mirror of https://github.com/python/cpython
save_inst(): Rewrote to have only one branch on self.bin. Also got rid
of my recent XXX comment, taking a (what appears to be vanishingly small) chance and calling self.memoize() instead.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d6c9e63af9
commit
3b769835ca
|
@ -551,7 +551,6 @@ class Pickler:
|
|||
dispatch[PyStringMap] = save_dict
|
||||
|
||||
def save_inst(self, object):
|
||||
d = id(object)
|
||||
cls = object.__class__
|
||||
|
||||
memo = self.memo
|
||||
|
@ -569,23 +568,15 @@ class Pickler:
|
|||
|
||||
if self.bin:
|
||||
save(cls)
|
||||
|
||||
for arg in args:
|
||||
save(arg)
|
||||
|
||||
# This method does not use memoize() so that it can handle
|
||||
# the special case for non-binary mode.
|
||||
# XXX What did that comment mean? That is, what "special case for
|
||||
# XXX non-binary mode"? It sure *looks* like nothing special is
|
||||
# XXX happening in the INST case.
|
||||
memo_len = len(memo)
|
||||
if self.bin:
|
||||
write(OBJ + self.put(memo_len))
|
||||
for arg in args:
|
||||
save(arg)
|
||||
write(OBJ)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
write(INST + cls.__module__ + '\n' + cls.__name__ + '\n' +
|
||||
self.put(memo_len))
|
||||
for arg in args:
|
||||
save(arg)
|
||||
write(INST + cls.__module__ + '\n' + cls.__name__ + '\n')
|
||||
|
||||
memo[d] = (memo_len, object)
|
||||
self.memoize(object)
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
getstate = object.__getstate__
|
||||
|
@ -596,6 +587,7 @@ class Pickler:
|
|||
_keep_alive(stuff, memo)
|
||||
save(stuff)
|
||||
write(BUILD)
|
||||
|
||||
dispatch[InstanceType] = save_inst
|
||||
|
||||
def save_global(self, object, name = None):
|
||||
|
@ -626,6 +618,7 @@ class Pickler:
|
|||
|
||||
write(GLOBAL + module + '\n' + name + '\n')
|
||||
self.memoize(object)
|
||||
|
||||
dispatch[ClassType] = save_global
|
||||
dispatch[FunctionType] = save_global
|
||||
dispatch[BuiltinFunctionType] = save_global
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue