fix whitespace style (inconsistent with the rest of the docs)

This commit is contained in:
Fred Drake 2004-01-27 21:08:04 +00:00
parent fb5a4e33fb
commit bd12b181c8
1 changed files with 17 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ parser.add_option("-q", "--quiet",
action="store_false", dest="verbose", default=True,
help="don't print status messages to stdout")
(options, args) = parser.parse_args()
options, args = parser.parse_args()
\end{verbatim}
With these few lines of code, users of your script can now do the
@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ parse it:
\begin{verbatim}
args = ["-f", "foo.txt"]
(options, args) = parser.parse_args(args)
options, args = parser.parse_args(args)
\end{verbatim}
(Note that if you don't pass an argument list to
@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ argument right up against the option, since \programopt{-n42} (one
argument) is equivalent to \programopt{-n 42} (two arguments).
\begin{verbatim}
(options, args) = parser.parse_args(["-n42"])
options, args = parser.parse_args(["-n42"])
print options.num
\end{verbatim}
@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ def main():
parser.add_option("-q", "--quiet",
action="store_false", dest="verbose")
(options, args) = parser.parse_args()
options, args = parser.parse_args()
if len(args) != 1:
parser.error("incorrect number of arguments")
@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ if you supply \var{callback_args} and/or \var{callback_kwargs} when
you define your callback option), the minimal callback function is:
\begin{verbatim}
def my_callback (option, opt, value, parser):
def my_callback(option, opt, value, parser):
pass
\end{verbatim}
@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ Here's an example of a callback option that takes no arguments, and
simply records that the option was seen:
\begin{verbatim}
def record_foo_seen (option, opt, value, parser):
def record_foo_seen(option, opt, value, parser):
parser.saw_foo = 1
parser.add_option("--foo", action="callback", callback=record_foo_seen)
@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ slightly more interesting example: record the fact that
in the command-line.
\begin{verbatim}
def check_order (option, opt, value, parser):
def check_order(option, opt, value, parser):
if parser.values.b:
raise OptionValueError("can't use -a after -b")
parser.values.a = 1
@ -1318,7 +1318,7 @@ a bit of work: the error message and the flag that it sets must be
generalized.
\begin{verbatim}
def check_order (option, opt, value, parser):
def check_order(option, opt, value, parser):
if parser.values.b:
raise OptionValueError("can't use %s after -b" % opt)
setattr(parser.values, option.dest, 1)
@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ you have options that should not be called when the moon is full, all
you have to do is this:
\begin{verbatim}
def check_moon (option, opt, value, parser):
def check_moon(option, opt, value, parser):
if is_full_moon():
raise OptionValueError("%s option invalid when moon full" % opt)
setattr(parser.values, option.dest, 1)
@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ argument that must be convertible to that type; if you further define
Here's an example that just emulates the standard ``store'' action:
\begin{verbatim}
def store_value (option, opt, value, parser):
def store_value(option, opt, value, parser):
setattr(parser.values, option.dest, value)
...
parser.add_option("--foo",
@ -1405,7 +1405,7 @@ Nevertheless, here's a stab at a callback for an option with variable
arguments:
\begin{verbatim}
def varargs (option, opt, value, parser):
def varargs(option, opt, value, parser):
assert value is None
done = 0
value = []
@ -1463,8 +1463,8 @@ type-checking functions. A type-checking function has the following
signature:
\begin{verbatim}
def check_foo (option : Option, opt : string, value : string)
-> foo
def check_foo(option : Option, opt : string, value : string)
-> foo
\end{verbatim}
You can name it whatever you like, and make it return any type you
@ -1498,7 +1498,7 @@ later (in the \member{TYPE_CHECKER} class attribute of your
\class{Option} subclass):
\begin{verbatim}
def check_complex (option, opt, value):
def check_complex(option, opt, value):
try:
return complex(value)
except ValueError:
@ -1509,7 +1509,7 @@ def check_complex (option, opt, value):
Finally, the \class{Option} subclass:
\begin{verbatim}
class MyOption (Option):
class MyOption(Option):
TYPES = Option.TYPES + ("complex",)
TYPE_CHECKER = copy(Option.TYPE_CHECKER)
TYPE_CHECKER["complex"] = check_complex
@ -1600,13 +1600,13 @@ would result in a list:
Again we define a subclass of \class{Option}:
\begin{verbatim}
class MyOption (Option):
class MyOption(Option):
ACTIONS = Option.ACTIONS + ("extend",)
STORE_ACTIONS = Option.STORE_ACTIONS + ("extend",)
TYPED_ACTIONS = Option.TYPED_ACTIONS + ("extend",)
def take_action (self, action, dest, opt, value, values, parser):
def take_action(self, action, dest, opt, value, values, parser):
if action == "extend":
lvalue = value.split(",")
values.ensure_value(dest, []).extend(lvalue)