* Clean up unused variables and imports in the email module
* Remove extra newline char
* Remove superflous dict+unpacking syntax
* Remove unused 'msg' var
* Clean up unused variables and imports in the email module
* Remove extra newline char
* Remove superflous dict+unpacking syntax
* Remove unused 'msg' var
---------
Co-authored-by: Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org>
It was raised if the charset itself contains characters not encodable
in UTF-8 (in particular \udcxx characters representing non-decodable
bytes in the source).
* bpo-39040: Fix parsing of email headers with encoded-words inside a quoted string.
It is fairly common to find malformed mime headers (especially content-disposition
headers) where the parameter values, instead of being encoded to RFC
standards, are "encoded" by doing RFC 2047 "encoded word" encoding, and
then enclosing the whole thing in quotes. The processing of these malformed
headers was incorrectly leaving the spaces between encoded words in the decoded
text (whitespace between adjacent encoded words is supposed to be stripped on
decoding). This changeset fixes the encoded word processing inside quoted strings
(bare-quoted-string) to do correct RFC 2047 decoding by stripping that
whitespace.
parse_message_id() was improperly using a token defined inside an exception
handler, which was raising `UnboundLocalError` on parsing an invalid value.
https://bugs.python.org/issue38698
Fixes a case in which email._header_value_parser.get_unstructured hangs the system for some invalid headers. This covers the cases in which the header contains either:
- a case without trailing whitespace
- an invalid encoded word
https://bugs.python.org/issue37764
This fix should also be backported to 3.7 and 3.8
https://bugs.python.org/issue37764
Special characters in email address header display names are normally
put within double quotes. However, encoded words (=?charset?x?...?=) are
not allowed withing double quotes. When the header contains a word with
special characters and another word that must be encoded, the first one
must also be encoded.
In the next example, the display name in the From header is quoted and
therefore the comma is allowed; in the To header, the comma is not
within quotes and not encoded, which is not allowed and therefore
rejected by some mail servers.
From: "Foo Bar, France" <foo@example.com>
To: Foo Bar, =?utf-8?q?Espa=C3=B1a?= <foo@example.com>
https://bugs.python.org/issue37482
This should fix the IndexError trying to retrieve `DisplayName.display_name` and `DisplayName.value` when the `value` is basically an empty string.
https://bugs.python.org/issue32178
* bpo-37461: Fix infinite loop in parsing of specially crafted email headers.
Some crafted email header would cause the get_parameter method to run in an
infinite loop causing a DoS attack surface when parsing those headers. This
patch fixes that by making sure the DQUOTE character is handled to prevent
going into an infinite loop.
As far as I can tell, this infinite loop would be triggered if:
1. The value being folded contains a single word (no spaces) longer than
max_line_length
2. The max_line_length is shorter than the encoding's name + 9
characters.
bpo-36564: https://bugs.python.org/issue36564
* patched string index out of range error in get_word function of _header_value_parser.py and created tests in test__header_value_parser.py for CFWS.
* Raise HeaderParseError instead of continuing when parsing a word.
* bpo-36520: reset the encoded word offset when starting a new
line during an email header folding operation
* 📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
* bpo-36520: add an additional test case, and provide descriptive
comments for the test_folding_with_utf8_encoding_* tests
* bpo-36520: fix whitespace issue
* bpo-36520: changes per reviewer request -- remove extraneous
backslashes; add whitespace between terminating quotes and
line-continuation backslashes; use "bpo-" instead of
"issue #" in comments
* bpo-21315: Fix parsing of encoded words with missing leading ws.
Because of missing leading whitespace, encoded word would get parsed as
unstructured token. This patch fixes that by looking for encoded words when
splitting tokens with whitespace.
Missing trailing whitespace around encoded word now register a defect
instead.
Original patch suggestion by David R. Murray on bpo-21315.
* bpo-35805: Add parser for Message-ID header.
