Patch #1521817: The index range checking on ctypes arrays containing

exactly one element is enabled again.
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Heller 2006-07-14 17:51:14 +00:00
parent 9f902470da
commit ce049a0aef
3 changed files with 12 additions and 75 deletions

View File

@ -46,70 +46,5 @@ class VarSizeTest(unittest.TestCase):
self.failUnlessRaises(IndexError, array.__setitem__, -1, None)
self.failUnlessRaises(IndexError, array.__getitem__, -1)
def test_varsized_array(self):
array = (c_int * 20)(20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29)
# no range checking is done on arrays with size == 1
varsize_array = (c_int * 1).from_address(addressof(array))
# __getitem__
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[0], 20)
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[1], 21)
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[2], 22)
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[3], 23)
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[4], 24)
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[5], 25)
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[6], 26)
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[7], 27)
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[8], 28)
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[9], 29)
# still, normal sequence of length one behaviour:
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[-1], 20)
self.failUnlessRaises(IndexError, lambda: varsize_array[-2])
# except for this one, which will raise MemoryError
self.failUnlessRaises(MemoryError, lambda: varsize_array[:])
# __setitem__
varsize_array[0] = 100
varsize_array[1] = 101
varsize_array[2] = 102
varsize_array[3] = 103
varsize_array[4] = 104
varsize_array[5] = 105
varsize_array[6] = 106
varsize_array[7] = 107
varsize_array[8] = 108
varsize_array[9] = 109
for i in range(10):
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[i], i + 100)
self.failUnlessEqual(array[i], i + 100)
# __getslice__
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[0:10], range(100, 110))
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[1:9], range(101, 109))
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[1:-1], [])
# __setslice__
varsize_array[0:10] = range(1000, 1010)
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[0:10], range(1000, 1010))
varsize_array[1:9] = range(1001, 1009)
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[1:9], range(1001, 1009))
def test_vararray_is_sane(self):
array = (c_int * 15)(20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29)
varsize_array = (c_int * 1).from_address(addressof(array))
varsize_array[:] = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
self.failUnlessEqual(array[:], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0])
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[0:10], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29])
array[:5] = [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]
self.failUnlessEqual(array[:], [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0])
self.failUnlessEqual(varsize_array[0:10], [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29])
if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main()

View File

@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ Library
Extension Modules
-----------------
- Patch #1521817: Index range checking on ctypes arrays containing
exactly one element enabled again. This allows iterating over these
arrays, without the need to check the array size before.
- Bug #1521375: When the code in ctypes.util.find_library was
run with root privileges, it could overwrite or delete
/dev/null in certain cases; this is now fixed.

View File

@ -3573,7 +3573,8 @@ Array_item(PyObject *_self, Py_ssize_t index)
int offset, size;
StgDictObject *stgdict;
if (self->b_length == 0 || index < 0 || (self->b_length > 1 && index >= self->b_length)) {
if (index < 0 || index >= self->b_length) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_IndexError,
"invalid index");
return NULL;
@ -3602,11 +3603,11 @@ Array_slice(PyObject *_self, Py_ssize_t ilow, Py_ssize_t ihigh)
if (ilow < 0)
ilow = 0;
else if (ilow > self->b_length && self->b_length != 1)
else if (ilow > self->b_length)
ilow = self->b_length;
if (ihigh < ilow)
ihigh = ilow;
else if (ihigh > self->b_length && self->b_length != 1)
else if (ihigh > self->b_length)
ihigh = self->b_length;
len = ihigh - ilow;
@ -3649,8 +3650,7 @@ Array_ass_item(PyObject *_self, Py_ssize_t index, PyObject *value)
}
stgdict = PyObject_stgdict((PyObject *)self);
if (self->b_length == 0 || index < 0
|| (self->b_length > 1 && index >= self->b_length)) {
if (index < 0 || index >= stgdict->length) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_IndexError,
"invalid index");
return -1;
@ -3677,19 +3677,17 @@ Array_ass_slice(PyObject *_self, Py_ssize_t ilow, Py_ssize_t ihigh, PyObject *va
if (ilow < 0)
ilow = 0;
else if (ilow > self->b_length && self->b_length != 1)
else if (ilow > self->b_length)
ilow = self->b_length;
if (ihigh < 0)
ihigh = 0;
if (ihigh < ilow)
ihigh = ilow;
else if (ihigh > self->b_length && self->b_length != 1)
else if (ihigh > self->b_length)
ihigh = self->b_length;
len = PySequence_Length(value);
if (self->b_length != 1 && len != ihigh - ilow) {
if (len != ihigh - ilow) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError,
"Can only assign sequence of same size");
return -1;