Merged revisions 83400 via svnmerge from

svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/branches/py3k

........
  r83400 | mark.dickinson | 2010-08-01 11:41:49 +0100 (Sun, 01 Aug 2010) | 7 lines

  Issue #9416: Fix some issues with complex formatting where the
  output with no type specifier failed to match the str output:

    - format(complex(-0.0, 2.0), '-') omitted the real part from the output,
    - format(complex(0.0, 2.0), '-') included a sign and parentheses.
........
This commit is contained in:
Mark Dickinson 2010-08-01 10:45:15 +00:00
parent 1f05e2e9ba
commit aad57bd1bb
3 changed files with 24 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -558,6 +558,16 @@ class ComplexTest(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(format(z, '-'), str(z))
self.assertEqual(format(z, '<'), str(z))
self.assertEqual(format(z, '10'), str(z))
z = complex(0.0, 3.0)
self.assertEqual(format(z, ''), str(z))
self.assertEqual(format(z, '-'), str(z))
self.assertEqual(format(z, '<'), str(z))
self.assertEqual(format(z, '2'), str(z))
z = complex(-0.0, 2.0)
self.assertEqual(format(z, ''), str(z))
self.assertEqual(format(z, '-'), str(z))
self.assertEqual(format(z, '<'), str(z))
self.assertEqual(format(z, '3'), str(z))
self.assertEqual(format(1+3j, 'g'), '1+3j')
self.assertEqual(format(3j, 'g'), '0+3j')

View File

@ -12,6 +12,12 @@ What's New in Python 2.7.1?
Core and Builtins
-----------------
- Issue #9416: Fix some issues with complex formatting where the
output with no type specifier failed to match the str output:
- format(complex(-0.0, 2.0), '-') omitted the real part from the output,
- format(complex(0.0, 2.0), '-') included a sign and parentheses.
- Issue #7616: Fix copying of overlapping memoryview slices with the Intel
compiler.

View File

@ -1144,9 +1144,10 @@ format_complex_internal(PyObject *value,
/* Omitted type specifier. Should be like str(self). */
type = 'g';
default_precision = PyFloat_STR_PRECISION;
add_parens = 1;
if (re == 0.0)
if (re == 0.0 && copysign(1.0, re) == 1.0)
skip_re = 1;
else
add_parens = 1;
}
if (type == 'n')
@ -1231,8 +1232,11 @@ format_complex_internal(PyObject *value,
n_re_digits, n_re_remainder,
re_has_decimal, &locale, &tmp_format);
/* Same formatting, but always include a sign. */
tmp_format.sign = '+';
/* Same formatting, but always include a sign, unless the real part is
* going to be omitted, in which case we use whatever sign convention was
* requested by the original format. */
if (!skip_re)
tmp_format.sign = '+';
n_im_total = calc_number_widths(&im_spec, 0, im_sign_char, p_im,
n_im_digits, n_im_remainder,
im_has_decimal, &locale, &tmp_format);