mirror of https://github.com/python/cpython
gh-119786: move interpreter doc from devguide to InternalDocs (#125715)
This commit is contained in:
parent
9b0bfba2a2
commit
695814c6e9
|
@ -11,19 +11,32 @@ The core dev team attempts to keep this documentation up to date. If
|
|||
it is not, please report that through the
|
||||
[issue tracker](https://github.com/python/cpython/issues).
|
||||
|
||||
Index:
|
||||
-----
|
||||
|
||||
[Guide to the parser](parser.md)
|
||||
Compiling Python Source Code
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[Compiler Design](compiler.md)
|
||||
- [Guide to the parser](parser.md)
|
||||
|
||||
[Frames](frames.md)
|
||||
- [Compiler Design](compiler.md)
|
||||
|
||||
[Adaptive Instruction Families](adaptive.md)
|
||||
Runtime Objects
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
[The Source Code Locations Table](locations.md)
|
||||
- [Code Objects (coming soon)](code_objects.md)
|
||||
|
||||
[Garbage collector design](garbage_collector.md)
|
||||
- [The Source Code Locations Table](locations.md)
|
||||
|
||||
[Exception Handling](exception_handling.md)
|
||||
- [Generators (coming soon)](generators.md)
|
||||
|
||||
- [Frames](frames.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Program Execution
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
- [The Interpreter](interpreter.md)
|
||||
|
||||
- [Adaptive Instruction Families](adaptive.md)
|
||||
|
||||
- [Garbage Collector Design](garbage_collector.md)
|
||||
|
||||
- [Exception Handling](exception_handling.md)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
|
|||
|
||||
Code objects
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
Coming soon.
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||
|
||||
Generators
|
||||
==========
|
||||
|
||||
Coming soon.
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
- Generators, async functions, async generators, and ``yield from`` (next, send, throw, close; and await; and how this code breaks the interpreter abstraction)
|
||||
-->
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,364 @@
|
|||
|
||||
The bytecode interpreter
|
||||
========================
|
||||
|
||||
Overview
|
||||
--------
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes the workings and implementation of the bytecode
|
||||
interpreter, the part of python that executes compiled Python code. Its
|
||||
entry point is in [Python/ceval.c](../Python/ceval.c).
|
||||
|
||||
At a high level, the interpreter consists of a loop that iterates over the
|
||||
bytecode instructions, executing each of them via a switch statement that
|
||||
has a case implementing each opcode. This switch statement is generated
|
||||
from the instruction definitions in [Python/bytecodes.c](../Python/bytecodes.c)
|
||||
which are written in [a DSL](../Tools/cases_generator/interpreter_definition.md)
|
||||
developed for this purpose.
|
||||
|
||||
Recall that the [Python Compiler](compiler.md) produces a [`CodeObject`](code_object.md),
|
||||
which contains the bytecode instructions along with static data that is required to execute them,
|
||||
such as the consts list, variable names,
|
||||
[exception table](exception_handling.md#format-of-the-exception-table), and so on.
|
||||
|
||||
When the interpreter's
|
||||
[`PyEval_EvalCode()`](https://docs.python.org/3.14/c-api/veryhigh.html#c.PyEval_EvalCode)
|
||||
function is called to execute a `CodeObject`, it constructs a [`Frame`](frames.md) and calls
|
||||
[`_PyEval_EvalFrame()`](https://docs.python.org/3.14/c-api/veryhigh.html#c.PyEval_EvalCode)
|
||||
to execute the code object in this frame. The frame hold the dynamic state of the
|
||||
`CodeObject`'s execution, including the instruction pointer, the globals and builtins.
|
||||
It also has a reference to the `CodeObject` itself.
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to the frame, `_PyEval_EvalFrame()` also receives a
|
||||
[`Thread State`](https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/init.html#c.PyThreadState)
|
||||
object, `tstate`, which includes things like the exception state and the
|
||||
recursion depth. The thread state also provides access to the per-interpreter
|
||||
state (`tstate->interp`), which has a pointer to the per-runtime (that is,
|
||||
truly global) state (`tstate->interp->runtime`).
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, `_PyEval_EvalFrame()` receives an integer argument `throwflag`
|
||||
which, when nonzero, indicates that the interpreter should just raise the current exception
|
||||
(this is used in the implementation of
|
||||
[`gen.throw`](https://docs.python.org/3.14/reference/expressions.html#generator.throw).
|
||||
|
||||
By default, [`_PyEval_EvalFrame()`](https://docs.python.org/3.14/c-api/veryhigh.html#c.PyEval_EvalCode)
|
||||
simply calls [`_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault()`] to execute the frame. However, as per
|
||||
[`PEP 523`](https://peps.python.org/pep-0523/) this is configurable by setting
|
||||
`interp->eval_frame`. In the following, we describe the default function,
|
||||
`_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault()`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Instruction decoding
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The first task of the interpreter is to decode the bytecode instructions.
|
||||
Bytecode is stored as an array of 16-bit code units (`_Py_CODEUNIT`).
|
||||
Each code unit contains an 8-bit `opcode` and an 8-bit argument (`oparg`), both unsigned.
|
||||
In order to make the bytecode format independent of the machine byte order when stored on disk,
|
||||
`opcode` is always the first byte and `oparg` is always the second byte.
|
||||
Macros are used to extract the `opcode` and `oparg` from a code unit
|
||||
(`_Py_OPCODE(word)` and `_Py_OPARG(word)`).
|
||||
Some instructions (for example, `NOP` or `POP_TOP`) have no argument -- in this case
|
||||
we ignore `oparg`.
|
||||
|
||||
A simplified version of the interpreter's main loop looks like this:
|
||||
|
||||
```c
|
||||
_Py_CODEUNIT *first_instr = code->co_code_adaptive;
|
||||
_Py_CODEUNIT *next_instr = first_instr;
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
_Py_CODEUNIT word = *next_instr++;
|
||||
unsigned char opcode = _Py_OPCODE(word);
|
||||
unsigned int oparg = _Py_OPARG(word);
|
||||
switch (opcode) {
|
||||
// ... A case for each opcode ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This loop iterates over the instructions, decoding each into its `opcode`
|
||||
and `oparg`, and then executes the switch case that implements this `opcode`.
|
||||
|
||||
The instruction format supports 256 different opcodes, which is sufficient.
|
||||
However, it also limits `oparg` to 8-bit values, which is too restrictive.
|
||||
To overcome this, the `EXTENDED_ARG` opcode allows us to prefix any instruction
|
||||
with one or more additional data bytes, which combine into a larger oparg.
|
||||
For example, this sequence of code units:
|
||||
|
||||
EXTENDED_ARG 1
|
||||
EXTENDED_ARG 0
|
||||
LOAD_CONST 2
|
||||
|
||||
would set `opcode` to `LOAD_CONST` and `oparg` to `65538` (that is, `0x1_00_02`).
|
||||
The compiler should limit itself to at most three `EXTENDED_ARG` prefixes, to allow the
|
||||
resulting `oparg` to fit in 32 bits, but the interpreter does not check this.
|
||||
|
||||
In the following, a `code unit` is always two bytes, while an `instruction` is a
|
||||
sequence of code units consisting of zero to three `EXTENDED_ARG` opcodes followed by
|
||||
a primary opcode.
|
||||
|
||||
The following loop, to be inserted just above the `switch` statement, will make the above
|
||||
snippet decode a complete instruction:
|
||||
|
||||
```c
|
||||
while (opcode == EXTENDED_ARG) {
|
||||
word = *next_instr++;
|
||||
opcode = _Py_OPCODE(word);
|
||||
oparg = (oparg << 8) | _Py_OPARG(word);
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For various reasons we'll get to later (mostly efficiency, given that `EXTENDED_ARG`
|
||||
is rare) the actual code is different.
|
||||
|
||||
Jumps
|
||||
=====
|
||||
|
||||
Note that when the `switch` statement is reached, `next_instr` (the "instruction offset")
|
||||
already points to the next instruction.
|
||||
Thus, jump instructions can be implemented by manipulating `next_instr`:
|
||||
|
||||
- A jump forward (`JUMP_FORWARD`) sets `next_instr += oparg`.
|
||||
- A jump backward sets `next_instr -= oparg`.
|
||||
|
||||
Inline cache entries
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
Some (specialized or specializable) instructions have an associated "inline cache".
|
||||
The inline cache consists of one or more two-byte entries included in the bytecode
|
||||
array as additional words following the `opcode`/`oparg` pair.
