From 53540ab0716de09c26ba7ce9b0f3f371556271ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fred Drake Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 01:07:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Correct the RE equivalent of scanf()'s %x and %X patterns. Closes SF bug #572169. --- Doc/lib/libre.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Doc/lib/libre.tex b/Doc/lib/libre.tex index 5ab8d84a297..3531e82bba2 100644 --- a/Doc/lib/libre.tex +++ b/Doc/lib/libre.tex @@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ offers some more-or-less equivalent mappings between \lineii{\code{\%u}} {\regexp{\e d+}} \lineii{\code{\%x}, \code{\%X}} - {\regexp{0[xX][\e dA-Fa-f]}} + {\regexp{0[xX][\e dA-Fa-f]+}} \end{tableii} To extract the filename and numbers from a string like