From adf172339cd8299d32cf8022f769d82603bb31e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Armin Rigo Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:25:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Modify the segfaulting example to show why r53997 is not a solution to it. --- Lib/test/crashers/modify_dict_attr.py | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Lib/test/crashers/modify_dict_attr.py diff --git a/Lib/test/crashers/modify_dict_attr.py b/Lib/test/crashers/modify_dict_attr.py new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..11c672106ab --- /dev/null +++ b/Lib/test/crashers/modify_dict_attr.py @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ + +# http://python.org/sf/1303614 + +class Y(object): + pass + +class type_with_modifiable_dict(type, Y): + pass + +class MyClass(object): + """This class has its __dict__ attribute indirectly + exposed via the __dict__ getter/setter of Y. + """ + __metaclass__ = type_with_modifiable_dict + + +if __name__ == '__main__': + dictattr = Y.__dict__['__dict__'] + dictattr.__delete__(MyClass) # if we set tp_dict to NULL, + print MyClass # doing anything with MyClass segfaults