|
||||
The size of the inline cache for a particular instruction is fixed by its `opcode`.
|
||||
Moreover, the inline cache size for all instructions in a
|
||||
[family of specialized/specializable instructions](adaptive.md)
|
||||
(for example, `LOAD_ATTR`, `LOAD_ATTR_SLOT`, `LOAD_ATTR_MODULE`) must all be
|
||||
the same. Cache entries are reserved by the compiler and initialized with zeros.
|
||||
Although they are represented by code units, cache entries do not conform to the
|
||||
`opcode` / `oparg` format.
|
||||
|
||||
If an instruction has an inline cache, the layout of its cache is described by
|
||||
a `struct` definition in (`pycore_code.h`)[../Include/internal/pycore_code.h].
|
||||
This allows us to access the cache by casting `next_instr` to a pointer to this `struct`.
|
||||
The size of such a `struct` must be independent of the machine architecture, word size
|
||||
and alignment requirements. For a 32-bit field, the `struct` should use `_Py_CODEUNIT field[2]`.
|
||||
|
||||
The instruction implementation is responsible for advancing `next_instr` past the inline cache.
|
||||
For example, if an instruction's inline cache is four bytes (that is, two code units) in size,
|
||||
the code for the instruction must contain `next_instr += 2;`.
|
||||
This is equivalent to a relative forward jump by that many code units.
|
||||
(In the interpreter definition DSL, this is coded as `JUMPBY(n)`, where `n` is the number
|
||||
of code units to jump, typically given as a named constant.)
|
||||
|
||||
Serializing non-zero cache entries would present a problem because the serialization
|
||||
(:mod:`marshal`) format must be independent of the machine byte order.
|
||||
|
||||
More information about the use of inline caches can be found in
|
||||
[PEP 659](https://peps.python.org/pep-0659/#ancillary-data).
|
||||
|
||||
The evaluation stack
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Most instructions read or write some data in the form of object references (`PyObject *`).
|
||||
The CPython bytecode interpreter is a stack machine, meaning that its instructions operate
|
||||
by pushing data onto and popping it off the stack.
|
||||
The stack is forms part of the frame for the code object. Its maximum depth is calculated
|
||||
by the compiler and stored in the `co_stacksize` field of the code object, so that the
|
||||
stack can be pre-allocated is a contiguous array of `PyObject*` pointers, when the frame
|
||||
is created.
|
||||
|
||||
The stack effects of each instruction are also exposed through the
|
||||
[opcode metadata](../Include/internal/pycore_opcode_metadata.h) through two
|
||||
functions that report how many stack elements the instructions consumes,
|
||||
and how many it produces (`_PyOpcode_num_popped` and `_PyOpcode_num_pushed`).
|
||||
For example, the `BINARY_OP` instruction pops two objects from the stack and pushes the
|
||||
result back onto the stack.
|
||||
|
||||
The stack grows up in memory; the operation `PUSH(x)` is equivalent to `*stack_pointer++ = x`,
|
||||
whereas `x = POP()` means `x = *--stack_pointer`.
|
||||
Overflow and underflow checks are active in debug mode, but are otherwise optimized away.
|
||||
|
||||
At any point during execution, the stack level is knowable based on the instruction pointer
|
||||
alone, and some properties of each item on the stack are also known.
|
||||
In particular, only a few instructions may push a `NULL` onto the stack, and the positions
|
||||
that may be `NULL` are known.
|
||||
A few other instructions (`GET_ITER`, `FOR_ITER`) push or pop an object that is known to
|
||||
be an iterator.
|
||||
|
||||
Instruction sequences that do not allow statically knowing the stack depth are deemed illegal;
|
||||
the bytecode compiler never generates such sequences.
|
||||
For example, the following sequence is illegal, because it keeps pushing items on the stack:
|
||||
|
||||
LOAD_FAST 0
|
||||
JUMP_BACKWARD 2
|
||||
|
||||
> [!NOTE]
|
||||
> Do not confuse the evaluation stack with the call stack, which is used to implement calling
|
||||
> and returning from functions.
|
||||
|
||||
Error handling
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
When the implementation of an opcode raises an exception, it jumps to the
|
||||
`exception_unwind` label in [Python/ceval.c](../Python/ceval.c).
|
||||
The exception is then handled as described in the
|
||||
[`exception handling documentation`](exception_handling.md#handling-exceptions).
