When checking for auto() instances, only top-level usage is supported,
which means either alone or as part of a regular tuple. Other
containers, such as lists, dicts, or namedtuples, will not have auto()
transformed into a value.
* use final status to determine lookup or create
* 📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
Co-authored-by: blurb-it[bot] <43283697+blurb-it[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
[Enum] fix negative number infinite loop
- _iter_bits_lsb() now raises a ValueError if a negative number
is passed in
- verify() now skips checking negative numbers for named flags
* fix auto() failure during multiple assignment
i.e. `ONE = auto(), 'text'` will now have `ONE' with the value of `(1,
'text')`. Before it would have been `(<an auto instance>, 'text')`
This removes the performance regression in 3.11, **at the expense of not fixing
the "bug" that allows accessing values from values** (e.g. `Color.RED.BLUE`).
Using the benchmark @markshannon [presented](https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/93910#issuecomment-1165503032), the results are:
| Version | Enum | Fast enum | Normal class |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3.10 | 2.04 | 0.59 | 0.56 |
| 3.11 | 2.78 | 0.31 | 0.15 |
| This PR | 1.30 | 0.32 | 0.16 |
I share this mostly as information about the source of the regression, as this may be useful. It may be that the lower-risk approach for the beta is just to revert to a previously-known working state.
When used with plain Enum, auto() returns the last numeric value assigned, skipping any incompatible member values (such as strings); starting in 3.13 the default auto() for plain Enums will require all the values to be of compatible types, and will return a new value that is 1 higher than any existing value.
Co-authored-by: Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
GH-26658 introduced a regression in copy / pickle protocol for combined
`enum.Flag`s. `copy.copy(re.A | re.I)` would fail with
`AttributeError: ASCII|IGNORECASE`.
`enum.Flag` now has a `__reduce_ex__()` method that reduces flags by
combined value, not by combined name.
In previous versions of Python if an IntEnum member was combined with another integer type value using a bit-wise operation, the resulting value would still be the IntEnum type. This change restores that behavior.
- add member() and nonmember() functions
- add deprecation warning for internal classes in enums not
becoming members in 3.13
Co-authored-by: edwardcwang
Undo rejected PEP-663 changes:
- restore `repr()` to its 3.10 status
- restore `str()` to its 3.10 status
New changes:
- `IntEnum` and `IntFlag` now leave `__str__` as the original `int.__str__` so that str() and format() return the same result
- zero-valued flags without a name have a slightly changed repr(), e.g. `repr(Color(0)) == '<Color: 0>'`
- update `dir()` for mixed-in types to return all the methods and attributes of the mixed-in type
- added `_numeric_repr_` to `Flag` to control display of unnamed values
- enums without doc strings have a more comprehensive doc string added
- `ReprEnum` added -- inheriting from this makes it so only `__repr__` is replaced, not `__str__` nor `__format__`; `IntEnum`, `IntFlag`, and `StrEnum` all inherit from `ReprEnum`
In `__set_name__` there is a check for the `_value_` attribute and an attempt to add it if missing; this adds a test to cover the case for simple enums with a custom `__new__` method.
add tests that exercise the `_missing_` error path for `Flag` and `IntFlag`
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
Modify the ``EnumType.__dir__()`` and ``Enum.__dir__()`` to ensure
that user-defined methods and methods inherited from mixin classes always
show up in the output of `help()`. This change also makes it easier for
IDEs to provide auto-completion.
* Fix typo in __repr__ code
* Add more tests for global int flag reprs
* use last module if multi-module string
- when an enum's `__module__` contains several module names, only
use the last one
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
Co-authored-by: Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
* [Enum] reduce scope of new format behavior
Instead of treating all Enums the same for format(), only user mixed-in
enums will be affected. In other words, IntEnum and IntFlag will not be
changing the format() behavior, due to the requirement that they be
drop-in replacements of existing integer constants.
If a user creates their own integer-based enum, then the new behavior
will apply:
class Grades(int, Enum):
A = 5
B = 4
C = 3
D = 2
F = 0
Now: format(Grades.B) -> DeprecationWarning and '4'
3.12: -> no warning, and 'B'
by-value lookups could fail on complex enums, necessitating a check for
__reduce__ and possibly sabotaging the final enum;
by-name lookups should never fail, and sabotaging is no longer necessary
for class-based enum creation.
Ethan Furman
Nikita Sobolev
Michael Droettboom
Serhiy Storchaka
Sam Ezeh
Oscar R
Carl Bordum Hansen
Christian Heimes
Dong-hee Na
Kumar Aditya
Victor Stinner
Alex Waygood
Pablo Galindo Salgado
Brandon Schabell