mirror of https://github.com/python/cpython
GH-70647: Deprecate strptime day of month parsing without a year present to avoid leap-year bugs (GH-117107)
This commit is contained in:
parent
595bb496b0
commit
33ee5cb3e9
|
@ -1079,6 +1079,24 @@ Other constructors, all class methods:
|
|||
time tuple. See also :ref:`strftime-strptime-behavior` and
|
||||
:meth:`datetime.fromisoformat`.
|
||||
|
||||
.. versionchanged:: 3.13
|
||||
|
||||
If *format* specifies a day of month without a year a
|
||||
:exc:`DeprecationWarning` is now emitted. This is to avoid a quadrennial
|
||||
leap year bug in code seeking to parse only a month and day as the
|
||||
default year used in absence of one in the format is not a leap year.
|
||||
Such *format* values may raise an error as of Python 3.15. The
|
||||
workaround is to always include a year in your *format*. If parsing
|
||||
*date_string* values that do not have a year, explicitly add a year that
|
||||
is a leap year before parsing:
|
||||
|
||||
.. doctest::
|
||||
|
||||
>>> from datetime import datetime
|
||||
>>> date_string = "02/29"
|
||||
>>> when = datetime.strptime(f"{date_string};1984", "%m/%d;%Y") # Avoids leap year bug.
|
||||
>>> when.strftime("%B %d") # doctest: +SKIP
|
||||
'February 29'
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Class attributes:
|
||||
|
@ -2657,6 +2675,25 @@ Notes:
|
|||
for formats ``%d``, ``%m``, ``%H``, ``%I``, ``%M``, ``%S``, ``%j``, ``%U``,
|
||||
``%W``, and ``%V``. Format ``%y`` does require a leading zero.
|
||||
|
||||
(10)
|
||||
When parsing a month and day using :meth:`~.datetime.strptime`, always
|
||||
include a year in the format. If the value you need to parse lacks a year,
|
||||
append an explicit dummy leap year. Otherwise your code will raise an
|
||||
exception when it encounters leap day because the default year used by the
|
||||
parser is not a leap year. Users run into this bug every four years...
|
||||
|
||||
.. doctest::
|
||||
|
||||
>>> month_day = "02/29"
|
||||
>>> datetime.strptime(f"{month_day};1984", "%m/%d;%Y") # No leap year bug.
|
||||
datetime.datetime(1984, 2, 29, 0, 0)
|
||||
|
||||
.. deprecated-removed:: 3.13 3.15
|
||||
:meth:`~.datetime.strptime` calls using a format string containing
|
||||
a day of month without a year now emit a
|
||||
:exc:`DeprecationWarning`. In 3.15 or later we may change this into
|
||||
an error or change the default year to a leap year. See :gh:`70647`.
|
||||
|
||||
.. rubric:: Footnotes
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#] If, that is, we ignore the effects of Relativity
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ FUNCTIONS:
|
|||
strptime -- Calculates the time struct represented by the passed-in string
|
||||
|
||||
"""
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import time
|
||||
import locale
|
||||
import calendar
|
||||
|
@ -250,12 +251,30 @@ class TimeRE(dict):
|
|||
format = regex_chars.sub(r"\\\1", format)
|
||||
whitespace_replacement = re_compile(r'\s+')
|
||||
format = whitespace_replacement.sub(r'\\s+', format)
|
||||
year_in_format = False
|
||||
day_of_month_in_format = False
|
||||
while '%' in format:
|
||||
directive_index = format.index('%')+1
|
||||
format_char = format[directive_index]
|
||||
processed_format = "%s%s%s" % (processed_format,
|
||||
format[:directive_index-1],
|
||||
self[format[directive_index]])
|
||||
self[format_char])
|
||||
format = format[directive_index+1:]
|
||||
match format_char:
|
||||
case 'Y' | 'y' | 'G':
|
||||
year_in_format = True
|
||||
case 'd':
|
||||
day_of_month_in_format = True
|
||||
if day_of_month_in_format and not year_in_format:
|
||||
import warnings
|
||||
warnings.warn("""\
|
||||
Parsing dates involving a day of month without a year specified is ambiguious
|
||||
and fails to parse leap day. The default behavior will change in Python 3.15
|
||||
to either always raise an exception or to use a different default year (TBD).
|
||||
To avoid trouble, add a specific year to the input & format.
