2010-03-30 14:58:13 -03:00
|
|
|
import re
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
import sys
|
2006-07-27 20:43:15 -03:00
|
|
|
import types
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
import unittest
|
|
|
|
import inspect
|
2010-06-16 22:36:52 -03:00
|
|
|
import linecache
|
2006-07-27 20:43:15 -03:00
|
|
|
import datetime
|
2010-03-30 14:58:13 -03:00
|
|
|
from UserList import UserList
|
|
|
|
from UserDict import UserDict
|
2001-02-27 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-20 22:14:24 -03:00
|
|
|
from test.test_support import run_unittest, check_py3k_warnings
|
2001-02-27 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-20 22:14:24 -03:00
|
|
|
with check_py3k_warnings(
|
|
|
|
("tuple parameter unpacking has been removed", SyntaxWarning),
|
|
|
|
quiet=True):
|
|
|
|
from test import inspect_fodder as mod
|
|
|
|
from test import inspect_fodder2 as mod2
|
2001-02-27 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-05-13 14:14:11 -03:00
|
|
|
# C module for test_findsource_binary
|
2009-05-14 13:12:57 -03:00
|
|
|
import unicodedata
|
2009-05-13 14:14:11 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2001-02-27 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
# Functions tested in this suite:
|
|
|
|
# ismodule, isclass, ismethod, isfunction, istraceback, isframe, iscode,
|
2008-02-17 23:43:43 -04:00
|
|
|
# isbuiltin, isroutine, isgenerator, isgeneratorfunction, getmembers,
|
|
|
|
# getdoc, getfile, getmodule, getsourcefile, getcomments, getsource,
|
|
|
|
# getclasstree, getargspec, getargvalues, formatargspec, formatargvalues,
|
|
|
|
# currentframe, stack, trace, isdatadescriptor
|
2001-02-27 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2008-12-14 06:54:50 -04:00
|
|
|
# NOTE: There are some additional tests relating to interaction with
|
|
|
|
# zipimport in the test_zipimport_support test module.
|
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
modfile = mod.__file__
|
2006-06-09 17:43:48 -03:00
|
|
|
if modfile.endswith(('c', 'o')):
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
modfile = modfile[:-1]
|
2001-02-27 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
import __builtin__
|
2001-02-27 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
try:
|
2010-03-20 22:14:24 -03:00
|
|
|
1 // 0
|
2001-02-27 10:43:21 -04:00
|
|
|
except:
|
|
|
|
tb = sys.exc_traceback
|
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
git = mod.StupidGit()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class IsTestBase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|
|
|
predicates = set([inspect.isbuiltin, inspect.isclass, inspect.iscode,
|
|
|
|
inspect.isframe, inspect.isfunction, inspect.ismethod,
|
2008-02-17 23:43:43 -04:00
|
|
|
inspect.ismodule, inspect.istraceback,
|
|
|
|
inspect.isgenerator, inspect.isgeneratorfunction])
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
def istest(self, predicate, exp):
|
|
|
|
obj = eval(exp)
|
2009-06-30 19:57:08 -03:00
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(predicate(obj), '%s(%s)' % (predicate.__name__, exp))
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
for other in self.predicates - set([predicate]):
|
2008-02-17 23:43:43 -04:00
|
|
|
if predicate == inspect.isgeneratorfunction and\
|
|
|
|
other == inspect.isfunction:
|
|
|
|
continue
|
2009-06-30 19:57:08 -03:00
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(other(obj), 'not %s(%s)' % (other.__name__, exp))
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-17 23:43:43 -04:00
|
|
|
def generator_function_example(self):
|
|
|
|
for i in xrange(2):
|
|
|
|
yield i
|
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
class TestPredicates(IsTestBase):
|
2008-03-03 16:30:29 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_sixteen(self):
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
count = len(filter(lambda x:x.startswith('is'), dir(inspect)))
|
2008-02-17 23:43:43 -04:00
|
|
|
# This test is here for remember you to update Doc/library/inspect.rst
|
2008-03-03 16:39:00 -04:00
|
|
|
# which claims there are 16 such functions
|
2008-03-03 16:30:29 -04:00
|
|
|
expected = 16
|
2006-07-28 01:22:34 -03:00
|
|
|
err_msg = "There are %d (not %d) is* functions" % (count, expected)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(count, expected, err_msg)
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-17 23:43:43 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_excluding_predicates(self):
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.isbuiltin, 'sys.exit')
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.isbuiltin, '[].append')
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.iscode, 'mod.spam.func_code')
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.isframe, 'tb.tb_frame')
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.isfunction, 'mod.spam')
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.ismethod, 'mod.StupidGit.abuse')
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.ismethod, 'git.argue')
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.ismodule, 'mod')
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.istraceback, 'tb')
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.isdatadescriptor, '__builtin__.file.closed')
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.isdatadescriptor, '__builtin__.file.softspace')
|
2008-02-17 23:43:43 -04:00
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.isgenerator, '(x for x in xrange(2))')
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.isgeneratorfunction, 'generator_function_example')
|
2006-07-27 20:43:15 -03:00
|
|
|
if hasattr(types, 'GetSetDescriptorType'):
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.isgetsetdescriptor,
|
|
|
|
'type(tb.tb_frame).f_locals')
|
|
|
|
else:
|
2009-06-30 19:57:08 -03:00
