From b3dfc0ae5e68a9b01db4f55c02a30930078d3d4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fred Drake Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 04:57:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] - fix typo report by email, only 1.5 years late - fix several consistency nits relating to \method{...()} --- Doc/ref/ref3.tex | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Doc/ref/ref3.tex b/Doc/ref/ref3.tex index 505ae2ef69f..dd2a942b2a9 100644 --- a/Doc/ref/ref3.tex +++ b/Doc/ref/ref3.tex @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ separate items. The built-in functions \function{ord()}\bifuncindex{ord} convert between code units and nonnegative integers representing the Unicode ordinals as defined in the Unicode Standard 3.0. Conversion from and to other encodings are -possible through the Unicode method \method{encode} and the built-in +possible through the Unicode method \method{encode()} and the built-in function \function{unicode()}.\bifuncindex{unicode} \obindex{unicode} \index{character} @@ -1208,8 +1208,8 @@ By convention, \code{False} is used for false and \code{True} for true. There are no implied relationships among the comparison operators. The truth of \code{\var{x}==\var{y}} does not imply that \code{\var{x}!=\var{y}} -is false. Accordingly, when defining \method{__eq__}, one should also -define \method{__ne__} so that the operators will behave as expected. +is false. Accordingly, when defining \method{__eq__()}, one should also +define \method{__ne__()} so that the operators will behave as expected. There are no reflected (swapped-argument) versions of these methods (to be used when the left argument does not support the operation but @@ -1338,7 +1338,7 @@ The following methods only apply to new-style classes. \begin{methoddesc}[object]{__getattribute__}{self, name} Called unconditionally to implement attribute accesses for instances -of the class. If the class also defines \method{__getattr__}, the latter +of the class. If the class also defines \method{__getattr__()}, the latter will not be called unless \method{__getattribute__()} either calls it explicitly or raises an \exception{AttributeError}. This method should return the (computed) attribute @@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@ methods. For instance, to evaluate the expression \var{x}\code{+=}\var{y}, where \var{x} is an instance of a class that has an \method{__iadd__()} method, \code{\var{x}.__iadd__(\var{y})} is called. If \var{x} is an instance of a class that does not define a -\method{__iadd()} method, \code{\var{x}.__add__(\var{y})} and +\method{__iadd__()} method, \code{\var{x}.__add__(\var{y})} and \code{\var{y}.__radd__(\var{x})} are considered, as with the evaluation of \var{x}\code{+}\var{y}. \end{methoddesc} @@ -1988,10 +1988,10 @@ implemented at all. Below, \method{__op__()} and \method{__rop__()} are used to signify the generic method names corresponding to an operator; -\method{__iop__} is used for the corresponding in-place operator. For +\method{__iop__()} is used for the corresponding in-place operator. For example, for the operator `\code{+}', \method{__add__()} and \method{__radd__()} are used for the left and right variant of the -binary operator, and \method{__iadd__} for the in-place variant. +binary operator, and \method{__iadd__()} for the in-place variant. \item