[3.13] gh-87106: Fix inspect.signature.bind() handling of positional-only arguments with **kwargs (GH-103404) (#118985)

(cherry picked from commit 9c15202441)

Co-authored-by: Jacob Walls <jacobtylerwalls@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Miss Islington (bot) 2024-05-13 10:35:31 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent 9d2c10bee3
commit a8ea9669aa
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
3 changed files with 39 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -3106,6 +3106,8 @@ class Signature:
parameters_ex = ()
arg_vals = iter(args)
pos_only_param_in_kwargs = []
while True:
# Let's iterate through the positional arguments and corresponding
# parameters
@ -3126,10 +3128,10 @@ class Signature:
break
elif param.name in kwargs:
if param.kind == _POSITIONAL_ONLY:
msg = '{arg!r} parameter is positional only, ' \
'but was passed as a keyword'
msg = msg.format(arg=param.name)
raise TypeError(msg) from None
# Raise a TypeError once we are sure there is no
# **kwargs param later.
pos_only_param_in_kwargs.append(param)
continue
parameters_ex = (param,)
break
elif (param.kind == _VAR_KEYWORD or
@ -3211,20 +3213,22 @@ class Signature:
format(arg=param_name)) from None
else:
if param.kind == _POSITIONAL_ONLY:
# This should never happen in case of a properly built
# Signature object (but let's have this check here
# to ensure correct behaviour just in case)
raise TypeError('{arg!r} parameter is positional only, '
'but was passed as a keyword'. \
format(arg=param.name))
arguments[param_name] = arg_val
if kwargs:
if kwargs_param is not None:
# Process our '**kwargs'-like parameter
arguments[kwargs_param.name] = kwargs
elif pos_only_param_in_kwargs:
raise TypeError(
'got some positional-only arguments passed as '
'keyword arguments: {arg!r}'.format(
arg=', '.join(
param.name
for param in pos_only_param_in_kwargs
),
),
)
else:
raise TypeError(
'got an unexpected keyword argument {arg!r}'.format(

View File

@ -5089,15 +5089,30 @@ class TestSignatureBind(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(self.call(test, 1, 2, foo=4, bar=5),
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, {}))
with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, "but was passed as a keyword"):
self.call(test, 1, 2, foo=4, bar=5, c_po=10)
self.assertEqual(self.call(test, 1, 2, foo=4, bar=5, c_po=10),
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, {'c_po': 10}))
with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, "parameter is positional only"):
self.call(test, 1, 2, c_po=4)
self.assertEqual(self.call(test, 1, 2, 30, c_po=31, foo=4, bar=5),
(1, 2, 30, 4, 5, {'c_po': 31}))
with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, "parameter is positional only"):
self.assertEqual(self.call(test, 1, 2, 30, foo=4, bar=5, c_po=31),
(1, 2, 30, 4, 5, {'c_po': 31}))
self.assertEqual(self.call(test, 1, 2, c_po=4),
(1, 2, 3, 42, 50, {'c_po': 4}))
with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, "missing 2 required positional arguments"):
self.call(test, a_po=1, b_po=2)
def without_var_kwargs(c_po=3, d_po=4, /):
return c_po, d_po
with self.assertRaisesRegex(
TypeError,
"positional-only arguments passed as keyword arguments: 'c_po, d_po'",
):
self.call(without_var_kwargs, c_po=33, d_po=44)
def test_signature_bind_with_self_arg(self):
# Issue #17071: one of the parameters is named "self
def test(a, self, b):

View File

@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
Fixed handling in :meth:`inspect.signature.bind` of keyword arguments having
the same name as positional-only arguments when a variadic keyword argument
(e.g. ``**kwargs``) is present.