Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jacob Bower 8de59c1bb9
gh-102021 : Allow multiple input files for interpreter loop generator (#102022)
The input files no longer use `-i`.
2023-03-03 20:59:21 -08:00
Guido van Rossum acf9184e6b
GH-98831: Support cache effects in super- and macro instructions (#99601) 2022-12-02 19:57:30 -08:00
Guido van Rossum 8f18ac04d3
GH-98831: Add `macro` and `op` and their implementation to DSL (#99495)
Newly supported interpreter definition syntax:
- `op(NAME, (input_stack_effects -- output_stack_effects)) { ... }`
- `macro(NAME) = OP1 + OP2;`

Also some other random improvements:
- Convert `WITH_EXCEPT_START` to use stack effects
- Fix lexer to balk at unrecognized characters, e.g. `@`
- Fix moved output names; support object pointers in cache
- Introduce `error()` method to print errors
- Introduce read_uint16(p) as equivalent to `*p`

Co-authored-by: Brandt Bucher <brandtbucher@gmail.com>
2022-11-22 16:04:57 -08:00
Guido van Rossum 4f5e1cb00a
GH-98831: Refactor and fix cases generator (#99526)
Also complete cache effects for BINARY_SUBSCR family.
2022-11-17 17:06:07 -08:00
Guido van Rossum 41bc101dd6
GH-98831: "Generate" the interpreter (#98830)
The switch cases (really TARGET(opcode) macros) have been moved from ceval.c to generated_cases.c.h. That file is generated from instruction definitions in bytecodes.c (which impersonates a C file so the C code it contains can be edited without custom support in e.g. VS Code).

The code generator lives in Tools/cases_generator (it has a README.md explaining how it works). The DSL used to describe the instructions is a work in progress, described in https://github.com/faster-cpython/ideas/blob/main/3.12/interpreter_definition.md.

This is surely a work-in-progress. An easy next step could be auto-generating super-instructions.

**IMPORTANT: Merge Conflicts**

If you get a merge conflict for instruction implementations in ceval.c, your best bet is to port your changes to bytecodes.c. That file looks almost the same as the original cases, except instead of `TARGET(NAME)` it uses `inst(NAME)`, and the trailing `DISPATCH()` call is omitted (the code generator adds it automatically).
2022-11-02 21:31:26 -07:00