to kill a cygwin instance. build\\python.exe was matching a normal windows
instance. Prefix that with a \\ to ensure build is a directory and not
PCbuild. As discussed on python-dev.
In general, C doesn't define anything about what happens when
an operation on a signed integral type overflows, and PyOS_strtol()
did several formally undefined things of that nature on signed
longs. Some version of gcc apparently tries to exploit that now,
and PyOS_strtol() could fail to detect overflow then.
Tried to repair all that, although it seems at least as likely to me
that we'll get screwed by bad platform definitions for LONG_MIN
and/or LONG_MAX now. For that reason, I don't recommend backporting
this.
Note that I have no box on which this makes a lick of difference --
can't really test it, except to note that it didn't break anything
on my boxes.
Silent change: PyOS_strtol() used to return the hard-coded 0x7fffffff
in case of overflow. Now it returns LONG_MAX. They're the same only on
32-bit boxes (although C doesn't guarantee that either ...).
it into email 4.0. Specifically, in Message.get_content_charset(), handle RFC
2231 headers that contain an encoding not known to Python, or a character in
the data that isn't in the charset encoding. Also forward port the
appropriate unit tests.
This adds a new key definition for OSX, which is slightly different from the
classic mac definition.
Also add NEWS item for a couple of bugfixes I added recently.
without causing problems for anyone that is on a case-insensitive filesystem).
Setup.py tries to compile the MacOS extension from MacOSmodule.c, while the
actual file is named macosmodule.c. This is no problem on the (default)
case-insensitive filesystem, but doesn't work on case-sensitive filesystems.
to guess /which/ line the spawned thread is in at the time
sys._current_frames() is called: we know it finished
enter_g.set(), but can't know whether the instruction
counter has advanced to the following leave_g.wait().
The latter is overwhelming most likely, but not guaranteed,
and I see that the "x86 Ubuntu dapper (icc) trunk" buildbot
found it on the other line once. Changed the test so it
passes in either case.
it definitely could use some review to ensure I'm not off by one
and there's no possible overflow/wrap-around of bytes_left.
Reported by Klocwork #1.
Fix a problem if there is a failure allocating self->db.
Found with failmalloc.