|
||||
|
||||
Python-to-Python calls
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The `_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault()` function is recursive, because sometimes
|
||||
the interpreter calls some C function that calls back into the interpreter.
|
||||
In 3.10 and before, this was the case even when a Python function called
|
||||
another Python function:
|
||||
The `CALL` opcode would call the `tp_call` dispatch function of the
|
||||
callee, which would extract the code object, create a new frame for the call
|
||||
stack, and then call back into the interpreter. This approach is very general
|
||||
but consumes several C stack frames for each nested Python call, thereby
|
||||
increasing the risk of an (unrecoverable) C stack overflow.
|
||||
|
||||
Since 3.11, the `CALL` instruction special-cases function objects to "inline"
|
||||
the call. When a call gets inlined, a new frame gets pushed onto the call
|
||||
stack and the interpreter "jumps" to the start of the callee's bytecode.
|
||||
When an inlined callee executes a `RETURN_VALUE` instruction, the frame is
|
||||
popped off the call stack and the interpreter returns to its caller,
|
||||
by popping a frame off the call stack and "jumping" to the return address.
|
||||
There is a flag in the frame (`frame->is_entry`) that indicates whether
|
||||
the frame was inlined (set if it wasn't).
|
||||
If `RETURN_VALUE` finds this flag set, it performs the usual cleanup and
|
||||
returns from `_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault()` altogether, to a C caller.
|
||||
|
||||
A similar check is performed when an unhandled exception occurs.
|
||||
|
||||
The call stack
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
Up through 3.10, the call stack was implemented as a singly-linked list of
|
||||
[frame objects](frames.md). This was expensive because each call would require a
|
||||
heap allocation for the stack frame.
|
||||
|
||||
Since 3.11, frames are no longer fully-fledged objects. Instead, a leaner internal
|
||||
`_PyInterpreterFrame` structure is used, which is allocated using a custom allocator
|
||||
function (`_PyThreadState_BumpFramePointer()`), which allocates and initializes a
|
||||
frame structure. Usually a frame allocation is just a pointer bump, which improves
|
||||
memory locality.
|
||||
|
||||
Sometimes an actual `PyFrameObject` is needed, such as when Python code calls
|
||||
`sys._getframe()` or an extension module calls
|
||||
[`PyEval_GetFrame()`](https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/reflection.html#c.PyEval_GetFrame).
|
||||
In this case we allocate a proper `PyFrameObject` and initialize it from the
|
||||
`_PyInterpreterFrame`.
|
||||
|
||||
Things get more complicated when generators are involved, since those do not
|
||||
follow the push/pop model. This includes async functions, which are based on
|
||||
the same mechanism. A generator object has space for a `_PyInterpreterFrame`
|
||||
structure, including the variable-size part (used for locals and the eval stack).
|
||||
When a generator (or async) function is first called, a special opcode
|
||||
`RETURN_GENERATOR` is executed, which is responsible for creating the
|
||||
generator object. The generator object's `_PyInterpreterFrame` is initialized
|
||||
with a copy of the current stack frame. The current stack frame is then popped
|
||||
off the frame stack and the generator object is returned.
|
||||
(Details differ depending on the `is_entry` flag.)
|
||||
When the generator is resumed, the interpreter pushes its `_PyInterpreterFrame`
|
||||
onto the frame stack and resumes execution.
|
||||
See also the [generators](generators.md) section.
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
|
||||
All sorts of variables
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The bytecode compiler determines the scope in which each variable name is defined,
|
||||
and generates instructions accordingly. For example, loading a local variable
|
||||
onto the stack is done using `LOAD_FAST`, while loading a global is done using
|
||||
`LOAD_GLOBAL`.
|
||||
The key types of variables are:
|
||||
|
||||
- fast locals: used in functions
|
||||
- (slow or regular) locals: used in classes and at the top level
|
||||
- globals and builtins: the compiler cannot distinguish between globals and
|
||||
builtins (though at runtime, the specializing interpreter can)
|
||||
- cells: used for nonlocal references
|
||||
|
||||
(TODO: Write the rest of this section. Alas, the author got distracted and won't have time to continue this for a while.)
|
||||
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
|
||||
Other topics
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
(TODO: Each of the following probably deserves its own section.)