|
||||
See https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/70647.""",
|
||||
DeprecationWarning,
|
||||
skip_file_prefixes=(os.path.dirname(__file__),))
|
||||
return "%s%s" % (processed_format, format)
|
||||
|
||||
def compile(self, format):
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2793,6 +2793,19 @@ class TestDateTime(TestDate):
|
|||
newdate = strptime(string, format)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(newdate, target, msg=reason)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_strptime_leap_year(self):
|
||||
# GH-70647: warns if parsing a format with a day and no year.
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
|
||||
# The existing behavior that GH-70647 seeks to change.
|
||||
self.theclass.strptime('02-29', '%m-%d')
|
||||
with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning,
|
||||
r'.*day of month without a year.*'):
|
||||
self.theclass.strptime('03-14.159265', '%m-%d.%f')
|
||||
with self._assertNotWarns(DeprecationWarning):
|
||||
self.theclass.strptime('20-03-14.159265', '%y-%m-%d.%f')
|
||||
with self._assertNotWarns(DeprecationWarning):
|
||||
self.theclass.strptime('02-29,2024', '%m-%d,%Y')
|
||||
|
||||
def test_more_timetuple(self):
|
||||
# This tests fields beyond those tested by the TestDate.test_timetuple.
|
||||
t = self.theclass(2004, 12, 31, 6, 22, 33)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -277,6 +277,8 @@ class TimeTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
'j', 'm', 'M', 'p', 'S',
|
||||
'U', 'w', 'W', 'x', 'X', 'y', 'Y', 'Z', '%'):
|
||||
format = '%' + directive
|
||||
if directive == 'd':
|
||||
format += ',%Y' # Avoid GH-70647.
|
||||
strf_output = time.strftime(format, tt)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
time.strptime(strf_output, format)
|
||||
|
@ -299,6 +301,12 @@ class TimeTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
time.strptime('19', '%Y %')
|
||||
self.assertIs(e.exception.__suppress_context__, True)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_strptime_leap_year(self):
|
||||
# GH-70647: warns if parsing a format with a day and no year.
|
||||
with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning,
|
||||
r'.*day of month without a year.*'):
|
||||
time.strptime('02-07 18:28', '%m-%d %H:%M')
|
||||
|
||||
def test_asctime(self):
|
||||
time.asctime(time.gmtime(self.t))
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -386,6 +386,16 @@ class TestLongMessage(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
'^UserWarning not triggered$',
|
||||
'^UserWarning not triggered : oops$'])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_assertNotWarns(self):
|
||||
def warn_future():
|
||||
warnings.warn('xyz', FutureWarning, stacklevel=2)
|
||||
self.assertMessagesCM('_assertNotWarns', (FutureWarning,),
|
||||
warn_future,
|
||||
['^FutureWarning triggered$',
|
||||
'^oops$',
|
||||
'^FutureWarning triggered$',
|
||||
'^FutureWarning triggered : oops$'])
|
||||
|
||||
def testAssertWarnsRegex(self):
|
||||
# test error not raised
|
||||
self.assertMessagesCM('assertWarnsRegex', (UserWarning, 'unused regex'),
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -332,6 +332,23 @@ class _AssertWarnsContext(_AssertRaisesBaseContext):
|
|||
self._raiseFailure("{} not triggered".format(exc_name))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _AssertNotWarnsContext(_AssertWarnsContext):
|
||||
|
||||
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, tb):
|
||||
self.warnings_manager.__exit__(exc_type, exc_value, tb)
|
||||
if exc_type is not None:
|
||||
# let unexpected exceptions pass through
|
||||
return
|
||||
try:
|
||||
exc_name = self.expected.__name__
|
||||
except AttributeError:
|
||||
exc_name = str(self.expected)
|
||||
for m in self.warnings:
|
||||
w = m.message
|
||||
if isinstance(w, self.expected):
|
||||
self._raiseFailure(f"{exc_name} triggered")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _OrderedChainMap(collections.ChainMap):
|
||||
def __iter__(self):
|
||||
seen = set()
|
||||
|
@ -811,6 +828,11 @@ class TestCase(object):
|
|||
context = _AssertWarnsContext(expected_warning, self)
|
||||
return context.handle('assertWarns', args, kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
def _assertNotWarns(self, expected_warning, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
"""The opposite of assertWarns. Private due to low demand."""
|
||||
context = _AssertNotWarnsContext(expected_warning, self)
|
||||
return context.handle('_assertNotWarns', args, kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
def assertLogs(self, logger=None, level=None):
|
||||
"""Fail unless a log message of level *level* or higher is emitted
|
||||
on *logger_name* or its children. If omitted, *level* defaults to
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
Start the deprecation period for the current behavior of
|
||||
:func:`datetime.datetime.strptime` and :func:`time.strptime` which always
|
||||
fails to parse a date string with a :exc:`ValueError` involving a day of
|
||||
month such as ``strptime("02-29", "%m-%d")`` when a year is **not**
|
||||
specified and the date happen to be February 29th. This should help avoid
|
||||
users finding new bugs every four years due to a natural mistaken assumption
|
||||
about the API when parsing partial date values.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue