From c6f2891af8e8900a92384ad140402bef894a5ca1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fred Drake Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:40:49 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Convert to PyUnit. --- Lib/test/test_cfgparser.py | 518 +++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 244 insertions(+), 274 deletions(-) diff --git a/Lib/test/test_cfgparser.py b/Lib/test/test_cfgparser.py index fa01627ef80..2409bf94e97 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_cfgparser.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_cfgparser.py @@ -1,303 +1,273 @@ import ConfigParser import StringIO +import unittest -from test.test_support import TestFailed, verify +from test import test_support -def basic(src): - print "Testing basic accessors..." - cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser() - sio = StringIO.StringIO(src) - cf.readfp(sio) - L = cf.sections() - L.sort() - verify(L == [r'Commented Bar', - r'Foo Bar', - r'Internationalized Stuff', - r'Long Line', - r'Section\with$weird%characters[' '\t', - r'Spaces', - r'Spacey Bar', - ], - "unexpected list of section names") +class TestCaseBase(unittest.TestCase): + def newconfig(self, defaults=None): + if defaults is None: + self.cf = self.config_class() + else: + self.cf = self.config_class(defaults) + return self.cf - # The use of spaces in the section names serves as a regression test for - # SourceForge bug #115357. - # http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&group_id=5470&bug_id=115357 - verify(cf.get('Foo Bar', 'foo', raw=1) == 'bar') - verify(cf.get('Spacey Bar', 'foo', raw=1) == 'bar') - verify(cf.get('Commented Bar', 'foo', raw=1) == 'bar') - verify(cf.get('Spaces', 'key with spaces', raw=1) == 'value') - verify(cf.get('Spaces', 'another with spaces', raw=1) == 'splat!') + def fromstring(self, string, defaults=None): + cf = self.newconfig(defaults) + sio = StringIO.StringIO(string) + cf.readfp(sio) + return cf - verify('__name__' not in cf.options("Foo Bar"), - '__name__ "option" should not be exposed by the API!') + def test_basic(self): + cf = self.fromstring( + "[Foo Bar]\n" + "foo=bar\n" + "[Spacey Bar]\n" + "foo = bar\n" + "[Commented Bar]\n" + "foo: bar ; comment\n" + "[Long Line]\n" + "foo: this line is much, much longer than my editor\n" + " likes it.\n" + "[Section\\with$weird%characters[\t]\n" + "[Internationalized Stuff]\n" + "foo[bg]: Bulgarian\n" + "foo=Default\n" + "foo[en]=English\n" + "foo[de]=Deutsch\n" + "[Spaces]\n" + "key with spaces : value\n" + "another with spaces = splat!\n" + ) + L = cf.sections() + L.sort() + eq = self.assertEqual + eq(L, [r'Commented Bar', + r'Foo Bar', + r'Internationalized Stuff', + r'Long Line', + r'Section\with$weird%characters[' '\t', + r'Spaces', + r'Spacey Bar', + ]) - # Make sure the right things happen for remove_option(); - # added to include check for SourceForge bug #123324: - verify(cf.remove_option('Foo Bar', 'foo'), - "remove_option() failed to report existance of option") - verify(not cf.has_option('Foo Bar', 'foo'), - "remove_option() failed to remove option") - verify(not cf.remove_option('Foo Bar', 'foo'), - "remove_option() failed to report non-existance of option" - " that was removed") - try: - cf.remove_option('No Such Section', 'foo') - except ConfigParser.NoSectionError: - pass - else: - raise TestFailed( - "remove_option() failed to report non-existance of option" - " that never existed") + # The use of spaces in the section names serves as a + # regression test for SourceForge bug #583248: + # http://www.python.org/sf/583248 + eq(cf.get('Foo Bar', 'foo'), 'bar') + eq(cf.get('Spacey Bar', 'foo'), 'bar') + eq(cf.get('Commented Bar', 'foo'), 'bar') + eq(cf.get('Spaces', 'key with spaces'), 'value') + eq(cf.get('Spaces', 'another with spaces'), 'splat!') - verify(cf.get('Long Line', 'foo', raw=1) == + self.failIf('__name__' in cf.options("Foo Bar"), + '__name__ "option" should not be exposed by the API!') + + # Make sure the right things happen for remove_option(); + # added to include check for SourceForge bug #123324: + self.failUnless(cf.remove_option('Foo Bar', 'foo'), + "remove_option() failed to report existance of option") + self.failIf(cf.has_option('Foo Bar', 'foo'), + "remove_option() failed to remove option") + self.failIf(cf.remove_option('Foo Bar', 