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(inspect.isgetsetdescriptor(type(tb.tb_frame).f_locals))
|
2006-07-27 20:43:15 -03:00
|
|
|
if hasattr(types, 'MemberDescriptorType'):
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.ismemberdescriptor, 'datetime.timedelta.days')
|
|
|
|
else:
|
2009-06-30 19:57:08 -03:00
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(inspect.ismemberdescriptor(datetime.timedelta.days))
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_isroutine(self):
|
2009-06-30 19:57:08 -03:00
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(inspect.isroutine(mod.spam))
|
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(inspect.isroutine([].count))
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-01-17 18:27:54 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_isclass(self):
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.isclass, 'mod.StupidGit')
|
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(inspect.isclass(list))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class newstyle(object): pass
|
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(inspect.isclass(newstyle))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class CustomGetattr(object):
|
|
|
|
def __getattr__(self, attr):
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(inspect.isclass(CustomGetattr()))
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-13 19:39:22 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_get_slot_members(self):
|
|
|
|
class C(object):
|
|
|
|
__slots__ = ("a", "b")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x = C()
|
|
|
|
x.a = 42
|
|
|
|
members = dict(inspect.getmembers(x))
|
2010-01-23 19:04:36 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn('a', members)
|
|
|
|
self.assertNotIn('b', members)
|
2009-01-13 19:39:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-15 00:06:55 -03:00
|
|
|
def test_isabstract(self):
|
|
|
|
from abc import ABCMeta, abstractmethod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class AbstractClassExample(object):
|
|
|
|
__metaclass__ = ABCMeta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@abstractmethod
|
|
|
|
def foo(self):
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ClassExample(AbstractClassExample):
|
|
|
|
def foo(self):
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a = ClassExample()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Test general behaviour.
|
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(inspect.isabstract(AbstractClassExample))
|
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(inspect.isabstract(ClassExample))
|
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(inspect.isabstract(a))
|
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(inspect.isabstract(int))
|
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(inspect.isabstract(5))
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-13 19:39:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
class TestInterpreterStack(IsTestBase):
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
|
|
|
|
unittest.TestCase.__init__(self, *args, **kwargs)
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
git.abuse(7, 8, 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_abuse_done(self):
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.istraceback, 'git.ex[2]')
|
|
|
|
self.istest(inspect.isframe, 'mod.fr')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_stack(self):
|
2009-06-30 19:57:08 -03:00
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(len(mod.st) >= 5)
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mod.st[0][1:],
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
(modfile, 16, 'eggs', [' st = inspect.stack()\n'], 0))
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mod.st[1][1:],
|
|
|
|
(modfile, 9, 'spam', [' eggs(b + d, c + f)\n'], 0))
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mod.st[2][1:],
|
|
|
|
(modfile, 43, 'argue', [' spam(a, b, c)\n'], 0))
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(mod.st[3][1:],
|
|
|
|
(modfile, 39, 'abuse', [' self.argue(a, b, c)\n'], 0))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_trace(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(git.tr), 3)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(git.tr[0][1:], (modfile, 43, 'argue',
|
|
|
|
[' spam(a, b, c)\n'], 0))
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(git.tr[1][1:], (modfile, 9, 'spam',
|
|
|
|
[' eggs(b + d, c + f)\n'], 0))
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(git.tr[2][1:], (modfile, 18, 'eggs',
|
2010-02-03 12:50:14 -04:00
|
|
|
[' q = y // 0\n'], 0))
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_frame(self):
|
|
|
|
args, varargs, varkw, locals = inspect.getargvalues(mod.fr)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(args, ['x', 'y'])
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(varargs, None)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(varkw, None)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(locals, {'x': 11, 'p': 11, 'y': 14})
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.formatargvalues(args, varargs, varkw, locals),
|
|
|
|
'(x=11, y=14)')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_previous_frame(self):
|
|
|
|
args, varargs, varkw, locals = inspect.getargvalues(mod.fr.f_back)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(args, ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', ['e', ['f']]])
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(varargs, 'g')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(varkw, 'h')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.formatargvalues(args, varargs, varkw, locals),
|
|
|
|
'(a=7, b=8, c=9, d=3, (e=4, (f=5,)), *g=(), **h={})')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class GetSourceBase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|
|
|
# Subclasses must override.
|
|
|
|
fodderFile = None
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
|
|
|
|
unittest.TestCase.__init__(self, *args, **kwargs)
|
|
|
|
|
2009-05-28 02:58:44 -03:00
|
|
|
with open(inspect.getsourcefile(self.fodderFile)) as fp:
|
|
|
|
self.source = fp.read()
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def sourcerange(self, top, bottom):
|
|
|
|
lines = self.source.split("\n")
|
|
|
|
return "\n".join(lines[top-1:bottom]) + "\n"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assertSourceEqual(self, obj, top, bottom):
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getsource(obj),
|
|
|
|
self.sourcerange(top, bottom))
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
class TestRetrievingSourceCode(GetSourceBase):
|
|
|
|
fodderFile = mod
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_getclasses(self):
|
|
|
|
classes = inspect.getmembers(mod, inspect.isclass)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(classes,
|
|
|
|
[('FesteringGob', mod.FesteringGob),
|
|
|
|
('MalodorousPervert', mod.MalodorousPervert),
|
|
|
|
('ParrotDroppings', mod.ParrotDroppings),
|
|
|
|
('StupidGit', mod.StupidGit)])
|
|
|
|
tree = inspect.getclasstree([cls[1] for cls in classes], 1)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(tree,
|
|
|
|
[(mod.ParrotDroppings, ()),
|
|
|
|
(mod.StupidGit, ()),
|
|
|
|
[(mod.MalodorousPervert, (mod.StupidGit,)),
|
|
|
|
[(mod.FesteringGob, (mod.MalodorousPervert,
|
|
|
|
mod.ParrotDroppings))
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
])
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_getfunctions(self):
|
|
|
|
functions = inspect.getmembers(mod, inspect.isfunction)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(functions, [('eggs', mod.eggs),
|
|
|
|
('spam', mod.spam)])
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-22 20:24:49 -04:00
|
|
|
@unittest.skipIf(sys.flags.optimize >= 2,
|
|
|
|
"Docstrings are omitted with -O2 and above")
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_getdoc(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getdoc(mod), 'A module docstring.')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getdoc(mod.StupidGit),
|
|
|
|
'A longer,\n\nindented\n\ndocstring.')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getdoc(git.abuse),
|
|
|
|
'Another\n\ndocstring\n\ncontaining\n\ntabs')
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-07 12:59:10 -03:00
|
|
|
def test_cleandoc(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.cleandoc('An\n indented\n docstring.'),
|
|
|
|
'An\nindented\ndocstring.')
|
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_getcomments(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getcomments(mod), '# line 1\n')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getcomments(mod.StupidGit), '# line 20\n')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_getmodule(self):
|
2006-09-07 07:50:34 -03:00
|
|
|
# Check actual module
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getmodule(mod), mod)
|
|
|
|
# Check class (uses __module__ attribute)
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getmodule(mod.StupidGit), mod)
|
2006-09-07 07:50:34 -03:00
|
|
|
# Check a method (no __module__ attribute, falls back to filename)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getmodule(mod.StupidGit.abuse), mod)
|
|
|
|
# Do it again (check the caching isn't broken)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getmodule(mod.StupidGit.abuse), mod)
|
|
|
|
# Check a builtin
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getmodule(str), sys.modules["__builtin__"])
|
|
|
|
# Check filename override
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getmodule(None, modfile), mod)
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_getsource(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(git.abuse, 29, 39)
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod.StupidGit, 21, 46)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_getsourcefile(self):
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getsourcefile(mod.spam), modfile)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getsourcefile(git.abuse), modfile)
|
2010-06-16 22:36:52 -03:00
|
|
|
fn = "_non_existing_filename_used_for_sourcefile_test.py"
|
|
|
|
co = compile("None", fn, "exec")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getsourcefile(co), None)
|
|
|
|
linecache.cache[co.co_filename] = (1, None, "None", co.co_filename)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getsourcefile(co), fn)
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_getfile(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getfile(mod.StupidGit), mod.__file__)
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-10 16:03:29 -03:00
|
|
|
def test_getmodule_recursion(self):
|
2007-11-27 17:34:01 -04:00
|
|
|
from types import ModuleType
|
2006-07-10 16:03:29 -03:00
|
|
|
name = '__inspect_dummy'
|
2007-11-27 17:34:01 -04:00
|
|
|
m = sys.modules[name] = ModuleType(name)
|
2006-07-10 18:11:49 -03:00
|
|
|
m.__file__ = "<string>" # hopefully not a real filename...
|
2006-07-10 16:03:29 -03:00
|
|
|
m.__loader__ = "dummy" # pretend the filename is understood by a loader
|
|
|
|
exec "def x(): pass" in m.__dict__
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getsourcefile(m.x.func_code), '<string>')
|
|
|
|
del sys.modules[name]
|
2006-07-20 12:54:16 -03:00
|
|
|
inspect.getmodule(compile('a=10','','single'))
|
2006-07-10 16:03:29 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-11 17:53:11 -03:00
|
|
|
def test_proceed_with_fake_filename(self):
|
|
|
|
'''doctest monkeypatches linecache to enable inspection'''
|
|
|
|
fn, source = '<test>', 'def x(): pass\n'
|
|
|
|
getlines = linecache.getlines
|
|
|
|
def monkey(filename, module_globals=None):
|
|
|
|
if filename == fn:
|
|
|
|
return source.splitlines(True)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
return getlines(filename, module_globals)
|
|
|
|
linecache.getlines = monkey
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
ns = {}
|
|
|
|
exec compile(source, fn, 'single') in ns
|
|
|
|
inspect.getsource(ns["x"])
|
|
|
|
finally:
|
|
|
|
linecache.getlines = getlines
|
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
class TestDecorators(GetSourceBase):
|
|
|
|
fodderFile = mod2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_wrapped_decorator(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.wrapped, 14, 17)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_replacing_decorator(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.gone, 9, 10)
|
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
class TestOneliners(GetSourceBase):
|
|
|
|
fodderFile = mod2
|
|
|
|
def test_oneline_lambda(self):
