From 0f5497e4c56f0f74ce22654deb7ddff87bd04784 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Peterson Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 22:16:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] remove trailing whitespace --- Include/pyfpe.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/Include/pyfpe.h b/Include/pyfpe.h index e957119dd52..f9a15e622ba 100644 --- a/Include/pyfpe.h +++ b/Include/pyfpe.h @@ -45,10 +45,10 @@ extern "C" { * Define macros for handling SIGFPE. * Lee Busby, LLNL, November, 1996 * busby1@llnl.gov - * + * ********************************************* * Overview of the system for handling SIGFPE: - * + * * This file (Include/pyfpe.h) defines a couple of "wrapper" macros for * insertion into your Python C code of choice. Their proper use is * discussed below. The file Python/pyfpe.c defines a pair of global @@ -59,33 +59,33 @@ extern "C" { * named fpectl. This module is standard in every respect. It can be loaded * either statically or dynamically as you choose, and like any other * Python module, has no effect until you import it. - * + * * In the general case, there are three steps toward handling SIGFPE in any * Python code: - * + * * 1) Add the *_PROTECT macros to your C code as required to protect * dangerous floating point sections. - * + * * 2) Turn on the inclusion of the code by adding the ``--with-fpectl'' * flag at the time you run configure. If the fpectl or other modules * which use the *_PROTECT macros are to be dynamically loaded, be * sure they are compiled with WANT_SIGFPE_HANDLER defined. - * + * * 3) When python is built and running, import fpectl, and execute * fpectl.turnon_sigfpe(). This sets up the signal handler and enables * generation of SIGFPE whenever an exception occurs. From this point * on, any properly trapped SIGFPE should result in the Python * FloatingPointError exception. - * + * * Step 1 has been done already for the Python kernel code, and should be * done soon for the NumPy array package. Step 2 is usually done once at * python install time. Python's behavior with respect to SIGFPE is not * changed unless you also do step 3. Thus you can control this new * facility at compile time, or run time, or both. - * - ******************************** + * + ******************************** * Using the macros in your code: - * + * * static PyObject *foobar(PyObject *self,PyObject *args) * { * .... @@ -94,17 +94,17 @@ extern "C" { * PyFPE_END_PROTECT(result) * .... * } - * + * * If a floating point error occurs in dangerous_op, foobar returns 0 (NULL), * after setting the associated value of the FloatingPointError exception to * "Error in foobar". ``Dangerous_op'' can be a single operation, or a block * of code, function calls, or any combination, so long as no alternate * return is possible before the PyFPE_END_PROTECT macro is reached. - * + * * The macros can only be used in a function context where an error return * can be recognized as signaling a Python exception. (Generally, most * functions that return a PyObject * will qualify.) - * + * * Guido's original design suggestion for PyFPE_START_PROTECT and * PyFPE_END_PROTECT had them open and close a local block, with a locally * defined jmp_buf and jmp_buf pointer. This would allow recursive nesting @@ -112,17 +112,17 @@ extern "C" { * variables need to be declared with the "volatile" type qualifier to keep * setjmp from corrupting their values. Some current implementations seem * to be more restrictive. For example, the HPUX man page for setjmp says - * + * * Upon the return from a setjmp() call caused by a longjmp(), the * values of any non-static local variables belonging to the routine * from which setjmp() was called are undefined. Code which depends on * such values is not guaranteed to be portable. - * + * * I therefore decided on a more limited form of nesting, using a counter * variable (PyFPE_counter) to keep track of any recursion. If an exception * occurs in an ``inner'' pair of macros, the return will apparently * come from the outermost level. - * + * */ #ifdef WANT_SIGFPE_HANDLER @@ -146,14 +146,14 @@ if (!PyFPE_counter++ && setjmp(PyFPE_jbuf)) { \ * this statement so that it gets executed *before* the unsafe expression * which we're trying to protect. That pretty well messes things up, * of course. - * + * * If the expression(s) you're trying to protect don't happen to return a * value, you will need to manufacture a dummy result just to preserve the * correct ordering of statements. Note that the macro passes the address * of its argument (so you need to give it something which is addressable). * If your expression returns multiple results, pass the last such result * to PyFPE_END_PROTECT. - * + * * Note that PyFPE_dummy returns a double, which is cast to int. * This seeming insanity is to tickle the Floating Point Unit (FPU). * If an exception has occurred in a preceding floating point operation,