From 6daf42b28e1c6d5f0c1a6350cfcc382789e11293 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: VMan Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 13:15:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [doc] Improve grammar/fix missing word (GH-102060) --- Doc/bugs.rst | 2 +- Doc/howto/logging-cookbook.rst | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Doc/bugs.rst b/Doc/bugs.rst index 4f30ef19ee4..d98192b3696 100644 --- a/Doc/bugs.rst +++ b/Doc/bugs.rst @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ Click on the "New issue" button in the top bar to report a new issue. The submission form has two fields, "Title" and "Comment". For the "Title" field, enter a *very* short description of the problem; -less than ten words is good. +fewer than ten words is good. In the "Comment" field, describe the problem in detail, including what you expected to happen and what did happen. Be sure to include whether any diff --git a/Doc/howto/logging-cookbook.rst b/Doc/howto/logging-cookbook.rst index 7661249ad52..1a0afb6940d 100644 --- a/Doc/howto/logging-cookbook.rst +++ b/Doc/howto/logging-cookbook.rst @@ -2538,7 +2538,7 @@ should be logged, or the ``extra`` keyword parameter to indicate additional contextual information to be added to the log). So you cannot directly make logging calls using :meth:`str.format` or :class:`string.Template` syntax, because internally the logging package uses %-formatting to merge the format -string and the variable arguments. There would no changing this while preserving +string and the variable arguments. There would be no changing this while preserving backward compatibility, since all logging calls which are out there in existing code will be using %-format strings.