from unbuffered (0) to buffering (-1) to match the behavior existing code
expects and match the behavior of the subprocess module in Python 2 to avoid
introducing hard to track down bugs.
from unbuffered (0) to buffering (-1) to match the behavior existing code
expects and match the behavior of the subprocess module in Python 2 to avoid
introducing hard to track down bugs.
from unbuffered (0) to buffering (-1) to match the behavior existing code
expects and match the behavior of the subprocess module in Python 2 to avoid
introducing hard to track down bugs.
tests that depend on filling up an OS pipe so that they work properly
on systems configured with large pipe buffers.
Also a subprocess docstring update that i forgot was in my client when
i did the original 3.3 commit... easier to just leave that in here
with this one than go back and undo/redo.
As stated in PEP 11, 3.4 removes code on Windows platforms where
COMSPEC points to command.com. The w9xpopen project in Visual Studio
was added to support that case, and there was a special case in subprocess
to cover that situation. This change removes the w9xpopen project from
the Visual Studio solution and removes any references to the w9xpopen
executable.
child subprocess.PIPE parent file descriptors on child error prior to
exec().
This would lead to race conditions in multithreaded programs where
another thread opened a file reusing the fd which was then closed out
from beneath it by the errant second close.
child subprocess.PIPE parent file descriptors on child error prior to
exec().
This would lead to race conditions in multithreaded programs where
another thread opened a file reusing the fd which was then closed out
from beneath it by the errant second close.
child subprocess.PIPE parent file descriptors on child error prior to
exec().
This would lead to race conditions in multithreaded programs where
another thread opened a file reusing the fd which was then closed out
from beneath it by the errant second close.
all together and just include the repr of the data in the exception
itself instead of the useless string "Unknown".
This code path is unlikely to even be possible to take given the
nature of the pipe it gets subprocess data from.
all together and just include the repr of the data in the exception
itself instead of the useless string "Unknown".
This code path is unlikely to even be possible to take given the
nature of the pipe it gets subprocess data from.
all together and just include the repr of the data in the exception
itself instead of the useless string "Unknown".
This code path is unlikely to even be possible to take given the
nature of the pipe it gets subprocess data from.