'foo'), + "remove_option() failed to report non-existance of option" + " that was removed") + + self.assertRaises(ConfigParser.NoSectionError, + cf.remove_option, 'No Such Section', 'foo') + + eq(cf.get('Long Line', 'foo'), 'this line is much, much longer than my editor\nlikes it.') - -def case_sensitivity(): - print "Testing case sensitivity..." - cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser() - cf.add_section("A") - cf.add_section("a") - L = cf.sections() - L.sort() - verify(L == ["A", "a"]) - cf.set("a", "B", "value") - verify(cf.options("a") == ["b"]) - verify(cf.get("a", "b", raw=1) == "value", + def test_case_sensitivity(self): + cf = self.newconfig() + cf.add_section("A") + cf.add_section("a") + L = cf.sections() + L.sort() + eq = self.assertEqual + eq(L, ["A", "a"]) + cf.set("a", "B", "value") + eq(cf.options("a"), ["b"]) + eq(cf.get("a", "b"), "value", "could not locate option, expecting case-insensitive option names") - verify(cf.has_option("a", "b")) - cf.set("A", "A-B", "A-B value") - for opt in ("a-b", "A-b", "a-B", "A-B"): - verify(cf.has_option("A", opt), - "has_option() returned false for option which should exist") - verify(cf.options("A") == ["a-b"]) - verify(cf.options("a") == ["b"]) - cf.remove_option("a", "B") - verify(cf.options("a") == []) + self.failUnless(cf.has_option("a", "b")) + cf.set("A", "A-B", "A-B value") + for opt in ("a-b", "A-b", "a-B", "A-B"): + self.failUnless( + cf.has_option("A", opt), + "has_option() returned false for option which should exist") + eq(cf.options("A"), ["a-b"]) + eq(cf.options("a"), ["b"]) + cf.remove_option("a", "B") + eq(cf.options("a"), []) - # SF bug #432369: - cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser() - sio = StringIO.StringIO("[MySection]\nOption: first line\n\tsecond line\n") - cf.readfp(sio) - verify(cf.options("MySection") == ["option"]) - verify(cf.get("MySection", "Option") == "first line\nsecond line") + # SF bug #432369: + cf = self.fromstring( + "[MySection]\nOption: first line\n\tsecond line\n") + eq(cf.options("MySection"), ["option"]) + eq(cf.get("MySection", "Option"), "first line\nsecond line") - # SF bug #561822: - cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser(defaults={"key":"value"}) - cf.readfp(StringIO.StringIO("[section]\nnekey=nevalue\n")) - verify(cf.has_option("section", "Key")) + # SF bug #561822: + cf = self.fromstring("[section]\nnekey=nevalue\n", + defaults={"key":"value"}) + self.failUnless(cf.has_option("section", "Key")) -def boolean(src): - print "Testing interpretation of boolean Values..." - cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser() - sio = StringIO.StringIO(src) - cf.readfp(sio) - for x in range(1, 5): - verify(cf.getboolean('BOOLTEST', 't%d' % (x)) == 1) - for x in range(1, 5): - verify(cf.getboolean('BOOLTEST', 'f%d' % (x)) == 0) - for x in range(1, 5): - try: - cf.getboolean('BOOLTEST', 'e%d' % (x)) - except ValueError: - pass - else: - raise TestFailed( - "getboolean() failed to report a non boolean value") + def test_parse_errors(self): + self.newconfig() + self.parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError, + "[Foo]\n extra-spaces: splat\n") + self.parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError, + "[Foo]\n extra-spaces= splat\n") + self.parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError, + "[Foo]\noption-without-value\n") + self.parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError, + "[Foo]\n:value-without-option-name\n") + self.parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError, + "[Foo]\n=value-without-option-name\n") + self.parse_error(ConfigParser.MissingSectionHeaderError, + "No Section!\n") + def parse_error(self, exc, src): + sio = StringIO.StringIO(src) + self.assertRaises(exc, self.cf.readfp, sio) -def interpolation(src): - print "Testing value interpolation..." - cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser({"getname": "%(__name__)s"}) - sio = StringIO.StringIO(src) - cf.readfp(sio) - verify(cf.get("Foo", "getname") == "Foo") - verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar") == "something with interpolation (1 step)") - verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar9") - == "something with lots of interpolation (9 steps)") - verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar10") - == "something with lots of interpolation (10 steps)") - expect_get_error(cf, ConfigParser.InterpolationDepthError, "Foo", "bar11") + def test_query_errors(self): + cf = self.newconfig() + self.assertEqual(cf.sections(), [], + "new ConfigParser should have no defined sections") + self.failIf(cf.has_section("Foo"), + "new ConfigParser should have no acknowledged sections") + self.assertRaises(ConfigParser.NoSectionError, + cf.options, "Foo") + self.assertRaises(ConfigParser.NoSectionError, + cf.set, "foo", "bar", "value") + self.get_error(ConfigParser.NoSectionError, "foo", "bar") + cf.add_section("foo") + self.get_error(ConfigParser.NoOptionError, "foo", "bar") - # Now make sure we don't interpolate if we use RawConfigParser: - cf = ConfigParser.RawConfigParser({"getname": "%(__name__)s"}) - sio = StringIO.StringIO(src) - cf.readfp(sio) - verify(cf.get("Foo", "getname") == "%(__name__)s") - verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar") - == "something %(with1)s interpolation (1 step)") - verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar9") - == "something %(with9)s lots of interpolation (9 steps)") - verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar10") - == "something %(with10)s lots of interpolation (10 steps)") - verify(cf.get("Foo", "bar11") - == "something %(with11)s lots of interpolation (11 steps)") + def get_error(self, exc, section, option): + self.assertRaises(exc, self.cf.get, section, option) + def test_boolean(self): + cf = self.fromstring( + "[BOOLTEST]\n" + "T1=1\n" + "T2=TRUE\n" + "T3=True\n" + "T4=oN\n" + "T5=yes\n" + "F1=0\n" + "F2=FALSE\n" + "F3=False\n" + "F4=oFF\n" + "F5=nO\n" + "E1=2\n" + "E2=foo\n" + "E3=-1\n" + "E4=0.1\n" + "E5=FALSE AND MORE" + ) + for x in range(1, 5): + self.failUnless(cf.getboolean('BOOLTEST', 't%d' % x)) + self.failIf(cf.getboolean('BOOLTEST', 'f%d' % x)) + self.assertRaises(ValueError, + cf.getboolean, 'BOOLTEST', 'e%d' % x) -def parse_errors(): - print "Testing parse errors..." - expect_parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError, - """[Foo]\n extra-spaces: splat\n""") - expect_parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError, - """[Foo]\n extra-spaces= splat\n""") - expect_parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError, - """[Foo]\noption-without-value\n""") - expect_parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError, - """[Foo]\n:value-without-option-name\n""") - expect_parse_error(ConfigParser.ParsingError, - """[Foo]\n=value-without-option-name\n""") - expect_parse_error(ConfigParser.MissingSectionHeaderError, - """No Section!\n""") - - -def query_errors(): - print "Testing query interface..." - cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser() - verify(cf.sections() == [], - "new ConfigParser should have no defined sections") - verify(not cf.has_section("Foo"), - "new ConfigParser should have no acknowledged sections") - try: - cf.options("Foo") - except ConfigParser.NoSectionError, e: - pass - else: - raise TestFailed( - "Failed to catch expected NoSectionError from options()") - try: - cf.set("foo", "bar", "value") - except ConfigParser.NoSectionError, e: - pass - else: - raise TestFailed("Failed to catch expected NoSectionError from set()") - expect_get_error(cf, ConfigParser.NoSectionError, "foo", "bar") - cf.add_section("foo") - expect_get_error(cf, ConfigParser.NoOptionError, "foo", "bar") - - -def weird_errors(): - print "Testing miscellaneous error conditions..." - cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser() - cf.add_section("Foo") - try: + def test_weird_errors(self): + cf = self.newconfig() cf.add_section("Foo") - except ConfigParser.DuplicateSectionError, e: - pass - else: - raise TestFailed("Failed to catch expected DuplicateSectionError") + self.assertRaises(ConfigParser.DuplicateSectionError, + cf.add_section, "Foo") + + def test_write(self): + cf = self.fromstring( + "[Long Line]\n" + "foo: this line is much, much longer than my editor\n" + " likes it.\n" + "[DEFAULT]\n" + "foo: another very\n" + " long line" + ) + output = StringIO.StringIO() + cf.write(output) + self.assertEqual( + output.getvalue(), + "[DEFAULT]\n" + "foo = another very\n" + "\tlong line\n" + "\n" + "[Long Line]\n" + "foo = this line is much, much longer than my editor\n" + "\tlikes it.