From 669175bf8edc2c02d48401bac0e4c7d99a33f15b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikita Sobolev Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 12:16:52 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] gh-116860: Remove outdated `test_parserhack` from `test_future` (#116861) --- Lib/test/test_future_stmt/test_future.py | 20 -------------------- 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/Lib/test/test_future_stmt/test_future.py b/Lib/test/test_future_stmt/test_future.py index 69ae58b0fbc..bb31d0a0023 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_future_stmt/test_future.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_future_stmt/test_future.py @@ -171,26 +171,6 @@ class FutureTest(unittest.TestCase): } self.assertCountEqual(set(flags.values()), flags.values()) - def test_parserhack(self): - # test that the parser.c::future_hack function works as expected - # Note: although this test must pass, it's not testing the original - # bug as of 2.6 since the with statement is not optional and - # the parser hack disabled. If a new keyword is introduced in - # 2.6, change this to refer to the new future import. - try: - exec("from __future__ import print_function; print 0") - except SyntaxError: - pass - else: - self.fail("syntax error didn't occur") - - try: - exec("from __future__ import (print_function); print 0") - except SyntaxError: - pass - else: - self.fail("syntax error didn't occur") - def test_unicode_literals_exec(self): scope = {} exec("from __future__ import unicode_literals; x = ''", {}, scope)