mirror of https://github.com/python/cpython
extensive description of what's here
This commit is contained in:
parent
8b5e0fa862
commit
6c1504629f
|
@ -1,2 +1,84 @@
|
|||
Filesystem, RCS and CVS client and server classes
|
||||
=================================================
|
||||
|
||||
This directory contains various modules and classes that support
|
||||
remote file system operations
|
||||
remote file system operations.
|
||||
|
||||
rrcs.py Remote RCS client command line interface
|
||||
rrcs Script to put in your bin directory
|
||||
|
||||
rcvs.py Remote CVS client command line interface
|
||||
rcvs Script to put in your bin directory
|
||||
|
||||
sumtree.py Old demo for FSProxy
|
||||
cmptree.py First FSProxy client (used to sync from the Mac)
|
||||
|
||||
cvslib.py CVS admin files classes (used by rrcs)
|
||||
rcsclient.py Return an RCSProxyClient instance
|
||||
(has reasonable default server/port/directory)
|
||||
|
||||
FSProxy.py Filesystem interface classes
|
||||
RCSProxy.py RCS interface classes
|
||||
|
||||
client.py Client class
|
||||
server.py Server class
|
||||
|
||||
cmdfw.py CommandFrameWork class
|
||||
(used by rcvs, should be used by rrcs as well)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Client/Server operation
|
||||
-----------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The Client and Server classes implement a simple-minded RPC protocol,
|
||||
using Python's pickle module to transfer arguments, return values and
|
||||
exceptions with the most generality. The Server class is instantiated
|
||||
with a port number on which it should listen for requests; the Client
|
||||
class is instantiated with a host name and a port number where it
|
||||
should connect to. Once a client is connected, a TCP connection is
|
||||
maintained between client and server.
|
||||
|
||||
The Server class currently handles only one connection at a time;
|
||||
however it could be rewritten to allow various modes of operations,
|
||||
using multiple threads or processes or the select() system call as
|
||||
desired to serve multiple clients simultaneously (when using select(),
|
||||
still handling one request at a time). This would not require
|
||||
rewriting of the Client class. It may also be possible to adapt the
|
||||
code to use UDP instead of TCP, but then both classes will have to be
|
||||
rewritten (and unless extensive acknowlegements and request serial
|
||||
numbers are used, the server should handle duplicate requests, so its
|
||||
semantics should be idempotent -- shrudder).
|
||||
|
||||
Even though the FSProxy and RCSProxy modules define client classes,
|
||||
the client class is fully generic -- what methods it supports is
|
||||
determined entirely by the server. The server class, however, must be
|
||||
derived from. This is generally done as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
from server import Server
|
||||
from client import Client
|
||||
|
||||
# Define a class that performs the operations locally
|
||||
class MyClassLocal:
|
||||
def __init__(self): ...
|
||||
def _close(self): ...
|
||||
|
||||
# Derive a server class using multiple inheritance
|
||||
class MyClassServer(MyClassLocal, Server):
|
||||
def __init__(self, address):
|
||||
# Must initialize MyClassLocal as well as Server
|
||||
MyClassLocal.__init__(self)
|
||||
Server.__init__(self, address)
|
||||
def _close(self):
|
||||
Server._close()
|
||||
MyClassLocal._close()
|
||||
|
||||
# A dummy client class
|
||||
class MyClassClient(Client): pass
|
||||
|
||||
Note that because MyClassLocal isn't used in the definition of
|
||||
MyClassClient, it would actually be better to place it in a separate
|
||||
module so the definition of MyClassLocal isn't executed when we only
|
||||
instantiate a client.
|
||||
|
||||
The modules client and server should probably be renamed to Client and
|
||||
Server in order to match the class names.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue