ardupilot/libraries/APM_Control/AP_RollController.cpp

220 lines
8.7 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

/*
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
// Code by Jon Challinger
APM_Control: ROLL and PITCH controllers These changes reduce height variation in turns and improve robustness. the specific changes are: 1) Linked roll and pitch integrator protection to the final output value so that if final output is on upper limit, the integrator is prevented from increasing and vice-versa. This improves wind-up protection. 2) Modified rate feedback in roll and pitch controllers to use body rates rather than Euler or earth rates. 3) Changed the roll to pitch compensation to use measured roll angle and estimated airspeed to calculate the component of turn rate (assuming a level coordinated turn) around the pitch axis. This a mathematically correct calculation and will work over a range of bank angles and aircraft with minimal (if any) tuning required. 4) The integrator in the roll and pitch loop is clamped when the estimated speed is below the minimum FBW speed 5) The noise filter in the pitch and roll loop has been changed to use a FOH discretisation. This gives improved noise rejection and less phase loss when compared to the previous filter that used a ZOH or equivalent discretisation. This has been flown on the rascal in the SITL and on a X-8 with limited flight testing. Initial results have been encouraging with reduced height variation in turns. Compare to standard PIDS, the revised pitch and roll controllers allow the use of rate feedback (effectively the same as the old D term) without beating the servos to death. The bank angle compensation in the pitch loop works effectively over a much larger range of bank angles and requires minimal tuning compared to the old calculation. YAW CONTROLLER Currently testing the a 3-loop acceleration autopilot topology for the yaw loop with feed forward yaw rate for turn compensation. This 3-loop topology is commonly used in tactical skid to to turn missiles and is easy to tune. The following block diagram shows the general signal flow Note that the acceleration measurement has to pass through an integrator before it gets to the actuator. This is a important feature as it eliminates problems of high frequency noise and potential coupling with structural modes associated with direct feedback of measured acceleration to actuator. The high pass filter has been inserted to compensate for airspeed and bank angle measurement errors which will cause steady state errors in the calculation of the turn yaw rate. The yaw controller flies SITL well, but hasn't been flight tested yet. It can be configured either as a simple yaw damper, or the acceleration and integral term can be turned on to allow feedback control of lateral acceleration/sideslip. TO DO: Need to reduce number of tuning parameters and provide consistent naming Need to provide guidance on tuning these loops with definitions for all the gain terms. Need to check signs and units into and out of lateral loops. DESIGN DECISIONS PENDING: 1) Can we remove the noise filters? Provided the mpu6k noise filter is running they are of limited benefit given the 25Hz Nyquist frequency 2) If we do remove them and rely on the mpu6k noise filter, what is the apprporiate default cutoff frequency for plane use. 20Hz is probably OK for most setups, but some noisy/high vibration setups would require as low as 10Hz 3) The inverted flight logic looks like a crash waiting to happen. It's problematic to test and even if implemented correctly would still crash a plane with poor inverted flight capability. We should either implement it properly and fully tested or delete it.
2013-04-23 08:02:18 -03:00
// Modified by Paul Riseborough
//
#include <AP_HAL/AP_HAL.h>
#include "AP_RollController.h"
extern const AP_HAL::HAL& hal;
const AP_Param::GroupInfo AP_RollController::var_info[] = {
// @Param: TCONST
// @DisplayName: Roll Time Constant
// @Description: This controls the time constant in seconds from demanded to achieved bank angle. A value of 0.5 is a good default and will work with nearly all models. Advanced users may want to reduce this time to obtain a faster response but there is no point setting a time less than the aircraft can achieve.
// @Range: 0.4 1.0
// @Units: seconds
// @Increment: 0.1
// @User: Advanced
AP_GROUPINFO("TCONST", 0, AP_RollController, gains.tau, 0.5f),
2013-05-31 02:31:25 -03:00
// @Param: P
// @DisplayName: Proportional Gain
// @Description: This is the gain from bank angle error to aileron.
// @Range: 0.1 4.0
// @Increment: 0.1
// @User: User
AP_GROUPINFO("P", 1, AP_RollController, gains.P, 0.6f),
2013-05-31 02:31:25 -03:00
// @Param: D
// @DisplayName: Damping Gain
// @Description: This is the gain from roll rate to aileron. This adjusts the damping of the roll control loop. It has the same effect as RLL2SRV_D in the old PID controller but without the spikes in servo demands. This gain helps to reduce rolling in turbulence. It should be increased in 0.01 increments as too high a value can lead to a high frequency roll oscillation that could overstress the airframe.
// @Range: 0 0.1
// @Increment: 0.01
// @User: User
AP_GROUPINFO("D", 2, AP_RollController, gains.D, 0.02f),
2013-05-31 02:31:25 -03:00
// @Param: I
// @DisplayName: Integrator Gain
// @Description: This is the gain from the integral of bank angle to aileron. It has the same effect as RLL2SRV_I in the old PID controller. Increasing this gain causes the controller to trim out steady offsets due to an out of trim aircraft.
// @Range: 0 1.0
// @Increment: 0.05
// @User: User
AP_GROUPINFO("I", 3, AP_RollController, gains.I, 0.1f),
// @Param: RMAX
// @DisplayName: Maximum Roll Rate
// @Description: This sets the maximum roll rate that the controller will demand (degrees/sec). Setting it to zero disables the limit. If this value is set too low, then the roll can't keep up with the navigation demands and the plane will start weaving. If it is set too high (or disabled by setting to zero) then ailerons will get large inputs at the start of turns. A limit of 60 degrees/sec is a good default.
// @Range: 0 180
// @Units: degrees/second
// @Increment: 1
// @User: Advanced
AP_GROUPINFO("RMAX", 4, AP_RollController, gains.rmax, 0),
// @Param: IMAX
// @DisplayName: Integrator limit
// @Description: This limits the number of degrees of aileron in centi-degrees over which the integrator will operate. At the default setting of 3000 centi-degrees, the integrator will be limited to +- 30 degrees of servo travel. The maximum servo deflection is +- 45 centi-degrees, so the default value represents a 2/3rd of the total control throw which is adequate unless the aircraft is severely out of trim.
// @Range: 0 4500
// @Increment: 1
// @User: Advanced
AP_GROUPINFO("IMAX", 5, AP_RollController, gains.imax, 3000),
// @Param: FF
// @DisplayName: Feed forward Gain
// @Description: This is the gain from demanded rate to aileron output.
// @Range: 0.1 4.0
// @Increment: 0.1
// @User: User
AP_GROUPINFO("FF", 6, AP_RollController, gains.FF, 0.0f),
AP_GROUPEND
};
/*
internal rate controller, called by attitude and rate controller
public functions
*/
int32_t AP_RollController::_get_rate_out(float desired_rate, float scaler, bool disable_integrator)
{
uint32_t tnow = AP_HAL::millis();
uint32_t dt = tnow - _last_t;
if (_last_t == 0 || dt > 1000) {
dt = 0;
}
_last_t = tnow;
// Calculate equivalent gains so that values for K_P and K_I can be taken across from the old PID law
// No conversion is required for K_D
float ki_rate = gains.I * gains.tau;
float eas2tas = _ahrs.get_EAS2TAS();
float kp_ff = MAX((gains.P - gains.I * gains.tau) * gains.tau - gains.D , 0) / eas2tas;
float k_ff = gains.FF / eas2tas;
float delta_time = (float)dt * 0.001f;
APM_Control: ROLL and PITCH controllers These changes reduce height variation in turns and improve robustness. the specific changes are: 1) Linked roll and pitch integrator protection to the final output value so that if final output is on upper limit, the integrator is prevented from increasing and vice-versa. This improves wind-up protection. 2) Modified rate feedback in roll and pitch controllers to use body rates rather than Euler or earth rates. 3) Changed the roll to pitch compensation to use measured roll angle and estimated airspeed to calculate the component of turn rate (assuming a level coordinated turn) around the pitch axis. This a mathematically correct calculation and will work over a range of bank angles and aircraft with minimal (if any) tuning required. 4) The integrator in the roll and pitch loop is clamped when the estimated speed is below the minimum FBW speed 5) The noise filter in the pitch and roll loop has been changed to use a FOH discretisation. This gives improved noise rejection and less phase loss when compared to the previous filter that used a ZOH or equivalent discretisation. This has been flown on the rascal in the SITL and on a X-8 with limited flight testing. Initial results have been encouraging with reduced height variation in turns. Compare to standard PIDS, the revised pitch and roll controllers allow the use of rate feedback (effectively the same as the old D term) without beating the servos to death. The bank angle compensation in the pitch loop works effectively over a much larger range of bank angles and requires minimal tuning compared to the old calculation. YAW CONTROLLER Currently testing the a 3-loop acceleration autopilot topology for the yaw loop with feed forward yaw rate for turn compensation. This 3-loop topology is commonly used in tactical skid to to turn missiles and is easy to tune. The following block diagram shows the general signal flow Note that the acceleration measurement has to pass through an integrator before it gets to the actuator. This is a important feature as it eliminates problems of high frequency noise and potential coupling with structural modes associated with direct feedback of measured acceleration to actuator. The high pass filter has been inserted to compensate for airspeed and bank angle measurement errors which will cause steady state errors in the calculation of the turn yaw rate. The yaw controller flies SITL well, but hasn't been flight tested yet. It can be configured either as a simple yaw damper, or the acceleration and integral term can be turned on to allow feedback control of lateral acceleration/sideslip. TO DO: Need to reduce number of tuning parameters and provide consistent naming Need to provide guidance on tuning these loops with definitions for all the gain terms. Need to check signs and units into and out of lateral loops. DESIGN DECISIONS PENDING: 1) Can we remove the noise filters? Provided the mpu6k noise filter is running they are of limited benefit given the 25Hz Nyquist frequency 2) If we do remove them and rely on the mpu6k noise filter, what is the apprporiate default cutoff frequency for plane use. 20Hz is probably OK for most setups, but some noisy/high vibration setups would require as low as 10Hz 3) The inverted flight logic looks like a crash waiting to happen. It's problematic to test and even if implemented correctly would still crash a plane with poor inverted flight capability. We should either implement it properly and fully tested or delete it.
2013-04-23 08:02:18 -03:00
// Limit the demanded roll rate
if (gains.rmax && desired_rate < -gains.rmax) {
desired_rate = - gains.rmax;
} else if (gains.rmax && desired_rate > gains.rmax) {
desired_rate = gains.rmax;
}
// Get body rate vector (radians/sec)
float omega_x = _ahrs.get_gyro().x;
// Calculate the roll rate error (deg/sec) and apply gain scaler
float achieved_rate = ToDeg(omega_x);
float rate_error = (desired_rate - achieved_rate) * scaler;
APM_Control: ROLL and PITCH controllers These changes reduce height variation in turns and improve robustness. the specific changes are: 1) Linked roll and pitch integrator protection to the final output value so that if final output is on upper limit, the integrator is prevented from increasing and vice-versa. This improves wind-up protection. 2) Modified rate feedback in roll and pitch controllers to use body rates rather than Euler or earth rates. 3) Changed the roll to pitch compensation to use measured roll angle and estimated airspeed to calculate the component of turn rate (assuming a level coordinated turn) around the pitch axis. This a mathematically correct calculation and will work over a range of bank angles and aircraft with minimal (if any) tuning required. 4) The integrator in the roll and pitch loop is clamped when the estimated speed is below the minimum FBW speed 5) The noise filter in the pitch and roll loop has been changed to use a FOH discretisation. This gives improved noise rejection and less phase loss when compared to the previous filter that used a ZOH or equivalent discretisation. This has been flown on the rascal in the SITL and on a X-8 with limited flight testing. Initial results have been encouraging with reduced height variation in turns. Compare to standard PIDS, the revised pitch and roll controllers allow the use of rate feedback (effectively the same as the old D term) without beating the servos to death. The bank angle compensation in the pitch loop works effectively over a much larger range of bank angles and requires minimal tuning compared to the old calculation. YAW CONTROLLER Currently testing the a 3-loop acceleration autopilot topology for the yaw loop with feed forward yaw rate for turn compensation. This 3-loop topology is commonly used in tactical skid to to turn missiles and is easy to tune. The following block diagram shows the general signal flow Note that the acceleration measurement has to pass through an integrator before it gets to the actuator. This is a important feature as it eliminates problems of high frequency noise and potential coupling with structural modes associated with direct feedback of measured acceleration to actuator. The high pass filter has been inserted to compensate for airspeed and bank angle measurement errors which will cause steady state errors in the calculation of the turn yaw rate. The yaw controller flies SITL well, but hasn't been flight tested yet. It can be configured either as a simple yaw damper, or the acceleration and integral term can be turned on to allow feedback control of lateral acceleration/sideslip. TO DO: Need to reduce number of tuning parameters and provide consistent naming Need to provide guidance on tuning these loops with definitions for all the gain terms. Need to check signs and units into and out of lateral loops. DESIGN DECISIONS PENDING: 1) Can we remove the noise filters? Provided the mpu6k noise filter is running they are of limited benefit given the 25Hz Nyquist frequency 2) If we do remove them and rely on the mpu6k noise filter, what is the apprporiate default cutoff frequency for plane use. 20Hz is probably OK for most setups, but some noisy/high vibration setups would require as low as 10Hz 3) The inverted flight logic looks like a crash waiting to happen. It's problematic to test and even if implemented correctly would still crash a plane with poor inverted flight capability. We should either implement it properly and fully tested or delete it.
2013-04-23 08:02:18 -03:00
// Get an airspeed estimate - default to zero if none available
float aspeed;
if (!_ahrs.airspeed_estimate(&aspeed)) {
aspeed = 0.0f;
}
APM_Control: ROLL and PITCH controllers These changes reduce height variation in turns and improve robustness. the specific changes are: 1) Linked roll and pitch integrator protection to the final output value so that if final output is on upper limit, the integrator is prevented from increasing and vice-versa. This improves wind-up protection. 2) Modified rate feedback in roll and pitch controllers to use body rates rather than Euler or earth rates. 3) Changed the roll to pitch compensation to use measured roll angle and estimated airspeed to calculate the component of turn rate (assuming a level coordinated turn) around the pitch axis. This a mathematically correct calculation and will work over a range of bank angles and aircraft with minimal (if any) tuning required. 4) The integrator in the roll and pitch loop is clamped when the estimated speed is below the minimum FBW speed 5) The noise filter in the pitch and roll loop has been changed to use a FOH discretisation. This gives improved noise rejection and less phase loss when compared to the previous filter that used a ZOH or equivalent discretisation. This has been flown on the rascal in the SITL and on a X-8 with limited flight testing. Initial results have been encouraging with reduced height variation in turns. Compare to standard PIDS, the revised pitch and roll controllers allow the use of rate feedback (effectively the same as the old D term) without beating the servos to death. The bank angle compensation in the pitch loop works effectively over a much larger range of bank angles and requires minimal tuning compared to the old calculation. YAW CONTROLLER Currently testing the a 3-loop acceleration autopilot topology for the yaw loop with feed forward yaw rate for turn compensation. This 3-loop topology is commonly used in tactical skid to to turn missiles and is easy to tune. The following block diagram shows the general signal flow Note that the acceleration measurement has to pass through an integrator before it gets to the actuator. This is a important feature as it eliminates problems of high frequency noise and potential coupling with structural modes associated with direct feedback of measured acceleration to actuator. The high pass filter has been inserted to compensate for airspeed and bank angle measurement errors which will cause steady state errors in the calculation of the turn yaw rate. The yaw controller flies SITL well, but hasn't been flight tested yet. It can be configured either as a simple yaw damper, or the acceleration and integral term can be turned on to allow feedback control of lateral acceleration/sideslip. TO DO: Need to reduce number of tuning parameters and provide consistent naming Need to provide guidance on tuning these loops with definitions for all the gain terms. Need to check signs and units into and out of lateral loops. DESIGN DECISIONS PENDING: 1) Can we remove the noise filters? Provided the mpu6k noise filter is running they are of limited benefit given the 25Hz Nyquist frequency 2) If we do remove them and rely on the mpu6k noise filter, what is the apprporiate default cutoff frequency for plane use. 20Hz is probably OK for most setups, but some noisy/high vibration setups would require as low as 10Hz 3) The inverted flight logic looks like a crash waiting to happen. It's problematic to test and even if implemented correctly would still crash a plane with poor inverted flight capability. We should either implement it properly and fully tested or delete it.
2013-04-23 08:02:18 -03:00
// Multiply roll rate error by _ki_rate, apply scaler and integrate
// Scaler is applied before integrator so that integrator state relates directly to aileron deflection
// This means aileron trim offset doesn't change as the value of scaler changes with airspeed
APM_Control: ROLL and PITCH controllers These changes reduce height variation in turns and improve robustness. the specific changes are: 1) Linked roll and pitch integrator protection to the final output value so that if final output is on upper limit, the integrator is prevented from increasing and vice-versa. This improves wind-up protection. 2) Modified rate feedback in roll and pitch controllers to use body rates rather than Euler or earth rates. 3) Changed the roll to pitch compensation to use measured roll angle and estimated airspeed to calculate the component of turn rate (assuming a level coordinated turn) around the pitch axis. This a mathematically correct calculation and will work over a range of bank angles and aircraft with minimal (if any) tuning required. 4) The integrator in the roll and pitch loop is clamped when the estimated speed is below the minimum FBW speed 5) The noise filter in the pitch and roll loop has been changed to use a FOH discretisation. This gives improved noise rejection and less phase loss when compared to the previous filter that used a ZOH or equivalent discretisation. This has been flown on the rascal in the SITL and on a X-8 with limited flight testing. Initial results have been encouraging with reduced height variation in turns. Compare to standard PIDS, the revised pitch and roll controllers allow the use of rate feedback (effectively the same as the old D term) without beating the servos to death. The bank angle compensation in the pitch loop works effectively over a much larger range of bank angles and requires minimal tuning compared to the old calculation. YAW CONTROLLER Currently testing the a 3-loop acceleration autopilot topology for the yaw loop with feed forward yaw rate for turn compensation. This 3-loop topology is commonly used in tactical skid to to turn missiles and is easy to tune. The following block diagram shows the general signal flow Note that the acceleration measurement has to pass through an integrator before it gets to the actuator. This is a important feature as it eliminates problems of high frequency noise and potential coupling with structural modes associated with direct feedback of measured acceleration to actuator. The high pass filter has been inserted to compensate for airspeed and bank angle measurement errors which will cause steady state errors in the calculation of the turn yaw rate. The yaw controller flies SITL well, but hasn't been flight tested yet. It can be configured either as a simple yaw damper, or the acceleration and integral term can be turned on to allow feedback control of lateral acceleration/sideslip. TO DO: Need to reduce number of tuning parameters and provide consistent naming Need to provide guidance on tuning these loops with definitions for all the gain terms. Need to check signs and units into and out of lateral loops. DESIGN DECISIONS PENDING: 1) Can we remove the noise filters? Provided the mpu6k noise filter is running they are of limited benefit given the 25Hz Nyquist frequency 2) If we do remove them and rely on the mpu6k noise filter, what is the apprporiate default cutoff frequency for plane use. 20Hz is probably OK for most setups, but some noisy/high vibration setups would require as low as 10Hz 3) The inverted flight logic looks like a crash waiting to happen. It's problematic to test and even if implemented correctly would still crash a plane with poor inverted flight capability. We should either implement it properly and fully tested or delete it.
