mirror of https://github.com/python/cpython
Correct information on support for repietition & concatenation for buffer
and xrange objects. This closes SF bug #550555.
This commit is contained in:
parent
485f340d52
commit
4b270518b7
|
@ -393,15 +393,17 @@ item tuple must have a trailing comma, e.g., \code{(d,)}.
|
|||
|
||||
Buffer objects are not directly supported by Python syntax, but can be
|
||||
created by calling the builtin function
|
||||
\function{buffer()}.\bifuncindex{buffer}. They don't support
|
||||
concatenation or repetition.
|
||||
\function{buffer()}.\bifuncindex{buffer}. They support
|
||||
concatenation and repetition, but the result is a new string object
|
||||
rather than a new buffer object.
|
||||
\obindex{buffer}
|
||||
|
||||
Xrange objects are similar to buffers in that there is no specific
|
||||
syntax to create them, but they are created using the \function{xrange()}
|
||||
function.\bifuncindex{xrange} They don't support slicing,
|
||||
concatenation or repetition, and using \code{in}, \code{not in},
|
||||
\function{min()} or \function{max()} on them is inefficient.
|
||||
syntax to create them, but they are created using the
|
||||
\function{xrange()} function.\bifuncindex{xrange} They don't support
|
||||
slicing or concatenation, but do support repetition, and using
|
||||
\code{in}, \code{not in}, \function{min()} or \function{max()} on them
|
||||
is inefficient.
|
||||
\obindex{xrange}
|
||||
|
||||
Most sequence types support the following operations. The \samp{in} and
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue