2022-10-26 02:00:50 -03:00
|
|
|
"""Python implementations of some algorithms for use by longobject.c.
|
|
|
|
The goal is to provide asymptotically faster algorithms that can be
|
|
|
|
used for operations on integers with many digits. In those cases, the
|
|
|
|
performance overhead of the Python implementation is not significant
|
|
|
|
since the asymptotic behavior is what dominates runtime. Functions
|
|
|
|
provided by this module should be considered private and not part of any
|
|
|
|
public API.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: for ease of maintainability, please prefer clear code and avoid
|
|
|
|
"micro-optimizations". This module will only be imported and used for
|
|
|
|
integers with a huge number of digits. Saving a few microseconds with
|
|
|
|
tricky or non-obvious code is not worth it. For people looking for
|
|
|
|
maximum performance, they should use something like gmpy2."""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import re
|
|
|
|
import decimal
|
gh-118164: Break a loop between _pydecimal and _pylong and optimize int to str conversion (GH-118483)
For converting large ints to strings, CPython invokes a function in _pylong.py,
which uses the decimal module to implement an asymptotically waaaaay
sub-quadratic algorithm. But if the C decimal module isn't available, CPython
uses _pydecimal.py instead. Which in turn frequently does str(int). If the int
is very large, _pylong ends up doing the work, which in turn asks decimal to do
"big" arithmetic, which in turn calls str(big_int), which in turn ... it can
become infinite mutual recursion.
This change introduces a different int->str function that doesn't use decimal.
It's asymptotically worse, "Karatsuba time" instead of quadratic time, so
still a huge improvement. _pylong switches to that when the C decimal isn't
available. It is also used for not too large integers (less than 450_000 bits),
where it is faster (up to 2 times for 30_000 bits) than the asymptotically
better implementation that uses the C decimal.
Co-authored-by: Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com>
2024-05-05 02:20:06 -03:00
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
import _decimal
|
|
|
|
except ImportError:
|
|
|
|
_decimal = None
|
2022-10-26 02:00:50 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2024-05-07 21:09:09 -03:00
|
|
|
# A number of functions have this form, where `w` is a desired number of
|
|
|
|
# digits in base `base`:
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# def inner(...w...):
|
|
|
|
# if w <= LIMIT:
|
|
|
|
# return something
|
|
|
|
# lo = w >> 1
|
|
|
|
# hi = w - lo
|
|
|
|
# something involving base**lo, inner(...lo...), j, and inner(...hi...)
|
|
|
|
# figure out largest w needed
|
|
|
|
# result = inner(w)
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# They all had some on-the-fly scheme to cache `base**lo` results for reuse.
|
|
|
|
# Power is costly.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# This routine aims to compute all amd only the needed powers in advance, as
|
|
|
|
# efficiently as reasonably possible. This isn't trivial, and all the
|
|
|
|
# on-the-fly methods did needless work in many cases. The driving code above
|
|
|
|
# changes to:
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# figure out largest w needed
|
|
|
|
# mycache = compute_powers(w, base, LIMIT)
|
|
|
|
# result = inner(w)
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# and `mycache[lo]` replaces `base**lo` in the inner function.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# While this does give minor speedups (a few percent at best), the primary
|
|
|
|
# intent is to simplify the functions using this, by eliminating the need for
|
|
|
|
# them to craft their own ad-hoc caching schemes.
|
|
|
|
def compute_powers(w, base, more_than, show=False):
|
|
|
|
seen = set()
|
|
|
|
need = set()
|
|
|
|
ws = {w}
|
|
|
|
while ws:
|
|
|
|
w = ws.pop() # any element is fine to use next
|
|
|
|
if w in seen or w <= more_than:
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
seen.add(w)
|
|
|
|
lo = w >> 1
|
|
|
|
# only _need_ lo here; some other path may, or may not, need hi
|
|
|
|
need.add(lo)
|
|
|
|
ws.add(lo)
|
|
|
|
if w & 1:
|
|
|
|
ws.add(lo + 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d = {}
|
|
|
|
if not need:
|
|
|
|
return d
|
|
|
|
it = iter(sorted(need))
|
|
|
|
first = next(it)
|
|
|
|
if show:
|
|
|
|
print("pow at", first)
|
|
|
|
d[first] = base ** first
|
|
|
|
for this in it:
|
|
|
|
if this - 1 in d:
|
|
|
|
if show:
|
|
|
|
print("* base at", this)
|
|
|
|
d[this] = d[this - 1] * base # cheap
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
lo = this >> 1
|
|
|
|
hi = this - lo
|
|
|
|
assert lo in d
|
|
|
|
if show:
|
|
|
|
print("square at", this)
|
|
|
|
# Multiplying a bigint by itself (same object!) is about twice
|
|
|
|
# as fast in CPython.
|
|
|
|
sq = d[lo] * d[lo]
|
|
|
|
if hi != lo:
|
|
|
|
assert hi == lo + 1
|
|
|
|
if show:
|
|
|
|
print(" and * base")
|
|
|
|
sq *= base
|
|
|
|
d[this] = sq
|
|
|
|
return d
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_unbounded_dec_context = decimal.getcontext().copy()
|
|
|
|
_unbounded_dec_context.prec = decimal.MAX_PREC
|
|
|
|
_unbounded_dec_context.Emax = decimal.MAX_EMAX
|
|
|
|
_unbounded_dec_context.Emin = decimal.MIN_EMIN
|
|
|
|
_unbounded_dec_context.traps[decimal.Inexact] = 1 # sanity check
|
2022-10-26 02:00:50 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def int_to_decimal(n):
|
|
|
|
"""Asymptotically fast conversion of an 'int' to Decimal."""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Function due to Tim Peters. See GH issue #90716 for details.
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/90716
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# The implementation in longobject.c of base conversion algorithms
|
|
|
|
# between power-of-2 and non-power-of-2 bases are quadratic time.
|
|
|
|
# This function implements a divide-and-conquer algorithm that is
|
|
|
|
# faster for large numbers. Builds an equal decimal.Decimal in a
|
|
|
|
# "clever" recursive way. If we want a string representation, we
|
|
|
|
# apply str to _that_.
|
|
|
|
|
2024-05-07 21:09:09 -03:00
|
|
|
from decimal import Decimal as D
|
|
|
|
BITLIM = 200
|
2022-10-26 02:00:50 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2024-05-07 21:09:09 -03:00
|
|
|
# Don't bother caching the "lo" mask in this; the time to compute it is
|
|
|
|
# tiny compared to the multiply.
|
2022-10-26 02:00:50 -03:00
|
|
|
def inner(n, w):
|
|
|
|
if w <= BITLIM:
|
|
|
|
return D(n)
|
|
|
|
w2 = w >> 1
|
|
|
|
hi = n >> w2
|
2024-05-07 21:09:09 -03:00
|
|
|
lo = n & ((1 << w2) - 1)
|
|
|
|
return inner(lo, w2) + inner(hi, w - w2) * w2pow[w2]
|
2022-10-26 02:00:50 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2024-05-07 21:09:09 -03:00
|
|
|
with decimal.localcontext(_unbounded_dec_context):
|
|
|
|
nbits = n.bit_length()
|
|
|
|
w2pow = compute_powers(nbits, D(2), BITLIM)
|
2022-10-26 02:00:50 -03:00
|
|
|
if n < 0:
|
|
|
|
negate = True
|
|
|
|
n = -n
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
negate = False
|
2024-05-07 21:09:09 -03:00
|
|
|
result = inner(n, nbits)
|
2022-10-26 02:00:50 -03:00
|
|
|
if negate:
|
|
|
|
result = -result
|
|
|
|
return result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def int_to_decimal_string(n):
|
|
|
|
"""Asymptotically fast conversion of an 'int' to a decimal string."""
|
gh-118164: Break a loop between _pydecimal and _pylong and optimize int to str conversion (GH-118483)
For converting large ints to strings, CPython invokes a function in _pylong.py,
which uses the decimal module to implement an asymptotically waaaaay
sub-quadratic algorithm. But if the C decimal module isn't available, CPython
uses _pydecimal.py instead. Which in turn frequently does str(int). If the int
is very large, _pylong ends up doing the work, which in turn asks decimal to do
"big" arithmetic, which in turn calls str(big_int), which in turn ... it can
become infinite mutual recursion.
This change introduces a different int->str function that doesn't use decimal.
It's asymptotically worse, "Karatsuba time" instead of quadratic time, so
still a huge improvement. _pylong switches to that when the C decimal isn't
available. It is also used for not too large integers (less than 450_000 bits),
where it is faster (up to 2 times for 30_000 bits) than the asymptotically
better implementation that uses the C decimal.