|
|
|
|
# Test inspect.getsource with a one-line lambda function.
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.oll, 25, 25)
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_threeline_lambda(self):
|
|
|
|
# Test inspect.getsource with a three-line lambda function,
|
|
|
|
# where the second and third lines are _not_ indented.
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.tll, 28, 30)
|
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_twoline_indented_lambda(self):
|
|
|
|
# Test inspect.getsource with a two-line lambda function,
|
|
|
|
# where the second line _is_ indented.
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.tlli, 33, 34)
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_onelinefunc(self):
|
|
|
|
# Test inspect.getsource with a regular one-line function.
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.onelinefunc, 37, 37)
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_manyargs(self):
|
|
|
|
# Test inspect.getsource with a regular function where
|
|
|
|
# the arguments are on two lines and _not_ indented and
|
|
|
|
# the body on the second line with the last arguments.
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.manyargs, 40, 41)
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_twolinefunc(self):
|
|
|
|
# Test inspect.getsource with a regular function where
|
|
|
|
# the body is on two lines, following the argument list and
|
|
|
|
# continued on the next line by a \\.
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.twolinefunc, 44, 45)
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_lambda_in_list(self):
|
|
|
|
# Test inspect.getsource with a one-line lambda function
|
|
|
|
# defined in a list, indented.
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.a[1], 49, 49)
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:46:28 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_anonymous(self):
|
|
|
|
# Test inspect.getsource with a lambda function defined
|
|
|
|
# as argument to another function.
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.anonymous, 55, 55)
|
|
|
|
|
2005-03-12 12:37:11 -04:00
|
|
|
class TestBuggyCases(GetSourceBase):
|
|
|
|
fodderFile = mod2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_with_comment(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.with_comment, 58, 59)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_multiline_sig(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.multiline_sig[0], 63, 64)
|
|
|
|
|
2005-09-25 08:45:45 -03:00
|
|
|
def test_nested_class(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.func69().func71, 71, 72)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_one_liner_followed_by_non_name(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.func77, 77, 77)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_one_liner_dedent_non_name(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.cls82.func83, 83, 83)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_with_comment_instead_of_docstring(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.func88, 88, 90)
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-14 18:34:08 -03:00
|
|
|
def test_method_in_dynamic_class(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertSourceEqual(mod2.method_in_dynamic_class, 95, 97)
|
|
|
|
|
2009-05-14 13:12:57 -03:00
|
|
|
@unittest.skipIf(
|
|
|
|
not hasattr(unicodedata, '__file__') or
|
|
|
|
unicodedata.__file__[-4:] in (".pyc", ".pyo"),
|
|
|
|
"unicodedata is not an external binary module")
|
2009-05-13 14:14:11 -03:00
|
|
|
def test_findsource_binary(self):
|
2009-05-14 13:12:57 -03:00
|
|
|
self.assertRaises(IOError, inspect.getsource, unicodedata)
|
|
|
|
self.assertRaises(IOError, inspect.findsource, unicodedata)
|
2009-05-13 14:14:11 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-16 22:36:52 -03:00
|
|
|
def test_findsource_code_in_linecache(self):
|
|
|
|
lines = ["x=1"]
|
|
|
|
co = compile(lines[0], "_dynamically_created_file", "exec")
|
|
|
|
self.assertRaises(IOError, inspect.findsource, co)
|
|
|
|
self.assertRaises(IOError, inspect.getsource, co)
|
|
|
|
linecache.cache[co.co_filename] = (1, None, lines, co.co_filename)
|
2010-11-21 09:34:58 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.findsource(co), (lines,0))
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.getsource(co), lines[0])
|
2010-06-16 22:36:52 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2011-12-21 05:16:14 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class _BrokenDataDescriptor(object):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
A broken data descriptor. See bug #1785.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
def __get__(*args):
|
|
|
|
raise AssertionError("should not __get__ data descriptors")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __set__(*args):
|
|
|
|
raise RuntimeError
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __getattr__(*args):
|
|
|
|
raise AssertionError("should not __getattr__ data descriptors")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class _BrokenMethodDescriptor(object):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
A broken method descriptor. See bug #1785.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
def __get__(*args):
|
|
|
|
raise AssertionError("should not __get__ method descriptors")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __getattr__(*args):
|
|
|
|
raise AssertionError("should not __getattr__ method descriptors")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
# Helper for testing classify_class_attrs.
|
New function classify_class_attrs(). As a number of SF bug reports
point out, pydoc doesn't tell you where class attributes were defined,
gets several new 2.2 features wrong, and isn't aware of some new features
checked in on Thursday <wink>. pydoc is hampered in part because
inspect.py has the same limitations. Alas, I can't think of a way to
fix this within the current architecture of inspect/pydoc: it's simply
not possible in 2.2 to figure out everything needed just from examining
the object you get back from class.attr. You also need the class
context, and the method resolution order, and tests against various things
that simply didn't exist before. OTOH, knowledge of how to do that is
getting quite complex, so doesn't belong in pydoc.
classify_class_attrs takes a different approach, analyzing all
the class attrs "at once", and returning the most interesting stuff for
each, all in one gulp. pydoc needs to be reworked to use this for
classes (instead of the current "filter dir(class) umpteen times against
assorted predicates" approach).
