Issue #26588:
* Pass the hash table rather than the key size to hash and compare functions
* _Py_HASHTABLE_READ_KEY() and _Py_HASHTABLE_ENTRY_READ_KEY() macros now expect
the hash table as the first parameter, rather than the key size
* tracemalloc_get_traces_fill(): use _Py_HASHTABLE_ENTRY_READ_DATA() rather
than pointer dereference
* Remove the _Py_HASHTABLE_ENTRY_WRITE_PKEY() macro
* Move "PKEY" and "PDATA" macros inside hashtable.c
* Optimize tracemalloc_add_trace(): modify hashtable entry data (trace) if the
memory block is already tracked, rather than trying to remove the old trace
and then add a new trace.
* Add _Py_HASHTABLE_ENTRY_WRITE_DATA() macro
Issue #26588: Remove _Py_hashtable_delete() from hashtable.h since the function
is not used. Keep the C code in hashtable.c as commented code if someone needs
it later.
Issue #26588: Remove copy_data, free_data and get_data_size callbacks from
hashtable.h. These callbacks are not used in Python and makes the code more
complex.
Remove also the _Py_HASHTABLE_ENTRY_DATA_AS_VOID_P() macro which uses an unsafe
pointer dereference (can cause memory alignment issue). Replace the macro usage
with _Py_HASHTABLE_ENTRY_READ_DATA() which is implemented with the safe
memcpy() function.
Issue #26588: hashtable.h now supports keys of any size, not only
sizeof(void*). It allows to support key larger than sizeof(void*), but also to
use less memory for key smaller than sizeof(void*).
Change pushed by mistake, the patch is still under review :-/
"""
_tracemalloc: add domain to trace keys
* hashtable.h: key has now a variable size
* _tracemalloc uses (pointer: void*, domain: unsigned int) as key for traces
"""
Christian Heimes
Victor Stinner