Co-authored-by: Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com>
2024-05-05 02:20:06 -03:00
|
|
|
w = n.bit_length()
|
|
|
|
if w > 450_000 and _decimal is not None:
|
|
|
|
# It is only usable with the C decimal implementation.
|
|
|
|
# _pydecimal.py calls str() on very large integers, which in its
|
|
|
|
# turn calls int_to_decimal_string(), causing very deep recursion.
|
|
|
|
return str(int_to_decimal(n))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Fallback algorithm for the case when the C decimal module isn't
|
|
|
|
# available. This algorithm is asymptotically worse than the algorithm
|
|
|
|
# using the decimal module, but better than the quadratic time
|
|
|
|
# implementation in longobject.c.
|
2024-05-07 21:09:09 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIGLIM = 1000
|
gh-118164: Break a loop between _pydecimal and _pylong and optimize int to str conversion (GH-118483)
For converting large ints to strings, CPython invokes a function in _pylong.py,
which uses the decimal module to implement an asymptotically waaaaay
sub-quadratic algorithm. But if the C decimal module isn't available, CPython
uses _pydecimal.py instead. Which in turn frequently does str(int). If the int
is very large, _pylong ends up doing the work, which in turn asks decimal to do
"big" arithmetic, which in turn calls str(big_int), which in turn ... it can
become infinite mutual recursion.
This change introduces a different int->str function that doesn't use decimal.
It's asymptotically worse, "Karatsuba time" instead of quadratic time, so
still a huge improvement. _pylong switches to that when the C decimal isn't
available. It is also used for not too large integers (less than 450_000 bits),
where it is faster (up to 2 times for 30_000 bits) than the asymptotically
better implementation that uses the C decimal.
Co-authored-by: Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com>
2024-05-05 02:20:06 -03:00
|
|
|
def inner(n, w):
|
2024-05-07 21:09:09 -03:00
|
|
|
if w <= DIGLIM:
|
gh-118164: Break a loop between _pydecimal and _pylong and optimize int to str conversion (GH-118483)
For converting large ints to strings, CPython invokes a function in _pylong.py,
which uses the decimal module to implement an asymptotically waaaaay
sub-quadratic algorithm. But if the C decimal module isn't available, CPython
uses _pydecimal.py instead. Which in turn frequently does str(int). If the int
is very large, _pylong ends up doing the work, which in turn asks decimal to do
"big" arithmetic, which in turn calls str(big_int), which in turn ... it can
become infinite mutual recursion.
This change introduces a different int->str function that doesn't use decimal.
It's asymptotically worse, "Karatsuba time" instead of quadratic time, so
still a huge improvement. _pylong switches to that when the C decimal isn't
available. It is also used for not too large integers (less than 450_000 bits),
where it is faster (up to 2 times for 30_000 bits) than the asymptotically
better implementation that uses the C decimal.
Co-authored-by: Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com>
2024-05-05 02:20:06 -03:00
|
|
|
return str(n)
|
|
|
|
w2 = w >> 1
|
2024-05-07 21:09:09 -03:00
|
|
|
hi, lo = divmod(n, pow10[w2])
|
gh-118164: Break a loop between _pydecimal and _pylong and optimize int to str conversion (GH-118483)
For converting large ints to strings, CPython invokes a function in _pylong.py,
which uses the decimal module to implement an asymptotically waaaaay
sub-quadratic algorithm. But if the C decimal module isn't available, CPython
uses _pydecimal.py instead. Which in turn frequently does str(int). If the int
is very large, _pylong ends up doing the work, which in turn asks decimal to do
"big" arithmetic, which in turn calls str(big_int), which in turn ... it can
become infinite mutual recursion.
This change introduces a different int->str function that doesn't use decimal.
It's asymptotically worse, "Karatsuba time" instead of quadratic time, so
still a huge improvement. _pylong switches to that when the C decimal isn't
available. It is also used for not too large integers (less than 450_000 bits),
where it is faster (up to 2 times for 30_000 bits) than the asymptotically
better implementation that uses the C decimal.
Co-authored-by: Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com>
2024-05-05 02:20:06 -03:00
|
|
|
return inner(hi, w - w2) + inner(lo, w2).zfill(w2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The estimation of the number of decimal digits.
|
|
|
|
# There is no harm in small error. If we guess too large, there may
|
|
|
|
# be leading 0's that need to be stripped. If we guess too small, we
|
|
|
|
# may need to call str() recursively for the remaining highest digits,
|
|
|
|
# which can still potentially be a large integer. This is manifested
|
|
|
|
# only if the number has way more than 10**15 digits, that exceeds
|
|
|
|
# the 52-bit physical address limit in both Intel64 and AMD64.
|
|
|
|
w = int(w * 0.3010299956639812 + 1) # log10(2)
|
2024-05-07 21:09:09 -03:00
|
|
|
pow10 = compute_powers(w, 5, DIGLIM)
|
|
|
|
for k, v in pow10.items():
|
|
|
|
pow10[k] = v << k # 5**k << k == 5**k * 2**k == 10**k
|
gh-118164: Break a loop between _pydecimal and _pylong and optimize int to str conversion (GH-118483)
For converting large ints to strings, CPython invokes a function in _pylong.py,
which uses the decimal module to implement an asymptotically waaaaay
sub-quadratic algorithm. But if the C decimal module isn't available, CPython
uses _pydecimal.py instead. Which in turn frequently does str(int). If the int
is very large, _pylong ends up doing the work, which in turn asks decimal to do
"big" arithmetic, which in turn calls str(big_int), which in turn ... it can
become infinite mutual recursion.
This change introduces a different int->str function that doesn't use decimal.
It's asymptotically worse, "Karatsuba time" instead of quadratic time, so
still a huge improvement. _pylong switches to that when the C decimal isn't
available. It is also used for not too large integers (less than 450_000 bits),
where it is faster (up to 2 times for 30_000 bits) than the asymptotically
better implementation that uses the C decimal.
Co-authored-by: Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com>
2024-05-05 02:20:06 -03:00
|
|
|
if n < 0:
|
|
|
|
n = -n
|
|
|
|
sign = '-'
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
sign = ''
|
|
|
|
s = inner(n, w)
|
|
|
|
if s[0] == '0' and n:
|
|
|
|
# If our guess of w is too large, there may be leading 0's that
|
|
|
|
# need to be stripped.
|
|
|
|
s = s.lstrip('0')
|
|
|
|
return sign + s
|
2022-10-26 02:00:50 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _str_to_int_inner(s):
|
|
|
|
"""Asymptotically fast conversion of a 'str' to an 'int'."""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Function due to Bjorn Martinsson. See GH issue #90716 for details.
|
|
|
|
# https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/90716
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# The implementation in longobject.c of base conversion algorithms
|
|
|
|
# between power-of-2 and non-power-of-2 bases are quadratic time.
|
|
|
|
# This function implements a divide-and-conquer algorithm making use
|
|
|
|
# of Python's built in big int multiplication. Since Python uses the
|
|
|
|
# Karatsuba algorithm for multiplication, the time complexity
|
|
|
|
# of this function is O(len(s)**1.58).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIGLIM = 2048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def inner(a, b):
|
|
|
|
if b - a <= DIGLIM:
|
|
|
|
return int(s[a:b])
|
|
|
|
mid = (a + b + 1) >> 1
|
2024-05-07 21:09:09 -03:00
|
|
|
return (inner(mid, b)
|
|
|
|
+ ((inner(a, mid) * w5pow[b - mid])
|
|
|
|
<< (b - mid)))
|
2022-10-26 02:00:50 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2024-05-07 21:09:09 -03:00
|
|
|
w5pow = compute_powers(len(s), 5, DIGLIM)
|
2022-10-26 02:00:50 -03:00
|
|
|
return inner(0, len(s))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def int_from_string(s):
|
|
|
|
"""Asymptotically fast version of PyLong_FromString(), conversion
|
|
|
|
of a string of decimal digits into an 'int'."""
|
|
|
|
# PyLong_FromString() has already removed leading +/-, checked for invalid
|
|
|
|
# use of underscore characters, checked that string consists of only digits
|
|
|
|
# and underscores, and stripped leading whitespace. The input can still
|
|
|
|
# contain underscores and have trailing whitespace.
|
|
|
|
s = s.rstrip().replace('_', '')
|
|
|
|
return _str_to_int_inner(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def str_to_int(s):
|
|
|
|
"""Asymptotically fast version of decimal string to 'int' conversion."""
|
|
|
|
# FIXME: this doesn't support the full syntax that int() supports.
|
|
|
|
m = re.match(r'\s*([+-]?)([0-9_]+)\s*', s)
|
|
|
|
if not m:
|
|
|
|
raise ValueError('invalid literal for int() with base 10')
|
|
|
|
v = int_from_string(m.group(2))
|
|
|
|
if m.group(1) == '-':
|
|
|
|
v = -v
|
|
|
|
return v
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Fast integer division, based on code from Mark Dickinson, fast_div.py
|
|
|
|
# GH-47701. Additional refinements and optimizations by Bjorn Martinsson. The
|
|
|
|
# algorithm is due to Burnikel and Ziegler, in their paper "Fast Recursive
|
|
|
|
# Division".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_DIV_LIMIT = 4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _div2n1n(a, b, n):
|
|
|
|
"""Divide a 2n-bit nonnegative integer a by an n-bit positive integer
|
|
|
|
b, using a recursive divide-and-conquer algorithm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
n is a positive integer
|
|
|
|
b is a positive integer with exactly n bits
|
|
|
|
a is a nonnegative integer such that a < 2**n * b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
(q, r) such that a = b*q+r and 0 <= r < b.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
if a.bit_length() - n <= _DIV_LIMIT:
|
|
|
|
return divmod(a, b)
|
|
|
|
pad = n & 1
|
|
|
|
if pad:
|
|
|
|
a <<= 1
|
|
|
|
b <<= 1
|
|
|
|
n += 1
|
|
|
|
half_n = n >> 1
|
|
|
|
mask = (1 << half_n) - 1
|
|
|
|
b1, b2 = b >> half_n, b & mask
|
|
|
|
q1, r = _div3n2n(a >> n, (a >> half_n) & mask, b, b1, b2, half_n)
|
|
|
|
q2, r = _div3n2n(r, a & mask, b, b1, b2, half_n)
|
|
|
|
if pad:
|
|
|
|
r >>= 1
|
|
|
|
return q1 << half_n | q2, r
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _div3n2n(a12, a3, b, b1, b2, n):
|
|
|
|
"""Helper function for _div2n1n; not intended to be called directly."""
|
|
|
|
if a12 >> n == b1:
|
|
|
|
q, r = (1 << n) - 1, a12 - (b1 << n) + b1
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
q, r = _div2n1n(a12, b1, n)
|
|
|
|
r = (r << n | a3) - q * b2
|
|
|
|
while r < 0:
|
|
|
|
q -= 1
|
|
|
|
r += b
|
|
|
|
return q, r
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _int2digits(a, n):
|
|
|
|
"""Decompose non-negative int a into base 2**n
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Input:
|
|
|
|
a is a non-negative integer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
List of the digits of a in base 2**n in little-endian order,
|
|
|
|
meaning the most significant digit is last. The most
|
|
|
|
significant digit is guaranteed to be non-zero.
|
|
|
|
If a is 0 then the output is an empty list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
a_digits = [0] * ((a.bit_length() + n - 1) // n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def inner(x, L, R):
|
|
|
|
if L + 1 == R:
|
|
|
|
a_digits[L] = x
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
mid = (L + R) >> 1
|
|
|
|
shift = (mid - L) * n
|
|
|
|
upper = x >> shift
|
|
|
|
lower = x ^ (upper << shift)
|
|
|
|
inner(lower, L, mid)
|
|
|
|
inner(upper, mid, R)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if a:
|
|
|
|
inner(a, 0, len(a_digits))
|
|
|
|
return a_digits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _digits2int(digits, n):
|
|
|
|
"""Combine base-2**n digits into an int. This function is the
|
|
|
|
inverse of `_int2digits`. For more details, see _int2digits.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def inner(L, R):
|
|
|
|
if L + 1 == R:
|
|
|
|
return digits[L]
|
|
|
|
mid = (L + R) >> 1
|
|
|
|
shift = (mid - L) * n
|
|
|
|
return (inner(mid, R) << shift) + inner(L, mid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return inner(0, len(digits)) if digits else 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _divmod_pos(a, b):
|
|
|
|
"""Divide a non-negative integer a by a positive integer b, giving
|
|
|
|
quotient and remainder."""
|
|
|
|
# Use grade-school algorithm in base 2**n, n = nbits(b)
|
|
|
|
n = b.bit_length()
|
|
|
|
a_digits = _int2digits(a, n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r = 0
|
|
|
|
q_digits = []
|
|
|
|
for a_digit in reversed(a_digits):
|
|
|
|
q_digit, r = _div2n1n((r << n) + a_digit, b, n)
|
|
|
|
q_digits.append(q_digit)
|
|
|
|
q_digits.reverse()
|
|
|
|
q = _digits2int(q_digits, n)
|
|
|
|
return q, r
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def int_divmod(a, b):
|
|
|
|
"""Asymptotically fast replacement for divmod, for 'int'.
|
|
|
|
Its time complexity is O(n**1.58), where n = #bits(a) + #bits(b).
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
if b == 0:
|
|
|
|
raise ZeroDivisionError
|
|
|
|
elif b < 0:
|
|
|
|
q, r = int_divmod(-a, -b)
|
|
|
|
return q, -r
|
|
|
|
elif a < 0:
|
|
|
|
q, r = int_divmod(~a, b)
|
|
|
|
return ~q, b + ~r
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
return _divmod_pos(a, b)
|