Improve asyncio-dev 'Concurrency and Multithreading' docs (GH-20882)

I added some information to the `Concurrency and Multithreading` section of the `Developing with asyncio` guide. 

This is all information that would have helped me when I started using asyncio. I incorrectly assumed that `loop.call_soon_threadsafe()` and `run_coroutine_threadsafe()` could be called from a thread in a process separate from the one that the event loop is running in. Explicitly stating that this will not work will probably help some people starting out with asyncio in the future.

I also added references to some other functions that can be used for inter-process communication without blocking the event loop. The section already mentions running blocking code in a ThreadPoolExecutor, but I think listing these other options in this section will also be helpful.
This commit is contained in:
Roger Iyengar 2020-08-29 19:47:38 -04:00 committed by GitHub
parent 27de28607a
commit c68c5af2dc
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -107,6 +107,16 @@ The :meth:`loop.run_in_executor` method can be used with a
blocking code in a different OS thread without blocking the OS thread
that the event loop runs in.
There is currently no way to schedule coroutines or callbacks directly
from a different process (such as one started with
:mod:`multiprocessing`). The :ref:`Event Loop Methods <asyncio-event-loop>`
section lists APIs that can read from pipes and watch file descriptors
without blocking the event loop. In addition, asyncio's
:ref:`Subprocess <asyncio-subprocess>` APIs provide a way to start a
process and communicate with it from the event loop. Lastly, the
aforementioned :meth:`loop.run_in_executor` method can also be used
with a :class:`concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor` to execute
code in a different process.
.. _asyncio-handle-blocking: