From fd4d4e001d3f0391f43c1a5969236ef14aa09c88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Grob Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 16:56:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: suggestion to make it more "concise" --- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md b/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md index e5438f8cb5..de0ab22596 100644 --- a/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md +++ b/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md @@ -1,17 +1,29 @@ -Please use [PX4 Discuss](http://discuss.px4.io/) or [Discord](https://discord.gg/dronecode) to align on pull requests if necessary. You can then open draft pull requests to get early feedback. + -## Test data / coverage -How was it tested? What cases were covered? Logs uploaded to https://review.px4.io/ and screenshots of the important plot parts. +### Solved Problem +When ... I found that ... -## Additional context -Add any other related context or media. +Fixes #{Github issue ID} + +### Solution +- Add ... for ... +- Refactor ... + +### Alternatives +We could also ... + +### Test coverage +- Unit/integration test: ... +- Simulation/hardware testing logs: https://review.px4.io/ + +### Context +Related links, screenshot before/after, video