Add Raymond H to the list of authors; add some XXX comments about

possible API improvements.
This commit is contained in:
Guido van Rossum 2002-08-21 02:44:04 +00:00
parent 43db0d6a2c
commit 26588222b3
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ what's tested is actually `z in y'.
# #
# - Guido van Rossum rewrote much of the code, made some API changes, # - Guido van Rossum rewrote much of the code, made some API changes,
# and cleaned up the docstrings. # and cleaned up the docstrings.
#
# - Raymond Hettinger implemented a number of speedups and other
# improvements.
__all__ = ['BaseSet', 'Set', 'ImmutableSet'] __all__ = ['BaseSet', 'Set', 'ImmutableSet']
@ -67,6 +70,7 @@ class BaseSet(object):
"""This is an abstract class.""" """This is an abstract class."""
# Don't call this from a concrete subclass! # Don't call this from a concrete subclass!
if self.__class__ is BaseSet: if self.__class__ is BaseSet:
# XXX Maybe raise TypeError instead, like basestring()?
raise NotImplementedError, ("BaseSet is an abstract class. " raise NotImplementedError, ("BaseSet is an abstract class. "
"Use Set or ImmutableSet.") "Use Set or ImmutableSet.")
@ -285,6 +289,8 @@ class ImmutableSet(BaseSet):
def __init__(self, seq): def __init__(self, seq):
"""Construct an immutable set from a sequence.""" """Construct an immutable set from a sequence."""
# XXX Maybe this should default seq to None?
# XXX Creating an empty immutable set is not unheard of.
self._hashcode = None self._hashcode = None
self._data = data = {} self._data = data = {}
# I don't know a faster way to do this in pure Python. # I don't know a faster way to do this in pure Python.
@ -296,6 +302,9 @@ class ImmutableSet(BaseSet):
value = True value = True
# XXX Should this perhaps look for _as_immutable? # XXX Should this perhaps look for _as_immutable?
# XXX If so, should use self.update(seq). # XXX If so, should use self.update(seq).
# XXX (Well, ImmutableSet doesn't have update(); the base
# XXX class could have _update() which does this though, and
# XXX we could use that here and in Set.update().)
for key in seq: for key in seq:
data[key] = value data[key] = value