* Uncomment builtin removal in pairindextypes
* Use new-style index directive ('builtin') - C API
* Use new-style index directive ('builtin') - Extending
* Use new-style index directive ('builtin') - Library
* Use new-style index directive ('builtin') - Reference
* Use new-style index directive ('builtin') - Tutorial
* Uncomment object removal in pairindextypes
* Use new-style index directive ('object') - C API
* Use new-style index directive ('object') - Library
* Use new-style index directive ('object') - Reference
* Use new-style index directive ('object') - Tutorial
* Use new-style index directive ('module') - C API
* Use new-style index directive ('module') - Library
* Use new-style index directive ('module') - Reference
* Use new-style index directive ('module') - Tutorial
* Uncomment module removal in pairindextypes
* Use new-style index directive ('module') - C API
* Use new-style index directive ('module') - Library
* Use new-style index directive ('module') - Reference
The bitwise inversion operator on bool returns the bitwise inversion of the
underlying int value; i.e. `~True == -2` such that `bool(~True) == True`.
It's a common pitfall that users mistake `~` as negation operator and actually
want `not`. Supporting `~` is an artifact of bool inheriting from int. Since there
is no real use-case for the current behavior, let's deprecate `~` on bool and
later raise an error. This removes a potential source errors for users.
Full reasoning: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/82012#issuecomment-1258705971
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
- Remove first link to lexical definition of integer literal, since it
doesn't apply (differs in handling of leading zeros, base needs to be
explicitly specified, unicode digits are allowed)
- Better describe handling of leading zeros, unicode digits, underscores
- Base 0 does not work exactly as like a code literal, since it allows
Unicode digits. Link code literal to lexical definition of integer
literal.
All the arguments are positional-only.
The current status after #99476 seems to be to not use positional-only
markers in documentation, hence I've simply removed it.
Integer to and from text conversions via CPython's bignum `int` type is not safe against denial of service attacks due to malicious input. Very large input strings with hundred thousands of digits can consume several CPU seconds.
This PR comes fresh from a pile of work done in our private PSRT security response team repo.
Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes [Red Hat] <christian@python.org>
Tons-of-polishing-up-by: Gregory P. Smith [Google] <greg@krypto.org>
Reviews via the private PSRT repo via many others (see the NEWS entry in the PR).
<!-- gh-issue-number: gh-95778 -->
* Issue: gh-95778
<!-- /gh-issue-number -->
I wrote up [a one pager for the release managers](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KjuF_aXlzPUxTK4BMgezGJ2Pn7uevfX7g0_mvgHlL7Y/edit#). Much of that text wound up in the Issue. Backports PRs already exist. See the issue for links.
* Revert "bpo-42843: Keep Sphinx 1.8 and Sphinx 2 compatibility (GH-24282)"
This reverts commit 5c1f15b4b1
* Revert "bpo-42579: Make workaround for various versions of Sphinx more robust (GH-23662)"
This reverts commit b63a620014.
Add a closure keyword-only parameter to exec(). It can only be specified when exec-ing a code object that uses free variables. When specified, it must be a tuple, with exactly the number of cell variables referenced by the code object. closure has a default value of None, and it must be None if the code object doesn't refer to any free variables.
Raymond Hettinger
Adam Turner
Ezio Melotti
Serhiy Storchaka
wim glenn
Terry Jan Reedy
Owain Davies
F3eQnxN3RriK
Ned Batchelder
Tim Hoffmann
Barry Warsaw
Nikita Sobolev
C.A.M. Gerlach
Stefan Pochmann
Furkan Onder
JustAnotherArchivist
Shantanu
Stanley
Julien Palard
Nouran Ali
Jeff Allen
Gregory P. Smith
Gregory P. Smith
Dong-hee Na
Rafael Fontenelle
larryhastings
Yurii Karabas
Inada Naoki
Zackery Spytz