2001-09-22 23:00:29 -03:00
|
|
|
def attrs_wo_objs(cls):
|
|
|
|
return [t[:3] for t in inspect.classify_class_attrs(cls)]
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-21 05:16:14 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-01-07 12:01:32 -04:00
|
|
|
class TestClassesAndFunctions(unittest.TestCase):
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_classic_mro(self):
|
|
|
|
# Test classic-class method resolution order.
|
|
|
|
class A: pass
|
|
|
|
class B(A): pass
|
|
|
|
class C(A): pass
|
|
|
|
class D(B, C): pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expected = (D, B, A, C)
|
|
|
|
got = inspect.getmro(D)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(expected, got)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_newstyle_mro(self):
|
|
|
|
# The same w/ new-class MRO.
|
|
|
|
class A(object): pass
|
|
|
|
class B(A): pass
|
|
|
|
class C(A): pass
|
|
|
|
class D(B, C): pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expected = (D, B, C, A, object)
|
|
|
|
got = inspect.getmro(D)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(expected, got)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assertArgSpecEquals(self, routine, args_e, varargs_e = None,
|
|
|
|
varkw_e = None, defaults_e = None,
|
|
|
|
formatted = None):
|
|
|
|
args, varargs, varkw, defaults = inspect.getargspec(routine)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(args, args_e)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(varargs, varargs_e)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(varkw, varkw_e)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(defaults, defaults_e)
|
|
|
|
if formatted is not None:
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(inspect.formatargspec(args, varargs, varkw, defaults),
|
|
|
|
formatted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_getargspec(self):
|
|
|
|
self.assertArgSpecEquals(mod.eggs, ['x', 'y'], formatted = '(x, y)')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertArgSpecEquals(mod.spam,
|
|
|
|
['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', ['e', ['f']]],
|
|
|
|
'g', 'h', (3, (4, (5,))),
|
|
|
|
'(a, b, c, d=3, (e, (f,))=(4, (5,)), *g, **h)')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_getargspec_method(self):
|
|
|
|
class A(object):
|
|
|
|
def m(self):
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
self.assertArgSpecEquals(A.m, ['self'])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_getargspec_sublistofone(self):
|
2010-03-20 22:14:24 -03:00
|
|
|
with check_py3k_warnings(
|
|
|
|
("tuple parameter unpacking has been removed", SyntaxWarning),
|
|
|
|
("parenthesized argument names are invalid", SyntaxWarning)):
|
|
|
|
exec 'def sublistOfOne((foo,)): return 1'
|
|
|
|
self.assertArgSpecEquals(sublistOfOne, [['foo']])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exec 'def fakeSublistOfOne((foo)): return 1'
|
|
|
|
self.assertArgSpecEquals(fakeSublistOfOne, ['foo'])
|
2006-03-27 04:58:23 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-04-10 16:59:28 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _classify_test(self, newstyle):
|
|
|
|
"""Helper for testing that classify_class_attrs finds a bunch of
|
|
|
|
different kinds of attributes on a given class.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
if newstyle:
|
|
|
|
base = object
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
class base:
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class A(base):
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
def s(): pass
|
|
|
|
s = staticmethod(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def c(cls): pass
|
|
|
|
c = classmethod(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def getp(self): pass
|
|
|
|
p = property(getp)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def m(self): pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def m1(self): pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
datablob = '1'
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-21 05:16:14 -04:00
|
|
|
dd = _BrokenDataDescriptor()
|
|
|
|
md = _BrokenMethodDescriptor()
|
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
attrs = attrs_wo_objs(A)
|
2010-01-23 19:04:36 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('s', 'static method', A), attrs, 'missing static method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('c', 'class method', A), attrs, 'missing class method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('p', 'property', A), attrs, 'missing property')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('m', 'method', A), attrs, 'missing plain method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('m1', 'method', A), attrs, 'missing plain method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('datablob', 'data', A), attrs, 'missing data')
|
2011-12-21 05:16:14 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('md', 'method', A), attrs, 'missing method descriptor')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('dd', 'data', A), attrs, 'missing data descriptor')
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class B(A):
|
|
|
|
def m(self): pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attrs = attrs_wo_objs(B)
|
2010-01-23 19:04:36 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('s', 'static method', A), attrs, 'missing static method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('c', 'class method', A), attrs, 'missing class method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('p', 'property', A), attrs, 'missing property')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('m', 'method', B), attrs, 'missing plain method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('m1', 'method', A), attrs, 'missing plain method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('datablob', 'data', A), attrs, 'missing data')
|
2011-12-21 05:16:14 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('md', 'method', A), attrs, 'missing method descriptor')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('dd', 'data', A), attrs, 'missing data descriptor')
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class C(A):
|
|
|
|
def m(self): pass
|
|
|
|
def c(self): pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attrs = attrs_wo_objs(C)
|
2010-01-23 19:04:36 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('s', 'static method', A), attrs, 'missing static method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('c', 'method', C), attrs, 'missing plain method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('p', 'property', A), attrs, 'missing property')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('m', 'method', C), attrs, 'missing plain method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('m1', 'method', A), attrs, 'missing plain method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('datablob', 'data', A), attrs, 'missing data')
|
2011-12-21 05:16:14 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('md', 'method', A), attrs, 'missing method descriptor')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('dd', 'data', A), attrs, 'missing data descriptor')
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class D(B, C):
|
|
|
|
def m1(self): pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attrs = attrs_wo_objs(D)
|
2010-01-23 19:04:36 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('s', 'static method', A), attrs, 'missing static method')
|
2010-04-10 16:59:28 -03:00
|
|
|
if newstyle:
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('c', 'method', C), attrs, 'missing plain method')
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('c', 'class method', A), attrs, 'missing class method')
|
2010-01-23 19:04:36 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('p', 'property', A), attrs, 'missing property')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('m', 'method', B), attrs, 'missing plain method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('m1', 'method', D), attrs, 'missing plain method')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('datablob', 'data', A), attrs, 'missing data')
|
2011-12-21 05:16:14 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('md', 'method', A), attrs, 'missing method descriptor')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('dd', 'data', A), attrs, 'missing data descriptor')
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
New function classify_class_attrs(). As a number of SF bug reports
point out, pydoc doesn't tell you where class attributes were defined,
gets several new 2.2 features wrong, and isn't aware of some new features
checked in on Thursday <wink>. pydoc is hampered in part because
inspect.py has the same limitations. Alas, I can't think of a way to
fix this within the current architecture of inspect/pydoc: it's simply
not possible in 2.2 to figure out everything needed just from examining
the object you get back from class.attr. You also need the class
context, and the method resolution order, and tests against various things
that simply didn't exist before. OTOH, knowledge of how to do that is
getting quite complex, so doesn't belong in pydoc.
classify_class_attrs takes a different approach, analyzing all
the class attrs "at once", and returning the most interesting stuff for
each, all in one gulp. pydoc needs to be reworked to use this for
classes (instead of the current "filter dir(class) umpteen times against
assorted predicates" approach).
2001-09-22 23:00:29 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2010-04-10 16:59:28 -03:00
|
|
|
def test_classify_oldstyle(self):
|
|
|
|
"""classify_class_attrs finds static methods, class methods,
|
|
|
|
properties, normal methods, and data attributes on an old-style
|
|
|
|
class.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
self._classify_test(False)
|
New function classify_class_attrs(). As a number of SF bug reports
point out, pydoc doesn't tell you where class attributes were defined,
gets several new 2.2 features wrong, and isn't aware of some new features
checked in on Thursday <wink>. pydoc is hampered in part because
inspect.py has the same limitations. Alas, I can't think of a way to
fix this within the current architecture of inspect/pydoc: it's simply
not possible in 2.2 to figure out everything needed just from examining
the object you get back from class.attr. You also need the class
context, and the method resolution order, and tests against various things
that simply didn't exist before. OTOH, knowledge of how to do that is
getting quite complex, so doesn't belong in pydoc.
classify_class_attrs takes a different approach, analyzing all
the class attrs "at once", and returning the most interesting stuff for
each, all in one gulp. pydoc needs to be reworked to use this for
classes (instead of the current "filter dir(class) umpteen times against
assorted predicates" approach).
2001-09-22 23:00:29 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-04-10 16:59:28 -03:00
|
|
|
def test_classify_newstyle(self):
|
|
|
|
"""Just like test_classify_oldstyle, but for a new-style class.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
self._classify_test(True)
|
New function classify_class_attrs(). As a number of SF bug reports
point out, pydoc doesn't tell you where class attributes were defined,
gets several new 2.2 features wrong, and isn't aware of some new features
checked in on Thursday <wink>. pydoc is hampered in part because
inspect.py has the same limitations. Alas, I can't think of a way to
fix this within the current architecture of inspect/pydoc: it's simply
not possible in 2.2 to figure out everything needed just from examining
the object you get back from class.attr. You also need the class
context, and the method resolution order, and tests against various things
that simply didn't exist before. OTOH, knowledge of how to do that is
getting quite complex, so doesn't belong in pydoc.
classify_class_attrs takes a different approach, analyzing all
the class attrs "at once", and returning the most interesting stuff for
each, all in one gulp. pydoc needs to be reworked to use this for
classes (instead of the current "filter dir(class) umpteen times against
assorted predicates" approach).
2001-09-22 23:00:29 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2011-12-21 05:16:14 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_classify_builtin_types(self):
|
|
|
|
# Simple sanity check that all built-in types can have their
|
|
|
|
# attributes classified.
|
|
|
|
for name in dir(__builtin__):
|
|
|
|
builtin = getattr(__builtin__, name)
|
|
|
|
if isinstance(builtin, type):
|
|
|
|
inspect.classify_class_attrs(builtin)
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-18 12:39:01 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_getmembers_method(self):
|
2011-12-21 05:16:14 -04:00
|
|
|
# Old-style classes
|
2012-01-18 12:39:01 -04:00
|
|
|
class B:
|
|
|
|
def f(self):
|
|
|
|
pass
|
2011-12-21 05:16:14 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2012-01-18 12:39:01 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('f', B.f), inspect.getmembers(B))
|
|
|
|
# contrary to spec, ismethod() is also True for unbound methods
|
|
|
|
# (see #1785)
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('f', B.f), inspect.getmembers(B, inspect.ismethod))
|
|
|
|
b = B()
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('f', b.f), inspect.getmembers(b))
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('f', b.f), inspect.getmembers(b, inspect.ismethod))
|
2011-12-21 05:16:14 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# New-style classes
|
2012-01-18 12:39:01 -04:00
|
|
|
class B(object):
|
|
|
|
def f(self):
|
2011-12-21 05:16:14 -04:00
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-18 12:39:01 -04:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('f', B.f), inspect.getmembers(B))
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('f', B.f), inspect.getmembers(B, inspect.ismethod))
|
|
|
|
b = B()
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('f', b.f), inspect.getmembers(b))
|
|
|
|
self.assertIn(('f', b.f), inspect.getmembers(b, inspect.ismethod))
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
New function classify_class_attrs(). As a number of SF bug reports
point out, pydoc doesn't tell you where class attributes were defined,
gets several new 2.2 features wrong, and isn't aware of some new features
checked in on Thursday <wink>. pydoc is hampered in part because
inspect.py has the same limitations. Alas, I can't think of a way to
fix this within the current architecture of inspect/pydoc: it's simply
not possible in 2.2 to figure out everything needed just from examining
the object you get back from class.attr. You also need the class
context, and the method resolution order, and tests against various things
that simply didn't exist before. OTOH, knowledge of how to do that is
getting quite complex, so doesn't belong in pydoc.
classify_class_attrs takes a different approach, analyzing all
the class attrs "at once", and returning the most interesting stuff for
each, all in one gulp. pydoc needs to be reworked to use this for
classes (instead of the current "filter dir(class) umpteen times against
assorted predicates" approach).
2001-09-22 23:00:29 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-30 14:58:13 -03:00
|
|
|
class TestGetcallargsFunctions(unittest.TestCase):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# tuple parameters are named '.1', '.2', etc.
|
|
|
|
is_tuplename = re.compile(r'^\.\d+$').match
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assertEqualCallArgs(self, func, call_params_string, locs=None):
|
|
|
|
locs = dict(locs or {}, func=func)
|
|
|
|
r1 = eval('func(%s)' % call_params_string, None, locs)
|
|
|
|
r2 = eval('inspect.getcallargs(func, %s)' % call_params_string, None,
|
|
|
|
locs)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(r1, r2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assertEqualException(self, func, call_param_string, locs=None):
|
|
|
|
locs = dict(locs or {}, func=func)
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
eval('func(%s)' % call_param_string, None, locs)
|
|
|
|
except Exception, ex1:
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
self.fail('Exception not raised')
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
eval('inspect.getcallargs(func, %s)' % call_param_string, None,
|
|
|
|
locs)
|
|
|
|
except Exception, ex2:
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
self.fail('Exception not raised')
|
|
|
|
self.assertIs(type(ex1), type(ex2))
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(str(ex1), str(ex2))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def makeCallable(self, signature):
|
|
|
|
"""Create a function that returns its locals(), excluding the
|
|
|
|
autogenerated '.1', '.2', etc. tuple param names (if any)."""
|
2010-03-31 05:33:50 -03:00
|
|
|
with check_py3k_warnings(
|
|
|
|
("tuple parameter unpacking has been removed", SyntaxWarning),
|
|
|
|
quiet=True):
|
|
|
|
code = ("lambda %s: dict(i for i in locals().items() "
|
|
|
|
"if not is_tuplename(i[0]))")
|
|
|
|
return eval(code % signature, {'is_tuplename' : self.is_tuplename})
|
2010-03-30 14:58:13 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_plain(self):
|
|
|
|
f = self.makeCallable('a, b=1')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, 3')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'a=2')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'b=3, a=2')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, b=3')
|
|
|
|
# expand *iterable / **mapping
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '*(2,)')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '*[2]')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '*(2, 3)')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '*[2, 3]')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '**{"a":2}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'b=3, **{"a":2}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, **{"b":3}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '**{"b":3, "a":2}')
|
|
|
|
# expand UserList / UserDict
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '*UserList([2])')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '*UserList([2, 3])')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '**UserDict(a=2)')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, **UserDict(b=3)')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'b=2, **UserDict(a=3)')
|
|
|
|
# unicode keyword args
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '**{u"a":2}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'b=3, **{u"a":2}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, **{u"b":3}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '**{u"b":3, u"a":2}')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_varargs(self):
|
|
|
|
f = self.makeCallable('a, b=1, *c')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, 3')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, 3, 4')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '*(2,3,4)')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, *[3,4]')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, 3, *UserList([4])')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_varkw(self):
|
|
|
|
