cpython

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Jonathan Protzenko	528bbab96f	GH-99108: Make vectorized versions of Blake2 available on x86, too (#125244 ) Accomplished by updating HACL* vendored code from hacl-star/hacl-star@a6a09496d9 to hacl-star/hacl-star@315a9e491d Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org> Co-authored-by: Zachary Ware <zach@python.org>	2024-10-17 15:08:43 +00:00
Jonathan Protzenko	325e9b8ef4	gh-99108: Add HACL* Blake2 implementation to hashlib (GH-119316) This replaces the existing hashlib Blake2 module with a single implementation that uses HACL\'s Blake2b/Blake2s implementations. We added support for all the modes exposed by the Python API, including tree hashing, leaf nodes, and so on. We ported and merged all of these changes upstream in HACL\, added test vectors based on Python's existing implementation, and exposed everything needed for hashlib. This was joint work done with @R1kM. See the PR for much discussion and benchmarking details. TL;DR: On many systems, 8-50% faster (!) than `libb2`, on some systems it appeared 10-20% slower than `libb2`.	2024-08-13 21:42:19 +00:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Jonathan Protzenko

528bbab96f

GH-99108: Make vectorized versions of Blake2 available on x86, too (#125244 )

Accomplished by updating HACL* vendored code from hacl-star/hacl-star@a6a09496d9 to hacl-star/hacl-star@315a9e491d

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
Co-authored-by: Zachary Ware <zach@python.org>

2024-10-17 15:08:43 +00:00

Jonathan Protzenko

325e9b8ef4

gh-99108: Add HACL* Blake2 implementation to hashlib (GH-119316)

This replaces the existing hashlib Blake2 module with a single implementation that uses HACL\*'s Blake2b/Blake2s implementations. We added support for all the modes exposed by the Python API, including tree hashing, leaf nodes, and so on. We ported and merged all of these changes upstream in HACL\*, added test vectors based on Python's existing implementation, and exposed everything needed for hashlib.

This was joint work done with @R1kM.

See the PR for much discussion and benchmarking details.   TL;DR: On many systems, 8-50% faster (!) than `libb2`, on some systems it appeared 10-20% slower than `libb2`.

2024-08-13 21:42:19 +00:00

2 Commits