[bpo-34658](https://www.bugs.python.org/issue34658): Fix a rare interpreter unhandled exception state SystemError only
seen when using subprocess with a preexec_fn while an after_parent handler has
been registered with os.register_at_fork and the fork system call fails.
https://bugs.python.org/issue34658
This causes the tearDown code to only unimport the test modules specifically created as part of each test via the self.mkhier method rather than abusing test.support.modules_setup() and the scary test.support.modules_cleanup() code.
https://bugs.python.org/issue34200
Returning EINTR from pthread semaphore or lock acquisition is an optional POSIX
feature. musl does not provide this feature, so some threadsignal tests fail
when Python is built against it.
There's no good way to test for musl, so we skip if we're on Linux and not using
glibc pthreads.
Also, hedge in the threading documentation about when we can provide interrupts
from lock acquisition.
Store a weak reference to stream readerfor breaking strong references
It breaks the strong reference loop between reader and protocol and allows to detect and close the socket if the stream is deleted (garbage collected)
It is unused.
<!--
Thanks for your contribution!
Please read this comment in its entirety. It's quite important.
# Pull Request title
It should be in the following format:
```
bpo-NNNN: Summary of the changes made
```
Where: bpo-NNNN refers to the issue number in the https://bugs.python.org.
Most PRs will require an issue number. Trivial changes, like fixing a typo, do not need an issue.
# Backport Pull Request title
If this is a backport PR (PR made against branches other than `master`),
please ensure that the PR title is in the following format:
```
[X.Y] <title from the original PR> (GH-NNNN)
```
Where: [X.Y] is the branch name, e.g. [3.6].
GH-NNNN refers to the PR number from `master`.
-->
Address a C undefined behavior signed integer overflow issue in set object table resizing. Our -fwrapv compiler flag and practical reasons why sets are unlikely to get this large should mean this was never an issue but it was incorrect code that generates code analysis warnings.
<!-- issue-number: [bpo-1621](https://www.bugs.python.org/issue1621) -->
https://bugs.python.org/issue1621
<!-- /issue-number -->
Followup to 90fc8980bb.
<!--
Thanks for your contribution!
Please read this comment in its entirety. It's quite important.
# Pull Request title
It should be in the following format:
```
bpo-NNNN: Summary of the changes made
```
Where: bpo-NNNN refers to the issue number in the https://bugs.python.org.
Most PRs will require an issue number. Trivial changes, like fixing a typo, do not need an issue.
# Backport Pull Request title
If this is a backport PR (PR made against branches other than `master`),
please ensure that the PR title is in the following format:
```
[X.Y] <title from the original PR> (GH-NNNN)
```
Where: [X.Y] is the branch name, e.g. [3.6].
GH-NNNN refers to the PR number from `master`.
-->
GCC complains:
Python/pylifecycle.c: In function ‘_Py_InitializeFromConfig’:
Python/pylifecycle.c:900:13: warning: ‘interp’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
err = _Py_InitializeMainInterpreter(interp, &main_config);
~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This seems spurious since &interp is passed to _Py_InitializeCore. Anyway, we
can easily initialize to quiet the warning.
Although the kernel accepts any negative value for timeout, the
documented value to block indefinitely is -1.
This commit also makes the code similar to select.poll.poll().
Ned Deily
Benjamin Peterson
Eric V. Smith
Gregory P. Smith
Carol Willing
Tony Flury
Alexey Izbyshev
Andrew Svetlov
Oren Milman
Ethan Furman
Bumsik Kim
Raymond Hettinger
orlnub123
Sergey Fedoseev
Cheryl Sabella
Yury Selivanov
Victor Stinner
Max Bélanger
Tal Einat
guoci
Danish Prakash
Bram
Steve Dower
wim glenn
Berker Peksag