Fixes unittest.mock.patch not enforcing function signatures for methods
decorated with @classmethod or @staticmethod when patch is called with
autospec=True.
Mock objects which are not unsafe will now raise an AttributeError when accessing an
attribute that matches the name of an assertion but without the prefix `assert_`, e.g. accessing `called_once` instead of `assert_called_once`.
This is in addition to this already happening for accessing attributes with prefixes assert, assret, asert, aseert, and assrt.
The inspect version was not working with unittest.mock.AsyncMock.
The fix introduces special-casing of AsyncMock in
`inspect.iscoroutinefunction` equivalent to the one
performed in `asyncio.iscoroutinefunction`.
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
Remove the undocumented private float.__set_format__() method,
previously known as float.__set_format__() in Python 3.7. Its
docstring said: "You probably don't want to use this function. It
exists mainly to be used in Python's test suite."
* Restrict using Mock objects as specs as this is always a test bug where the resulting mock is misleadingly useless.
* Skip a broken test that exposes a bug elsewhere in mock (noted in the original issue).
patch, patch.object and create_autospec silently ignore misspelled
arguments such as autospect, auto_spec and set_spec. This can lead
to tests failing to check what they are supposed to check.
This change adds a check causing a RuntimeError if the above
functions get any of the above misspellings as arguments. It also
adds a new argument, "unsafe", which can be set to True to disable
this check.
Also add "!r" to format specifiers in added error messages.
This is a follow-up to
4662fa9bfe.
That original commit expanded guards against misspelling assertions on
mocks. This follow-up updates the documentation and improves the error
message by pointing out the potential cause and solution.
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:gpshead
Currently, a Mock object which is not unsafe will raise an
AttributeError if an attribute with the prefix assert or assret is
accessed on it. This protects against misspellings of real assert
method calls, which lead to tests passing silently even if the tested
code does not satisfy the intended assertion.
Recently a check was done in a large code base (Google) and three
more frequent ways of misspelling assert were found causing harm:
asert, aseert, assrt. These are now added to the existing check.
* use the `: pass` and `: yield` patterns for code that isn't expected to ever be executed.
* The _Call items passed to _AnyComparer are only ever of length two, so assert instead of if/else
* fix typo
* Fix bug, where stop-without-start patching dict blows up with `TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable`, highlighted by lack of coverage of an except branch.
* The fix for bpo-37972 means _Call.count and _Call.index are no longer needed.
* add coverage for calling next() on a mock_open with readline.return_value set.
* __aiter__ is defined on the Mock so the one on _AsyncIterator is never called.
Replace check for whether something is a method in the mock module. The
previous version fails on PyPy, because there no method wrappers exist
(everything looks like a regular Python-defined function). Thus the
isinstance(getattr(result, '__get__', None), MethodWrapperTypes) check
returns True for any descriptor, not just methods.
This condition could also return erroneously True in CPython for
C-defined descriptors.
Instead to decide whether something is a method, just check directly
whether it's a function defined on the class. This passes all tests on
CPython and fixes the bug on PyPy.
As the function was not registering in the active patches, the mocks
started by `mock.patch.dict` were not being stopped when
`mock.patch.stopall` was being called.
The fix in PR 13261 handled the underlying issue about the spec for specific methods not being applied correctly, but it didn't fix the issue that was causing the misleading error message.
The code currently grabs a list of responses from _call_matcher (which may include exceptions). But it doesn't reach inside the list when checking if the result is an exception. This results in a misleading error message when one of the provided calls does not match the spec.
https://bugs.python.org/issue36871
Automerge-Triggered-By: @gpshead
In the format string for assert_called the evaluation order is incorrect and hence for mock's without name, 'None' is printed whereas it should be 'mock' like for other messages. The error message is ("Expected '%s' to have been called." % self._mock_name or 'mock').
* Flip equality to use mock calls' __eq__
* bpo-37555: Regression test demonstrating assert_has_calls not working with ANY and spec_set
Co-authored-by: Neal Finne <neal@nealfinne.com>
* Revert "Flip equality to use mock calls' __eq__"
This reverts commit 94ddf54c5a.
* bpo-37555: Add regression tests for mock ANY ordering issues
Add regression tests for whether __eq__ is order agnostic on _Call and _CallList, which is useful for comparisons involving ANY, especially if the ANY comparison is to a class not defaulting __eq__ to NotImplemented.
Co-authored-by: Neal Finne <neal@nealfinne.com>
* bpo-37555: Fix _CallList and _Call order sensitivity
_Call and _CallList depend on ordering to correctly process that an object being compared to ANY with __eq__ should return True. This fix updates the comparison to check both a == b and b == a and return True if either condition is met, fixing situations from the tests in the previous two commits where assertEqual would not be commutative if checking _Call or _CallList objects. This seems like a reasonable fix considering that the Python data model specifies that if an object doesn't know how to compare itself to another object it should return NotImplemented, and that on getting NotImplemented from a == b, it should try b == a, implying that good behavior for __eq__ is commutative. This also flips the order of comparison in _CallList's __contains__ method, guaranteeing ANY will be on the left and have it's __eq__ called for equality checking, fixing the interaction between assert_has_calls and ANY.
Co-author: Neal Finne <neal@neal.finne.com>
* bpo-37555: Ensure _call_matcher returns _Call object
* Adding ACK and news entry
* bpo-37555: Replacing __eq__ with == to sidestep NotImplemented
bool(NotImplemented) returns True, so it's necessary to use ==
instead of __eq__ in this comparison.
* bpo-37555: cleaning up changes unnecessary to the final product
* bpo-37555: Fixed call on bound arguments to respect args and kwargs
* Revert "bpo-37555: Add regression tests for mock ANY ordering issues"
This reverts commit 49c5310ad4.
* Revert "bpo-37555: cleaning up changes unnecessary to the final product"
This reverts commit 18e964ba01.
* Revert "bpo-37555: Replacing __eq__ with == to sidestep NotImplemented"
This reverts commit f295eaca5b.
* Revert "bpo-37555: Fix _CallList and _Call order sensitivity"
This reverts commit 874fb697b8.
* Updated NEWS.d
* bpo-37555: Add tests checking every function using _call_matcher both with and without spec
* bpo-37555: Ensure all assert methods using _call_matcher are actually passing calls
* Remove AnyCompare and use call objects everywhere.
* Revert "Remove AnyCompare and use call objects everywhere."
This reverts commit 24973c0b32.
* Check for exception in assert_any_await
Tomas R
Nikita Sobolev
Christian Klein
Shantanu
Carl Meyer
andrei kulakov
noah-weingarden
Mehdi ABAAKOUK
Victor Stinner
Matthew Suozzo
Irit Katriel
Serhiy Storchaka
Thomas Grainger
Jack DeVries
Binbin
vabr-g
idanw206
Karthikeyan Singaravelan
Chris Withers
Carl Friedrich Bolz-Tereick
Vegard Stikbakke
Paulo Henrique Silva
Matthew Kokotovich
Mario Corchero
Elena Oat
Jason Fried
Lisa Roach
Samuel Freilich
Abraham Toriz Cruz
marcoramirezmx
Michael Foord
Elizabeth Uselton