Mirror
/
cpython
mirror of https://github.com/python/cpython
4
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

gh-71141: Add note on rejecting "leading-dot" syntax for with statements (#96928) 

Co-authored-by: Daniël van Noord <13665637+DanielNoord@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Stanley 2022-09-20 21:16:39 -07:00 committed by GitHub
parent 57463d43dc
commit e5ab0b6aa6
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
Doc/faq/design.rst
View File

@ -703,6 +703,10 @@ This also has the side-effect of increasing execution speed because name
bindings are resolved at run-time in Python, and the second version only needs bindings are resolved at run-time in Python, and the second version only needs
to perform the resolution once. to perform the resolution once.
Similar proposals that would introduce syntax to further reduce code volume,
such as using a 'leading dot', have been rejected in favour of explicitness (see
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2016-May/040070.html).
Why don't generators support the with statement? Why don't generators support the with statement?
------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------