Test case, distilled from SF bug #631350, where a subobject in a

multipart/digest isn't a message/rfc822.  This is legal, but counter
to recommended practice in RFC 2046, $5.1.5.
This commit is contained in:
Barry Warsaw 2002-11-05 20:53:18 +00:00
parent 9288f95cb5
commit 00e6a02ef8
1 changed files with 19 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
From: aperson@dom.ain
To: bperson@dom.ain
Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary=XYZ
--XYZ
Content-Type: text/plain
This is a text plain part that is counter to recommended practice in
RFC 2046, $5.1.5, but is not illegal
--XYZ
From: cperson@dom.ain
To: dperson@dom.ain
A submessage
--XYZ--