From fad8b5674c66d9e00bb788e30adddb0c256c787b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oz N Tiram Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:55:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] bpo-39348: Fix code highlight for the SOCK_NONBLOCK example (GH-18018) The previous double colon was wrongly place directly after Therefore. Which produced a block without syntax highlighting. This fixes it by separating the double colon from the text. As a result, sphinx now properly highlights the python code. https://bugs.python.org/issue39348 --- Doc/library/socket.rst | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Doc/library/socket.rst b/Doc/library/socket.rst index 2d7ca33f292..2cc946c519d 100755 --- a/Doc/library/socket.rst +++ b/Doc/library/socket.rst @@ -565,7 +565,9 @@ The following functions all create :ref:`socket objects `. When :const:`SOCK_NONBLOCK` or :const:`SOCK_CLOEXEC` bit flags are applied to *type* they are cleared, and :attr:`socket.type` will not reflect them. They are still passed - to the underlying system `socket()` call. Therefore:: + to the underlying system `socket()` call. Therefore, + + :: sock = socket.socket( socket.AF_INET,