2013-04-23 08:02:18 -03:00
// Don't integrate if in stabilise mode as the integrator will wind up against the pilots inputs
if (!disable_integrator && ki_rate > 0) {
APM_Control: ROLL and PITCH controllers These changes reduce height variation in turns and improve robustness. the specific changes are: 1) Linked roll and pitch integrator protection to the final output value so that if final output is on upper limit, the integrator is prevented from increasing and vice-versa. This improves wind-up protection. 2) Modified rate feedback in roll and pitch controllers to use body rates rather than Euler or earth rates. 3) Changed the roll to pitch compensation to use measured roll angle and estimated airspeed to calculate the component of turn rate (assuming a level coordinated turn) around the pitch axis. This a mathematically correct calculation and will work over a range of bank angles and aircraft with minimal (if any) tuning required. 4) The integrator in the roll and pitch loop is clamped when the estimated speed is below the minimum FBW speed 5) The noise filter in the pitch and roll loop has been changed to use a FOH discretisation. This gives improved noise rejection and less phase loss when compared to the previous filter that used a ZOH or equivalent discretisation. This has been flown on the rascal in the SITL and on a X-8 with limited flight testing. Initial results have been encouraging with reduced height variation in turns. Compare to standard PIDS, the revised pitch and roll controllers allow the use of rate feedback (effectively the same as the old D term) without beating the servos to death. The bank angle compensation in the pitch loop works effectively over a much larger range of bank angles and requires minimal tuning compared to the old calculation. YAW CONTROLLER Currently testing the a 3-loop acceleration autopilot topology for the yaw loop with feed forward yaw rate for turn compensation. This 3-loop topology is commonly used in tactical skid to to turn missiles and is easy to tune. The following block diagram shows the general signal flow Note that the acceleration measurement has to pass through an integrator before it gets to the actuator. This is a important feature as it eliminates problems of high frequency noise and potential coupling with structural modes associated with direct feedback of measured acceleration to actuator. The high pass filter has been inserted to compensate for airspeed and bank angle measurement errors which will cause steady state errors in the calculation of the turn yaw rate. The yaw controller flies SITL well, but hasn't been flight tested yet. It can be configured either as a simple yaw damper, or the acceleration and integral term can be turned on to allow feedback control of lateral acceleration/sideslip. TO DO: Need to reduce number of tuning parameters and provide consistent naming Need to provide guidance on tuning these loops with definitions for all the gain terms. Need to check signs and units into and out of lateral loops. DESIGN DECISIONS PENDING: 1) Can we remove the noise filters? Provided the mpu6k noise filter is running they are of limited benefit given the 25Hz Nyquist frequency 2) If we do remove them and rely on the mpu6k noise filter, what is the apprporiate default cutoff frequency for plane use. 20Hz is probably OK for most setups, but some noisy/high vibration setups would require as low as 10Hz 3) The inverted flight logic looks like a crash waiting to happen. It's problematic to test and even if implemented correctly would still crash a plane with poor inverted flight capability. We should either implement it properly and fully tested or delete it.
2013-04-23 08:02:18 -03:00
//only integrate if gain and time step are positive and airspeed above min value.
if (dt > 0 && aspeed > float(aparm.airspeed_min)) {
float integrator_delta = rate_error * ki_rate * delta_time * scaler;
APM_Control: ROLL and PITCH controllers These changes reduce height variation in turns and improve robustness. the specific changes are: 1) Linked roll and pitch integrator protection to the final output value so that if final output is on upper limit, the integrator is prevented from increasing and vice-versa. This improves wind-up protection. 2) Modified rate feedback in roll and pitch controllers to use body rates rather than Euler or earth rates. 3) Changed the roll to pitch compensation to use measured roll angle and estimated airspeed to calculate the component of turn rate (assuming a level coordinated turn) around the pitch axis. This a mathematically correct calculation and will work over a range of bank angles and aircraft with minimal (if any) tuning required. 4) The integrator in the roll and pitch loop is clamped when the estimated speed is below the minimum FBW speed 5) The noise filter in the pitch and roll loop has been changed to use a FOH discretisation. This gives improved noise rejection and less phase loss when compared to the previous filter that used a ZOH or equivalent discretisation. This has been flown on the rascal in the SITL and on a X-8 with limited flight testing. Initial results have been encouraging with reduced height variation in turns. Compare to standard PIDS, the revised pitch and roll controllers allow the use of rate feedback (effectively the same as the old D term) without beating the servos to death. The bank angle compensation in the pitch loop works effectively over a much larger range of bank angles and requires minimal tuning compared to the old calculation. YAW CONTROLLER Currently testing the a 3-loop acceleration autopilot topology for the yaw loop with feed forward yaw rate for turn compensation. This 3-loop topology is commonly used in tactical skid to to turn missiles and is easy to tune. The following block diagram shows the general signal flow Note that the acceleration measurement has to pass through an integrator before it gets to the actuator. This is a important feature as it eliminates problems of high frequency noise and potential coupling with structural modes associated with direct feedback of measured acceleration to actuator. The high pass filter has been inserted to compensate for airspeed and bank angle measurement errors which will cause steady state errors in the calculation of the turn yaw rate. The yaw controller flies SITL well, but hasn't been flight tested yet. It can be configured either as a simple yaw damper, or the acceleration and integral term can be turned on to allow feedback control of lateral acceleration/sideslip. TO DO: Need to reduce number of tuning parameters and provide consistent naming Need to provide guidance on tuning these loops with definitions for all the gain terms. Need to check signs and units into and out of lateral loops. DESIGN DECISIONS PENDING: 1) Can we remove the noise filters? Provided the mpu6k noise filter is running they are of limited benefit given the 25Hz Nyquist frequency 2) If we do remove them and rely on the mpu6k noise filter, what is the apprporiate default cutoff frequency for plane use. 20Hz is probably OK for most setups, but some noisy/high vibration setups would require as low as 10Hz 3) The inverted flight logic looks like a crash waiting to happen. It's problematic to test and even if implemented correctly would still crash a plane with poor inverted flight capability. We should either implement it properly and fully tested or delete it.
2013-04-23 08:02:18 -03:00
// prevent the integrator from increasing if surface defln demand is above the upper limit
if (_last_out < -45) {
integrator_delta = MAX(integrator_delta , 0);
} else if (_last_out > 45) {
// prevent the integrator from decreasing if surface defln demand is below the lower limit
integrator_delta = MIN(integrator_delta, 0);
}
_pid_info.I += integrator_delta;
}
} else {
_pid_info.I = 0;
}
APM_Control: ROLL and PITCH controllers These changes reduce height variation in turns and improve robustness. the specific changes are: 1) Linked roll and pitch integrator protection to the final output value so that if final output is on upper limit, the integrator is prevented from increasing and vice-versa. This improves wind-up protection. 2) Modified rate feedback in roll and pitch controllers to use body rates rather than Euler or earth rates. 3) Changed the roll to pitch compensation to use measured roll angle and estimated airspeed to calculate the component of turn rate (assuming a level coordinated turn) around the pitch axis. This a mathematically correct calculation and will work over a range of bank angles and aircraft with minimal (if any) tuning required. 4) The integrator in the roll and pitch loop is clamped when the estimated speed is below the minimum FBW speed 5) The noise filter in the pitch and roll loop has been changed to use a FOH discretisation. This gives improved noise rejection and less phase loss when compared to the previous filter that used a ZOH or equivalent discretisation. This has been flown on the rascal in the SITL and on a X-8 with limited flight testing. Initial results have been encouraging with reduced height variation in turns. Compare to standard PIDS, the revised pitch and roll controllers allow the use of rate feedback (effectively the same as the old D term) without beating the servos to death. The bank angle compensation in the pitch loop works effectively over a much larger range of bank angles and requires minimal tuning compared to the old calculation. YAW CONTROLLER Currently testing the a 3-loop acceleration autopilot topology for the yaw loop with feed forward yaw rate for turn compensation. This 3-loop topology is commonly used in tactical skid to to turn missiles and is easy to tune. The following block diagram shows the general signal flow Note that the acceleration measurement has to pass through an integrator before it gets to the actuator. This is a important feature as it eliminates problems of high frequency noise and potential coupling with structural modes associated with direct feedback of measured acceleration to actuator. The high pass filter has been inserted to compensate for airspeed and bank angle measurement errors which will cause steady state errors in the calculation of the turn yaw rate. The yaw controller flies SITL well, but hasn't been flight tested yet. It can be configured either as a simple yaw damper, or the acceleration and integral term can be turned on to allow feedback control of lateral acceleration/sideslip. TO DO: Need to reduce number of tuning parameters and provide consistent naming Need to provide guidance on tuning these loops with definitions for all the gain terms. Need to check signs and units into and out of lateral loops. DESIGN DECISIONS PENDING: 1) Can we remove the noise filters? Provided the mpu6k noise filter is running they are of limited benefit given the 25Hz Nyquist frequency 2) If we do remove them and rely on the mpu6k noise filter, what is the apprporiate default cutoff frequency for plane use. 20Hz is probably OK for most setups, but some noisy/high vibration setups would require as low as 10Hz 3) The inverted flight logic looks like a crash waiting to happen. It's problematic to test and even if implemented correctly would still crash a plane with poor inverted flight capability. We should either implement it properly and fully tested or delete it.
2013-04-23 08:02:18 -03:00
// Scale the integration limit
float intLimScaled = gains.imax * 0.01f;
// Constrain the integrator state
_pid_info.I = constrain_float(_pid_info.I, -intLimScaled, intLimScaled);
APM_Control: ROLL and PITCH controllers These changes reduce height variation in turns and improve robustness. the specific changes are: 1) Linked roll and pitch integrator protection to the final output value so that if final output is on upper limit, the integrator is prevented from increasing and vice-versa. This improves wind-up protection. 2) Modified rate feedback in roll and pitch controllers to use body rates rather than Euler or earth rates. 3) Changed the roll to pitch compensation to use measured roll angle and estimated airspeed to calculate the component of turn rate (assuming a level coordinated turn) around the pitch axis. This a mathematically correct calculation and will work over a range of bank angles and aircraft with minimal (if any) tuning required. 4) The integrator in the roll and pitch loop is clamped when the estimated speed is below the minimum FBW speed 5) The noise filter in the pitch and roll loop has been changed to use a FOH discretisation. This gives improved noise rejection and less phase loss when compared to the previous filter that used a ZOH or equivalent discretisation. This has been flown on the rascal in the SITL and on a X-8 with limited flight testing. Initial results have been encouraging with reduced height variation in turns. Compare to standard PIDS, the revised pitch and roll controllers allow the use of rate feedback (effectively the same as the old D term) without beating the servos to death. The bank angle compensation in the pitch loop works effectively over a much larger range of bank angles and requires minimal tuning compared to the old calculation. YAW CONTROLLER Currently testing the a 3-loop acceleration autopilot topology for the yaw loop with feed forward yaw rate for turn compensation. This 3-loop topology is commonly used in tactical skid to to turn missiles and is easy to tune. The following block diagram shows the general signal flow Note that the acceleration measurement has to pass through an integrator before it gets to the actuator. This is a important feature as it eliminates problems of high frequency noise and potential coupling with structural modes associated with direct feedback of measured acceleration to actuator. The high pass filter has been inserted to compensate for airspeed and bank angle measurement errors which will cause steady state errors in the calculation of the turn yaw rate. The yaw controller flies SITL well, but hasn't been flight tested yet. It can be configured either as a simple yaw damper, or the acceleration and integral term can be turned on to allow feedback control of lateral acceleration/sideslip. TO DO: Need to reduce number of tuning parameters and provide consistent naming Need to provide guidance on tuning these loops with definitions for all the gain terms. Need to check signs and units into and out of lateral loops. DESIGN DECISIONS PENDING: 1) Can we remove the noise filters? Provided the mpu6k noise filter is running they are of limited benefit given the 25Hz Nyquist frequency 2) If we do remove them and rely on the mpu6k noise filter, what is the apprporiate default cutoff frequency for plane use. 20Hz is probably OK for most setups, but some noisy/high vibration setups would require as low as 10Hz 3) The inverted flight logic looks like a crash waiting to happen. It's problematic to test and even if implemented correctly would still crash a plane with poor inverted flight capability. We should either implement it properly and fully tested or delete it.
2013-04-23 08:02:18 -03:00
// Calculate the demanded control surface deflection
// Note the scaler is applied again. We want a 1/speed scaler applied to the feed-forward
// path, but want a 1/speed^2 scaler applied to the rate error path.
// This is because acceleration scales with speed^2, but rate scales with speed.
_pid_info.D = rate_error * gains.D * scaler;
_pid_info.P = desired_rate * kp_ff * scaler;
_pid_info.FF = desired_rate * k_ff * scaler;
_pid_info.desired = desired_rate;
_last_out = _pid_info.FF + _pid_info.P + _pid_info.D;
if (autotune.running && aspeed > aparm.airspeed_min) {
// let autotune have a go at the values
// Note that we don't pass the integrator component so we get
// a better idea of how much the base PD controller
// contributed
autotune.update(desired_rate, achieved_rate, _last_out);
}
_last_out += _pid_info.I;
APM_Control: ROLL and PITCH controllers These changes reduce height variation in turns and improve robustness. the specific changes are: 1) Linked roll and pitch integrator protection to the final output value so that if final output is on upper limit, the integrator is prevented from increasing and vice-versa. This improves wind-up protection. 2) Modified rate feedback in roll and pitch controllers to use body rates rather than Euler or earth rates. 3) Changed the roll to pitch compensation to use measured roll angle and estimated airspeed to calculate the component of turn rate (assuming a level coordinated turn) around the pitch axis. This a mathematically correct calculation and will work over a range of bank angles and aircraft with minimal (if any) tuning required. 4) The integrator in the roll and pitch loop is clamped when the estimated speed is below the minimum FBW speed 5) The noise filter in the pitch and roll loop has been changed to use a FOH discretisation. This gives improved noise rejection and less phase loss when compared to the previous filter that used a ZOH or equivalent discretisation. This has been flown on the rascal in the SITL and on a X-8 with limited flight testing. Initial results have been encouraging with reduced height variation in turns. Compare to standard PIDS, the revised pitch and roll controllers allow the use of rate feedback (effectively the same as the old D term) without beating the servos to death. The bank angle compensation in the pitch loop works effectively over a much larger range of bank angles and requires minimal tuning compared to the old calculation. YAW CONTROLLER Currently testing the a 3-loop acceleration autopilot topology for the yaw loop with feed forward yaw rate for turn compensation. This 3-loop topology is commonly used in tactical skid to to turn missiles and is easy to tune. The following block diagram shows the general signal flow Note that the acceleration measurement has to pass through an integrator before it gets to the actuator. This is a important feature as it eliminates problems of high frequency noise and potential coupling with structural modes associated with direct feedback of measured acceleration to actuator. The high pass filter has been inserted to compensate for airspeed and bank angle measurement errors which will cause steady state errors in the calculation of the turn yaw rate. The yaw controller flies SITL well, but hasn't been flight tested yet. It can be configured either as a simple yaw damper, or the acceleration and integral term can be turned on to allow feedback control of lateral acceleration/sideslip. TO DO: Need to reduce number of tuning parameters and provide consistent naming Need to provide guidance on tuning these loops with definitions for all the gain terms. Need to check signs and units into and out of lateral loops. DESIGN DECISIONS PENDING: 1) Can we remove the noise filters? Provided the mpu6k noise filter is running they are of limited benefit given the 25Hz Nyquist frequency 2) If we do remove them and rely on the mpu6k noise filter, what is the apprporiate default cutoff frequency for plane use. 20Hz is probably OK for most setups, but some noisy/high vibration setups would require as low as 10Hz 3) The inverted flight logic looks like a crash waiting to happen. It's problematic to test and even if implemented correctly would still crash a plane with poor inverted flight capability. We should either implement it properly and fully tested or delete it.
2013-04-23 08:02:18 -03:00
// Convert to centi-degrees and constrain
return constrain_float(_last_out * 100, -4500, 4500);
}
/*
Function returns an equivalent elevator deflection in centi-degrees in the range from -4500 to 4500
A positive demand is up
Inputs are:
1) desired roll rate in degrees/sec
2) control gain scaler = scaling_speed / aspeed
*/
int32_t AP_RollController::get_rate_out(float desired_rate, float scaler)
{
return _get_rate_out(desired_rate, scaler, false);
}
/*
Function returns an equivalent elevator deflection in centi-degrees in the range from -4500 to 4500
A positive demand is up
Inputs are:
1) demanded bank angle in centi-degrees
2) control gain scaler = scaling_speed / aspeed
3) boolean which is true when stabilise mode is active
4) minimum FBW airspeed (metres/sec)
*/
int32_t AP_RollController::get_servo_out(int32_t angle_err, float scaler, bool disable_integrator)
{
if (gains.tau < 0.1f) {
gains.tau.set(0.1f);
}
// Calculate the desired roll rate (deg/sec) from the angle error
float desired_rate = angle_err * 0.01f / gains.tau;
return _get_rate_out(desired_rate, scaler, disable_integrator);
}
void AP_RollController::reset_I()
{
_pid_info.I = 0;
}