This parameter was accidentally removed when fixing
https://bugs.python.org/issue45129, this reverts the unnecessary changes
there.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
Due to significant security concerns, the reuse_address parameter of
asyncio.loop.create_datagram_endpoint, deprecated in Python 3.9, is
now removed. This is because of the behavior of the socket option
SO_REUSEADDR in UDP.
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
Remove the @asyncio.coroutine decorator
enabling legacy generator-based coroutines to be compatible with async/await
code; remove asyncio.coroutines.CoroWrapper used for wrapping
legacy coroutine objects in the debug mode.
The decorator has been deprecated
since Python 3.8 and the removal was initially scheduled for Python 3.10.
* [Enum] reduce scope of new format behavior
Instead of treating all Enums the same for format(), only user mixed-in
enums will be affected. In other words, IntEnum and IntFlag will not be
changing the format() behavior, due to the requirement that they be
drop-in replacements of existing integer constants.
If a user creates their own integer-based enum, then the new behavior
will apply:
class Grades(int, Enum):
A = 5
B = 4
C = 3
D = 2
F = 0
Now: format(Grades.B) -> DeprecationWarning and '4'
3.12: -> no warning, and 'B'
asyncio.get_event_loop() emits now a deprecation warning when it creates a new event loop.
In future releases it will became an alias of asyncio.get_running_loop().
test_unix_events.py no longer checks if waitstatus_to_exitcode() mock
has been called or not to make the test more functional, rather than
checking the exact implementation.
This is my first issue!
So, if there's anything wrong, please tell me!
Also, thank you always for all the contributors!
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:asvetlov
* Update code after merge review from 1st1
* Use a sentinel approach for loop parameter
Remove unnecessary _get_running_loop patching
* Use more clear function name (_verify_parameter_is_marker -> _verify_no_loop)
* Add init method to _LoopBoundMixin to check that loop param wasn't used
# Improve asyncio.wait function
The original code creates the futures set two times.
We can create this set before, avoiding the second creation.
This new behaviour [breaks the aiokafka library](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiokafka/pull/672), because it gives an iterator to that function, so the second iteration become empty.
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:1st1
* bpo-41696: Fix handling of debug mode in asyncio.run
This allows PYTHONASYNCIODEBUG or -X dev to enable asyncio debug mode
when using asyncio.run
* 📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
Co-authored-by: hauntsaninja <>
Co-authored-by: blurb-it[bot] <43283697+blurb-it[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Stopping and restarting a proactor event loop on windows can lead to
spurious errors logged (ConnectionResetError while reading from the
self pipe). This fixes the issue by ensuring that we don't attempt
to start multiple copies of the self-pipe reading loop.
Currently, if `asyncio.wait_for()` itself is cancelled it will always
raise `CancelledError` regardless if the underlying task is still
running. This is similar to a race with the timeout, which is handled
already.
When I was fixing bpo-32751 back in GH-7216 I missed the case when
*timeout* is zero or negative. This takes care of that.
Props to @aaliddell for noticing the inconsistency.
asyncio.AbstractEventLoop.run_in_executor should be a method that returns an asyncio Future, not an async method.
This matches the concrete implementations, and the documentation better.
Kumar Aditya
Nikita Sobolev
Andrew Svetlov
Jim Crist-Harif
Kumar Aditya
Sam Bull
Gregory P. Smith
Joongi Kim
Christian Clauss
Hugo van Kemenade
Jesús Cea
Mariusz Felisiak
Illia Volochii
Ethan Furman
Binbin
Pablo Galindo
Christian Heimes
Roberto Hueso
Serhiy Storchaka
Richard Kojedzinszky
Chris Jerdonek
Victor Stinner
Zackery Spytz
Wansoo Kim
Yurii Karabas
Alex Grönholm
Diogo Dutra
Jakub Stasiak
Shantanu
Ben Darnell
Elvis Pranskevichus
Cleber Rosa
James Weaver