\n" + "\n" + ) + + # shared by subclasses + def get_interpolation_config(self): + return self.fromstring( + "[Foo]\n" + "bar=something %(with1)s interpolation (1 step)\n" + "bar9=something %(with9)s lots of interpolation (9 steps)\n" + "bar10=something %(with10)s lots of interpolation (10 steps)\n" + "bar11=something %(with11)s lots of interpolation (11 steps)\n" + "with11=%(with10)s\n" + "with10=%(with9)s\n" + "with9=%(with8)s\n" + "with8=%(with7)s\n" + "with7=%(with6)s\n" + "with6=%(with5)s\n" + "with5=%(with4)s\n" + "with4=%(with3)s\n" + "with3=%(with2)s\n" + "with2=%(with1)s\n" + "with1=with\n" + "\n" + "[Mutual Recursion]\n" + "foo=%(bar)s\n" + "bar=%(foo)s\n", + defaults={"getname": "%(__name__)s"}) -def expect_get_error(cf, exctype, section, option, raw=0): - try: - cf.get(section, option, raw=raw) - except exctype, e: - pass - else: - raise TestFailed("Failed to catch expected " + exctype.__name__) +class ConfigParserTestCase(TestCaseBase): + config_class = ConfigParser.ConfigParser + + def test_interpolation(self): + cf = self.get_interpolation_config() + eq = self.assertEqual + eq(cf.get("Foo", "getname"), "Foo") + eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar"), "something with interpolation (1 step)") + eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar9"), + "something with lots of interpolation (9 steps)") + eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar10"), + "something with lots of interpolation (10 steps)") + self.get_error(ConfigParser.InterpolationDepthError, "Foo", "bar11") -def expect_parse_error(exctype, src): - cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser() - sio = StringIO.StringIO(src) - try: - cf.readfp(sio) - except exctype, e: - pass - else: - raise TestFailed("Failed to catch expected " + exctype.__name__) +class RawConfigParserTestCase(TestCaseBase): + config_class = ConfigParser.RawConfigParser + + def test_interpolation(self): + cf = self.get_interpolation_config() + eq = self.assertEqual + eq(cf.get("Foo", "getname"), "%(__name__)s") + eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar"), + "something %(with1)s interpolation (1 step)") + eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar9"), + "something %(with9)s lots of interpolation (9 steps)") + eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar10"), + "something %(with10)s lots of interpolation (10 steps)") + eq(cf.get("Foo", "bar11"), + "something %(with11)s lots of interpolation (11 steps)") -# The long string literals present in the rest of the file screw up -# font-lock in Emacs/XEmacs, so this stuff needs to stay near the end -# of this file. +def test_main(): + suite = unittest.TestSuite() + suite.addTests([unittest.makeSuite(ConfigParserTestCase), + unittest.makeSuite(RawConfigParserTestCase)]) + test_support.run_suite(suite) -def write(src): - print "Testing writing of files..." - cf = ConfigParser.ConfigParser() - sio = StringIO.StringIO(src) - cf.readfp(sio) - output = StringIO.StringIO() - cf.write(output) - verify(output, """[DEFAULT] -foo = another very - long line - -[Long Line] -foo = this line is much, much longer than my editor - likes it. -""") - - -basic(r""" -[Foo Bar] -foo=bar -[Spacey Bar] -foo = bar -[Commented Bar] -foo: bar ; comment -[Long Line] -foo: this line is much, much longer than my editor - likes it. -[Section\with$weird%characters[""" '\t' r"""] -[Internationalized Stuff] -foo[bg]: Bulgarian -foo=Default -foo[en]=English -foo[de]=Deutsch -[Spaces] -key with spaces : value -another with spaces = splat! -""") -write("""[Long Line] -foo: this line is much, much longer than my editor - likes it. -[DEFAULT] -foo: another very - long line""") -case_sensitivity() -boolean(r""" -[BOOLTEST] -T1=1 -T2=TRUE -T3=True -T4=oN -T5=yes -F1=0 -F2=FALSE -F3=False -F4=oFF -F5=nO -E1=2 -E2=foo -E3=-1 -E4=0.1 -E5=FALSE AND MORE -""") -interpolation(r""" -[Foo] -bar=something %(with1)s interpolation (1 step) -bar9=something %(with9)s lots of interpolation (9 steps) -bar10=something %(with10)s lots of interpolation (10 steps) -bar11=something %(with11)s lots of interpolation (11 steps) -with11=%(with10)s -with10=%(with9)s -with9=%(with8)s -with8=%(with7)s -with7=%(with6)s -with6=%(with5)s -with5=%(with4)s -with4=%(with3)s -with3=%(with2)s -with2=%(with1)s -with1=with - -[Mutual Recursion] -foo=%(bar)s -bar=%(foo)s -""") -parse_errors() -query_errors() -weird_errors() +if __name__ == "__main__": + test_main()