This parser is based on the definition of Identification Fields from RFC 5322
Sec 3.6.4.
This should also prevent folding of Message-ID header using RFC 2047 encoded
words and hence fix bpo-35805.
* Prevent folding of non-ascii message-id headers.
* Add fold method to MsgID token to prevent folding.
Two kind of mistakes:
1. Missed space. After concatenating there is no space between words.
2. Missed comma. Causes unintentional concatenating in a list of strings.
The original algorithm tried to delegate the folding to the tokens so
that those tokens whose folding rules differed could specify the
differences. However, this resulted in a lot of duplicated code because
most of the rules were the same.
The new algorithm moves all folding logic into a set of functions
external to the token classes, but puts the information about which
tokens can be folded in which ways on the tokens...with the exception of
mime-parameters, which are a special case (which was not even
implemented in the old folder).
This algorithm can still probably be improved and hopefully simplified
somewhat.
Note that some of the test expectations are changed. I believe the
changes are toward more desirable and consistent behavior: in general
when (re) folding a line the canonical version of the tokens is
generated, rather than preserving errors or extra whitespace.
Leading whitespace was incorrectly dropped during folding of certain lines in the _header_value_parser's folding algorithm. This makes the whitespace handling code consistent.
This could use more edge case tests, but the basic functionality is tested.
(Note that this changeset does not add tailored support for the RFC 6532
message/global MIME type, but the email package generic facilities will handle
it.)
Reviewed by Maciej Szulik.
This mimics get_param's error handling for the most part. It is slightly
better in some regards as get_param can produce some really weird results for
duplicate *0* parts. It departs from get_param slightly in that if we have a
mix of non-extended and extended pieces for the same parameter name, the new
parser assumes they were all supposed to be extended and concatenates all the
values, whereas get_param always picks the non-extended parameter value. All
of this error recovery is pretty much arbitrary decisions...
This applies only to the new parser. The old parser decodes encoded words
inside quoted strings already, although it gets the whitespace wrong
when it does so.
This version of the patch only handles the most common case (a single encoded
word surrounded by quotes), but I haven't seen any other variations of this in
the wild yet, so its good enough for now.
There is more to be done here in terms of accepting RFC invalid
input that some mailers accept, but this covers the valid
RFC places where encoded words can occur in structured headers.
The problem was I was only checking for decimal digits after the third '?',
not for *hex* digits :(.
This changeset also fixes a couple of comment typos, deletes an unused
function relating to encoded word parsing, and removed an invalid
'if' test from the folding function that was revealed by the tests
written to validate this issue.
This code passes all the same tests that the existing RFC mime header
parser passes, plus a bunch of additional ones.
There are a couple of commented out tests where there are issues with the
folding. The folding doesn't normally get invoked for headers parsed from
source, and the cases are marginal anyway (headers with invalid binary data)
so I'm not worried about them, but will fix them after the beta.
There are things that can be done to make this API even more convenient, but I
think this is a solid foundation worth having. And the parser is a full RFC
parser, so it handles cases that the current parser doesn't. (There are also
probably cases where it fails when the current parser doesn't, but I haven't
found them yet ;)
Oh, yeah, and there are some really ugly bits in the parser for handling some
'postel' cases that are unfortunately common.
I hope/plan to to eventually refactor a lot of the code in the parser which
should reduce the line count...but there is no escaping the fact that the
error recovery is welter of special cases.
JosephSBoyle
oda-gitso
Serhiy Storchaka
Abhilash Raj
Claudiu Popa
Andrei Troie
Ashwin Ramaswami
bsiem
jpic
Paul Ganssle
websurfer5
Xtreak
Krzysztof Wojcik
Jens Troeger
Inada Naoki
Dong-hee Na
Leo Arias
jayyyin
R. David Murray
Joel Hillacre
Martin Panter
Ezio Melotti
Victor Stinner
Terry Jan Reedy
Philip Jenvey