.py:1563:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Lib/test/test_shutil.py:1545: in _check_move_file
shutil.move(src, dst)
/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/shutil.py:562: in move
real_dst = os.path.join(dst, _basename(src))
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
path = PosixPath('/var/folders/r2/psq74t5x3nbfzlph8bh2pvdw0000gn/T/tmp9ie0wh9_/foo')
def _basename(path):
# A basename() variant which first strips the trailing slash, if present.
# Thus we always get the last component of the path, even for directories.
sep = os.path.sep + (os.path.altsep or '')
> return os.path.basename(path.rstrip(sep))
E AttributeError: 'PosixPath' object has no attribute 'rstrip'
/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/shutil.py:526: AttributeError
============================================== 1 failed, 102 deselected in 0.30 seconds ===============================================
```
After change:
```
========================================================= test session starts =========================================================
platform darwin -- Python 3.7.4, pytest-5.0.1, py-1.8.0, pluggy-0.12.0 -- /Users/maxwellmckinnon/.venvs/TA3.7/bin/python3.7
cachedir: .pytest_cache
rootdir: /Users/maxwellmckinnon/dev/cpython
plugins: cov-2.7.1, mock-1.10.4
collected 103 items / 102 deselected / 1 selected
Lib/test/test_shutil.py::TestMove::test_move_file_pathlike PASSED [100%]
============================================== 1 passed, 102 deselected in 0.06 seconds ===============================================
```
Running all the tests in test_shutil.py
```
╰─ pytest Lib/test/test_shutil.py -v
========================================================= test session starts =========================================================
platform darwin -- Python 3.7.4, pytest-5.0.1, py-1.8.0, pluggy-0.12.0 -- /Users/maxwellmckinnon/.venvs/TA3.7/bin/python3.7
cachedir: .pytest_cache
rootdir: /Users/maxwellmckinnon/dev/cpython
plugins: cov-2.7.1, mock-1.10.4
collected 103 items
Lib/test/test_shutil.py::TestShutil::test_chown PASSED [ 0%]
Lib/test/test_shutil.py::TestShutil::test_copy PASSED [ 1%]
...
Lib/test/test_shutil.py::TermsizeTests::test_stty_match SKIPPED [ 99%]
Lib/test/test_shutil.py::PublicAPITests::test_module_all_attribute PASSED [100%]
================================================ 96 passed, 7 skipped in 1.25 seconds =================================================
```
# Performance Considerations
Is it considered poor form to get rid of _basename altogether and make use of pathlib in the move function? I'm not sure if the idea is for all these modules to strictly avoid circular dependencies. They are already using os.path which is just as much a citizen in 3.8 as pathlib right?
e.g.
`real_dst = os.path.join(dst, _basename(src))`
becomes
`real_dst = Path(dst) / Path(src).name`
I've looked around and familiarized myself, and I now think importing pathlib here is fine. My only remaining concern is that of performance.
Here's the performance difference for this step.
```
In [46]: %timeit real_dst = os.path.join("a/b/c", _basename('b/'))
2.71 µs ± 62.6 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100000 loops each)
In [47]: %timeit real_dst = Path("a/b/c") / Path('b/').name
12.4 µs ± 65.3 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100000 loops each)
```
Is 10us significant or insignificant compared to the least expensive operation this function will do? I don't know. Let's find out.
```
In [55]: %timeit os.rename('/tmp/a/a.txt', '/tmp/a/b.txt'); os.rename('/tmp/a/b.txt', '/tmp/a/a.txt')
124 µs ± 2.18 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000 loops each)
```
62us to rename. 10us seems significant enough that we wouldn't want to favor the Path sugar suggestion. 16% speed decrease from adding the 10us.
What do people think? I was hoping to get to use pathlib.Path here, but I suspect for this low level move, it should be as fast as possible, and 16% is not worth one line of sugary code to me.
https://bugs.python.org/issue32689
Automerge-Triggered-By: @gvanrossum