f = self.makeCallable('a, b=1, **c')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'a=2')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, b=3, c=4')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'b=3, a=2, c=4')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'c=4, **{"a":2, "b":3}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, c=4, **{"b":3}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'b=2, **{"a":3, "c":4}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '**UserDict(a=2, b=3, c=4)')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, c=4, **UserDict(b=3)')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'b=2, **UserDict(a=3, c=4)')
|
|
|
|
# unicode keyword args
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'c=4, **{u"a":2, u"b":3}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, c=4, **{u"b":3}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'b=2, **{u"a":3, u"c":4}')
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-28 19:32:31 -03:00
|
|
|
def test_varkw_only(self):
|
|
|
|
# issue11256:
|
|
|
|
f = self.makeCallable('**c')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'a=1')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'a=1, b=2')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'c=3, **{"a": 1, "b": 2}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '**UserDict(a=1, b=2)')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'c=3, **UserDict(a=1, b=2)')
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-30 14:58:13 -03:00
|
|
|
def test_tupleargs(self):
|
|
|
|
f = self.makeCallable('(b,c), (d,(e,f))=(0,[1,2])')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '(2,3)')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '[2,3]')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'UserList([2,3])')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '(2,3), (4,(5,6))')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '(2,3), (4,[5,6])')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '(2,3), [4,UserList([5,6])]')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_multiple_features(self):
|
|
|
|
f = self.makeCallable('a, b=2, (c,(d,e))=(3,[4,5]), *f, **g')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, 3, (4,[5,6]), 7')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, 3, *[(4,[5,6]), 7], x=8')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, 3, x=8, *[(4,[5,6]), 7]')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, x=8, *[3, (4,[5,6]), 7], y=9')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'x=8, *[2, 3, (4,[5,6])], y=9')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, 'x=8, *UserList([2, 3, (4,[5,6])]), '
|
|
|
|
'**{"y":9, "z":10}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualCallArgs(f, '2, x=8, *UserList([3, (4,[5,6])]), '
|
|
|
|
'**UserDict(y=9, z=10)')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_errors(self):
|
|
|
|
f0 = self.makeCallable('')
|
|
|
|
f1 = self.makeCallable('a, b')
|
|
|
|
f2 = self.makeCallable('a, b=1')
|
|
|
|
# f0 takes no arguments
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f0, '1')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f0, 'x=1')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f0, '1,x=1')
|
|
|
|
# f1 takes exactly 2 arguments
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f1, '')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f1, '1')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f1, 'a=2')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f1, 'b=3')
|
|
|
|
# f2 takes at least 1 argument
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f2, '')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f2, 'b=3')
|
|
|
|
for f in f1, f2:
|
|
|
|
# f1/f2 takes exactly/at most 2 arguments
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '2, 3, 4')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '1, 2, 3, a=1')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '2, 3, 4, c=5')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '2, 3, 4, a=1, c=5')
|
|
|
|
# f got an unexpected keyword argument
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, 'c=2')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '2, c=3')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '2, 3, c=4')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '2, c=4, b=3')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '**{u"\u03c0\u03b9": 4}')
|
|
|
|
# f got multiple values for keyword argument
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '1, a=2')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '1, **{"a":2}')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '1, 2, b=3')
|
|
|
|
# XXX: Python inconsistency
|
|
|
|
# - for functions and bound methods: unexpected keyword 'c'
|
|
|
|
# - for unbound methods: multiple values for keyword 'a'
|
|
|
|
#self.assertEqualException(f, '1, c=3, a=2')
|
|
|
|
f = self.makeCallable('(a,b)=(0,1)')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '1')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '[1]')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f, '(1,2,3)')
|
2011-03-28 19:32:31 -03:00
|
|
|
# issue11256:
|
|
|
|
f3 = self.makeCallable('**c')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f3, '1, 2')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqualException(f3, '1, 2, a=1, b=2')
|
2010-03-30 14:58:13 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestGetcallargsMethods(TestGetcallargsFunctions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def setUp(self):
|
|
|
|
class Foo(object):
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
self.cls = Foo
|
|
|
|
self.inst = Foo()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def makeCallable(self, signature):
|
|
|
|
assert 'self' not in signature
|
|
|
|
mk = super(TestGetcallargsMethods, self).makeCallable
|
|
|
|
self.cls.method = mk('self, ' + signature)
|
|
|
|
return self.inst.method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestGetcallargsUnboundMethods(TestGetcallargsMethods):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def makeCallable(self, signature):
|
|
|
|
super(TestGetcallargsUnboundMethods, self).makeCallable(signature)
|
|
|
|
return self.cls.method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assertEqualCallArgs(self, func, call_params_string, locs=None):
|
|
|
|
return super(TestGetcallargsUnboundMethods, self).assertEqualCallArgs(
|
|
|
|
*self._getAssertEqualParams(func, call_params_string, locs))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assertEqualException(self, func, call_params_string, locs=None):
|
|
|
|
return super(TestGetcallargsUnboundMethods, self).assertEqualException(
|
|
|
|
*self._getAssertEqualParams(func, call_params_string, locs))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _getAssertEqualParams(self, func, call_params_string, locs=None):
|
|
|
|
assert 'inst' not in call_params_string
|
|
|
|
locs = dict(locs or {}, inst=self.inst)
|
|
|
|
return (func, 'inst,' + call_params_string, locs)
|
|
|
|
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
def test_main():
|
2010-03-30 14:58:13 -03:00
|
|
|
run_unittest(
|
|
|
|
TestDecorators, TestRetrievingSourceCode, TestOneliners, TestBuggyCases,
|
|
|
|
TestInterpreterStack, TestClassesAndFunctions, TestPredicates,
|
|
|
|
TestGetcallargsFunctions, TestGetcallargsMethods,
|
|
|
|
TestGetcallargsUnboundMethods)
|
2004-12-12 12:20:22 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|
|
|
test_main()
|