|
||||
|
||||
- co_consts, co_names, co_varnames, and their ilk
|
||||
- How calls work (how args are transferred, return, exceptions)
|
||||
- Eval breaker (interrupts, GIL)
|
||||
- Tracing
|
||||
- Setting the current lineno (debugger-induced jumps)
|
||||
- Specialization, inline caches etc.
|
||||
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
Introducing a new bytecode instruction
|
||||
--------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
It is occasionally necessary to add a new opcode in order to implement
|
||||
a new feature or change the way that existing features are compiled.
|
||||
This section describes the changes required to do this.
|
||||
|
||||
First, you must choose a name for the bytecode, implement it in
|
||||
[`Python/bytecodes.c`](../Python/bytecodes.c) and add a documentation
|
||||
entry in [`Doc/library/dis.rst`](../Doc/library/dis.rst).
|
||||
Then run `make regen-cases` to assign a number for it (see
|
||||
[`Include/opcode_ids.h`](../Include/opcode_ids.h)) and regenerate a
|
||||
number of files with the actual implementation of the bytecode in
|
||||
[`Python/generated_cases.c.h`](../Python/generated_cases.c.h) and
|
||||
metadata about it in additional files.
|
||||
|
||||
With a new bytecode you must also change what is called the "magic number" for
|
||||
.pyc files: bump the value of the variable `MAGIC_NUMBER` in
|
||||
[`Lib/importlib/_bootstrap_external.py`](../Lib/importlib/_bootstrap_external.py).
|
||||
Changing this number will lead to all .pyc files with the old `MAGIC_NUMBER`
|
||||
to be recompiled by the interpreter on import. Whenever `MAGIC_NUMBER` is
|
||||
changed, the ranges in the `magic_values` array in
|
||||
[`PC/launcher.c`](../PC/launcher.c) may also need to be updated. Changes to
|
||||
[`Lib/importlib/_bootstrap_external.py`](../Lib/importlib/_bootstrap_external.py)
|
||||
will take effect only after running `make regen-importlib`.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!NOTE]
|
||||
> Running `make regen-importlib` before adding the new bytecode target to
|
||||
> [`Python/bytecodes.c`](../Python/bytecodes.c)
|
||||
> (followed by `make regen-cases`) will result in an error. You should only run
|
||||
> `make regen-importlib` after the new bytecode target has been added.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!NOTE]
|
||||
> On Windows, running the `./build.bat` script will automatically
|
||||
> regenerate the required files without requiring additional arguments.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, you need to introduce the use of the new bytecode. Update
|
||||
[`Python/codegen.c`](../Python/codegen.c) to emit code with this bytecode.
|
||||
Optimizations in [`Python/flowgraph.c`](../Python/flowgraph.c) may also
|
||||
need to be updated. If the new opcode affects a control flow or the block
|
||||
stack, you may have to update the `frame_setlineno()` function in
|
||||
[`Objects/frameobject.c`](../Objects/frameobject.c). It may also be necessary
|
||||
to update [`Lib/dis.py`](../Lib/dis.py) if the new opcode interprets its
|
||||
argument in a special way (like `FORMAT_VALUE` or `MAKE_FUNCTION`).
|
||||
|
||||
If you make a change here that can affect the output of bytecode that
|
||||
is already in existence and you do not change the magic number, make
|
||||
sure to delete your old .py(c|o) files! Even though you will end up changing
|
||||
the magic number if you change the bytecode, while you are debugging your work
|
||||
you may be changing the bytecode output without constantly bumping up the
|
||||
magic number. This can leave you with stale .pyc files that will not be
|
||||
recreated.
|
||||
Running `find . -name '*.py[co]' -exec rm -f '{}' +` should delete all .pyc
|
||||
files you have, forcing new ones to be created and thus allow you test out your
|
||||
new bytecode properly. Run `make regen-importlib` for updating the
|
||||
bytecode of frozen importlib files. You have to run `make` again after this
|
||||
to recompile the generated C files.
|
||||
|
||||
Additional resources
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
* Brandt Bucher's talk about the specializing interpreter at PyCon US 2023.
|
||||
[Slides](https://github.com/brandtbucher/brandtbucher/blob/master/2023/04/21/inside_cpython_311s_new_specializing_adaptive_interpreter.pdf)
|
||||
[Video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGZPSWZSkJI&t=1470s)
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue